A new configuration variable commitGraph.changedPaths allows to
turn "--changed-paths" on by default for "git commit-graph".
* ey/commit-graph-changed-paths-config:
commit-graph: add new config for changed-paths & recommend it in scalar
Because gitignore patterns are passed to fnmatch, the handling of
backslashes is the same as it is there: it can be used to escape
metacharacters. We do reference fnmatch(3) for more details, but it may
be friendlier to point out this implication explicitly (especially for
people who want to know about backslash handling and search the
documentation for that word). There are also two cases that I've seen
some other backslash-escaping systems handle differently, so let's
describe those:
1. A backslash before any character treats that character literally,
even if it's not otherwise a meta-character. As opposed to
including the backslash itself (like "foo\bar" in shell expands to
"foo\bar") or forbidding it ("foo\zar" is required to produce a
diagnostic in C).
2. A backslash at the end of the string is an invalid pattern (and not
a literal backslash).
This second one in particular was a point of confusion between our
implementation and the one in JGit. Our wildmatch behavior matches what
POSIX specifies for fnmatch, so the code and documentation are in line.
But let's add a test to cover this case. Note that the behavior here
differs between wildmatch itself (which is what gitignore will use) and
pathspec matching (which will only turn to wildmatch if a literal match
fails). So we match "foo\" to "foo\" in pathspecs, but not via
gitignore.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update the usage string of `git bisect` and documentation to match each
other. While at it, also:
1. Move the synopsis of `git bisect` subcommands to the synopsis
section, so that the test `t0450-txt-doc-vs-help.sh` can pass.
2. Document the `git bisect next` subcommand, which exists in the code
but is missing from the documentation.
See also: [1].
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/3DA38465-7636-4EEF-B074-53E4628F5355@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Ben Knoble <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruoyu Zhong <zhongruoyu@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The placeholder markup is underscore (_), not backtick (`) as well.
The inline-verbatim markup (backticks) handle interior formatting. This
means in this case that it applies HTML `<code>` to the underscores and
`<em>` to the placeholder.
That is the effect, anyway; we can see from the rest of 042d6f34 (doc:
git-checkout: clarify `-b` and `-B`, 2025-09-10) that this was probably
an unintended mix-up.
Acked-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git fast-import" is taught to handle signed tags, just like it
recently learned to handle signed commits, in different ways.
* cc/fast-import-strip-signed-tags:
fast-import: add '--signed-tags=<mode>' option
fast-export: handle all kinds of tag signatures
t9350: properly count annotated tags
lib-gpg: allow tests with GPGSM or GPGSSH prereq first
doc: git-tag: stop focusing on GPG signed tags
"git sparse-checkout" subcommand learned a new "clean" action to
prune otherwise unused working-tree files that are outside the
areas of interest.
* ds/sparse-checkout-clean:
sparse-index: improve advice message instructions
t: expand tests around sparse merges and clean
sparse-index: point users to new 'clean' action
sparse-checkout: add --verbose option to 'clean'
dir: add generic "walk all files" helper
sparse-checkout: match some 'clean' behavior
sparse-checkout: add basics of 'clean' command
sparse-checkout: remove use of the_repository
Add a note after the `git send-email` section explaining how
contributors can confirm that their patches reached the mailing
list by checking https://lore.kernel.org/git/. This helps
contributors verify that their emails were successfully delivered.
Signed-off-by: Queen Ediri Jessa <qjessa662@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have two different repacking strategies in Git:
- The "gc" strategy uses git-gc(1).
- The "incremental" strategy uses multi-pack indices and `git
multi-pack-index repack` to merge together smaller packfiles as
determined by a specific batch size.
The former strategy is our old and trusted default, whereas the latter
has historically been used for our scheduled maintenance. But both
strategies have their shortcomings:
- The "gc" strategy performs regular all-into-one repacks. Furthermore
it is rather inflexible, as it is not easily possible for a user to
enable or disable specific subtasks.
- The "incremental" strategy is not a full replacement for the "gc"
strategy as it doesn't know to prune stale data.
So today, we don't have a strategy that is well-suited for large repos
while being a full replacement for the "gc" strategy.
Introduce a new "geometric" strategy that aims to fill this gap. This
strategy invokes all the usual cleanup tasks that git-gc(1) does like
pruning reflogs and rerere caches as well as stale worktrees. But where
it differs from both the "gc" and "incremental" strategy is that it uses
our geometric repacking infrastructure exposed by git-repack(1) to
repack packfiles. The advantage of geometric repacking is that we only
need to perform an all-into-one repack when the object count in a repo
has grown significantly.
One downside of this strategy is that pruning of unreferenced objects is
not going to happen regularly anymore. Every geometric repack knows to
soak up all loose objects regardless of their reachability, and merging
two or more packs doesn't consider reachability, either. Consequently,
the number of unreachable objects will grow over time.
