Show option P in the prompt and explain it properly on a dedicated line
in online help and documentation.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Options j and J roll over at the bottom and go to the first undecided
hunk and hunk 1, respectively. Let options k and K do the same when
they reach the top of the hunk array, so let them go to the last
undecided hunk and the last hunk, respectively, for consistency. Also
use the same direction-neutral error messages.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The options y, n, and e mark the current hunk as decided. If there's
another undecided hunk towards the bottom of the hunk array they go
there. If there isn't, but there is another undecided hunk towards the
top then they go to the very first hunk, no matter if it has already
been decided on.
The option j does basically the same move. Technically it is not
allowed if there's no undecided hunk towards the bottom, but the
variable "permitted" is never reset, so this permission is retained
from the very first hunk. That may a bug, but this behavior is at
least consistent with y, n, and e and arguably more useful than
refusing to move.
Improve the roll-over behavior of these four options by moving to the
first undecided hunk instead of hunk 1, consistent with what they do
when not rolling over.
Also adjust the error message for j, as it will only be shown if
there's no other undecided hunk in either direction.
Reported-by: Windl, Ulrich <u.windl@ukr.de>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The variable "permitted" is not reset after moving to a different hunk,
so it only accumulates permission and doesn't necessarily reflect those
of the current hunk. This may be a bug, but is actually useful with the
option J, which can be used at the last hunk to roll over to the first
hunk. Make this particular behavior official.
Also adjust the error message, as it will only be shown if there's just
a single hunk.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The options j, J, k, and K don't affect the status of the current hunk.
They just go to a different one. This is true whether the current hunk
is undecided or not. Avoid misunderstanding by no longer mentioning
the current hunk explicitly in their help texts.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git does not really "store the contents of the next commit"
anywhere; rather, you the user use the index to prepare it.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
[jc; made the change relative to what is already in 'next']
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Mention the --force option earlier
- Remove the explanation of shell globbing vs git's internal glob
system, since users are confused by it and there's a clearer
discussion in the EXAMPLES section.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Add a basic example of how "git add" is normally used
- It's not technically true that you *must* use the `add` command to
add changes before running `git commit`, because `git commit -a`
exists. Instead say that you *can* use the `add` command.
- Mention early on that "index" is another word for "staging area",
since Git very rarely uses the word "index" in its output
(`git status`) uses the term "staged", and many Git users are
unfamiliar with the term "index"
- Remove "It typically adds" (it's not clear what "typically" means),
and instead mention that `git add -p` can be used to add
partial contents
- Currently the introduction is somewhat repetitive ("to prepare the
content staged for the next commit" ... "this snapshot that is taken
as the contents of the next commit."), replace with a single sentence
("The "index" [...] is where Git stores the contents of the next
commit.")
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch compliments the previous commit, where builtins that use
add-patch infrastructure now respect diff.context and
diff.interHunkContext file configurations.
In particular, this patch helps users who don't want to set persistent
context configurations or just want a way to override them on a one-time
basis, by allowing the relevant builtins to accept corresponding command
line options that override the file configurations.
This mimics commands such as diff and log, which allow for both context
file configuration and command line overrides.
Signed-off-by: Leon Michalak <leonmichalak6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