This is remedied by doing an all-into-one repack instead of a geometric
repack whenever we determine that the geometric repack would end up
merging all packfiles anyway. This all-into-one repack then performs our
usual reachability checks and writes unreachable objects into a cruft
pack. As cruft packs won't ever be merged during geometric repacks we
can thus phase out these objects over time.
Of course, this still means that we retain unreachable objects for far
longer than with the "gc" strategy. But the maintenance strategy is
intended especially for large repositories, where the basic assumption
is that the set of unreachable objects will be significantly dwarfed by
the number of reachable objects.
If this assumption is ever proven to be too disadvantageous we could for
example introduce a time-based strategy: if the largest packfile has not
been touched for longer than $T, we perform an all-into-one repack. But
for now, such a mechanism is deferred into the future as it is not clear
yet whether it is needed in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While the user can pick the "incremental" maintenance strategy, it is
not possible to explicitly use the "gc" strategy. This has two
downsides:
- It is impossible to use the default "gc" strategy for a specific
repository when the strategy was globally set to a different strategy.
- It is not possible to use git-gc(1) for scheduled maintenance.
Address these issues by making making the "gc" strategy configurable.
Furthermore, extend the strategy so that git-gc(1) runs for both manual
and scheduled maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "maintenance.strategy" configuration allows users to configure how
Git is supposed to perform repository maintenance. The idea is that we
provide a set of high-level strategies that may be useful in different
contexts, like for example when handling a large monorepo. Furthermore,
the strategy can be tweaked by the user by overriding specific tasks.
In its current form though, the strategy only applies to scheduled
maintenance. This creates something of a gap, as scheduled and manual
maintenance will now use _different_ strategies as the latter would
continue to use git-gc(1) by default. This makes the strategies way less
useful than they could be on the one hand. But even more importantly,
the two different strategies might clash with one another, where one of
the strategies performs maintenance in such a way that it discards
benefits from the other strategy.
So ideally, it should be possible to pick one strategy that then applies
globally to all the different ways that we perform maintenance. This
doesn't necessarily mean that the strategy always does the _same_ thing
for every maintenance type. But it means that the strategy can configure
the different types to work in tandem with each other.
Change the meaning of "maintenance.strategy" accordingly so that the
strategy is applied to both types, manual and scheduled. As preceding
commits have introduced logic to run maintenance tasks depending on this
type we can tweak strategies so that they perform those tasks depending
on the context.
Note that this raises the question of backwards compatibility: when the
user has configured the "incremental" strategy we would have ignored
that strategy beforehand. Instead, repository maintenance would have
continued to use git-gc(1) by default.
But luckily, we can match that behaviour by:
- Keeping all current tasks of the incremental strategy as
`MAINTENANCE_TYPE_SCHEDULED`. This ensures that those tasks will not
run during manual maintenance.
- Configuring the "gc" task so that it is invoked during manual
maintenance.
Like this, the user shouldn't observe any difference in behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The geometric repacking task uses a factor of two for its geometric
sequence, meaning that each next pack must contain at least twice as
many objects as the next-smaller one. In some cases it may be helpful to
configure this factor though to reduce the number of packfile merges
even further, e.g. in very big repositories. But while git-repack(1)
itself supports doing this, the maintenance task does not give us a way
to tune it.
Introduce a new "maintenance.geometric-repack.splitFactor" configuration
to plug this gap.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a new "geometric-repack" task. This task uses our geometric
repack infrastructure as provided by git-repack(1) itself, which is a
strategy that especially hosting providers tend to use to amortize the
costs of repacking objects.
There is one issue though with geometric repacks, namely that they
unconditionally pack all loose objects, regardless of whether or not
they are reachable. This is done because it means that we can completely
skip the reachability step, which significantly speeds up the operation.
But it has the big downside that we are unable to expire objects over
time.
To address this issue we thus use a split strategy in this new task:
whenever a geometric repack would merge together all packs, we instead
do an all-into-one repack. By default, these all-into-one repacks have
cruft packs enabled, so unreachable objects would now be written into
their own pack. Consequently, they won't be soaked up during geometric
repacking anymore and can be expired with the next full repack, assuming
that their expiry date has surpassed.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation updates.
* je/doc-pull:
doc: git-pull: clarify how to exit a conflicted merge
doc: git-pull: delete the example
doc: git-pull: clarify options for integrating remote branch
doc: git-pull: move <repository> and <refspec> params
The beginning of SHA1-SHA256 interoperability work.
* bc/sha1-256-interop-01:
t1010: use BROKEN_OBJECTS prerequisite
t: allow specifying compatibility hash
fsck: consider gpgsig headers expected in tags
rev-parse: allow printing compatibility hash
docs: add documentation for loose objects
docs: improve ambiguous areas of pack format documentation
docs: reflect actual double signature for tags
docs: update offset order for pack index v3
docs: update pack index v3 format
The changed-path Bloom filters feature has proven stable and reliable
over several years of use, delivering significant performance
improvement for file history computation in large monorepos. Currently
a user can opt-in to writing the changed-path Bloom filters using the
"--changed-paths" option to "git commit-graph write". The filters will
be persisted until the user drops the filters using the
"--no-changed-paths" option. For this functionality, refer to 0087a87ba8
(commit-graph: persist existence of changed-paths, 2020-07-01).
Large monorepos using Git's background maintenance to build and update
commit-graph files could use an easy switch to enable this feature
without a foreground computation. In this commit, we're proposing a new
config option "commitGraph.changedPaths":
* If "true", "git commit-graph write" will write Bloom filters,
equivalent to passing "--changed-paths";
* If "false" or "unset", Bloom filters will be written during "git
commit-graph write" only if the filters already exist in the current
commit-graph file. This matches the default behaviour of "git
commit-graph write" without any "--[no-]changed-paths" option. Note
"false" can disable a previous "true" config value but doesn't imply
"--no-changed-paths".
This config will always respect the precedence of command line option
"--[no-]changed-paths".
We also set this new config as optional recommended config in scalar to
turn on this feature for large repos.
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Emily Yang <emilyyang.git@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All repository structure stats are outputted in a human-friendly table
form. This format is not suitable for machine parsing. Add a --format
option that supports three output modes: `table`, `keyvalue`, and `nul`.
The `table` mode is the default format and prints the same table output
as before.
With the `keyvalue` mode, each line of output contains a key-value pair
of a repository stat. The '=' character is used to delimit between keys
and values. The `nul` mode is similar to `keyvalue`, but key-values are
delimited by a NUL character instead of a newline. Also, instead of a
'=' character to delimit between keys and values, a newline character is
used. This allows stat values to support special characters without
having to cquote them. These two new modes provides output that is more
machine-friendly.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The amount of objects in a repository can provide insight regarding its
shape. To surface this information, use the path-walk API to count the
number of reachable objects in the repository by object type. All
regular references are used to determine the reachable set of objects.
The object counts are appended to the same table containing the
reference information.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The structure of a repository's history can have huge impacts on the
performance and health of the repository itself. Currently, Git lacks a
means to surface repository metrics regarding its structure/shape via a
single command. Acquiring this information requires users to be familiar
with the relevant data points and the various Git commands required to
surface them. To fill this gap, supplemental tools such as git-sizer(1)
have been developed.
To allow users to more readily identify repository structure related
information, introduce the "structure" subcommand in git-repo(1). The
goal of this subcommand is to eventually provide similar functionality
to git-sizer(1), but natively in Git.
The initial version of this command only iterates through all references
in the repository and tracks the count of branches, tags, remote refs,
and other reference types. The corresponding information is displayed in
a human-friendly table formatted in a very similar manner to
git-sizer(1). The width of each table column is adjusted automatically
to satisfy the requirements of the widest row contained.
Subsequent commits will surface additional relevant data points to
output and also provide other more machine-friendly output formats.
Based-on-patch-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Show option P in the prompt and explain it properly on a dedicated line
in online help and documentation.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A few more things that patch authors can do to help maintainer to
keep track of their topics better.
* tb/doc-submitting-patches:
SubmittingPatches: guidance for multi-series efforts
SubmittingPatches: extend release-notes experiment to topic names
The code in "git add -p" and friends to iterate over hunks was
riddled with bugs, which has been corrected.
* rs/add-patch-options-fix:
add-patch: reset "permitted" at loop start
add-patch: let options a and d roll over like y and n
add-patch: let options k and K roll over like j and J
add-patch: let options y, n, j, and e roll over to next undecided
add-patch: document that option J rolls over
add-patch: improve help for options j, J, k, and K
Commit 5040f9f164 ("doc: add technical design doc for large object
promisors", 2025-02-18) added the large object promisors document
as a technical document (with a '.txt' extension). The merge commit
2c6fd30198 ("Merge branch 'cc/lop-remote'", 2025-03-05) seems to
have renamed the file with an '.adoc' extension.
Despite the '.adoc' extension, this document was not being formatted
by asciidoc(tor) as part of the docs build. In order to do so, add
the document to the make and meson build files.
Having added the document to the build, asciidoc and asciidoctor find
(slightly different) problems with the syntax of the input document.
The first set of warnings (only issued by asciidoc) relate to some
'section title out of sequence: expected level 3, got level 4'. This
document uses 'setext' style of section headers, using a series of
underline characters, where the character used denotes the level of
the title. From document title to level 5 (see [1]), these characters
are =, -, ~, ^, +. This does not seem to fit the error message, which
implies that those characters denote levels 0 -> 4. Replacing the headings
underlined with '+' by the '^' character eliminates these warnings.
The second set of warnings (only issued by asciidoctor) relate to some
headings which seem to use both arabic and roman numerals as part of
a single 'list' sequence. This elicited either 'unterminated listing
block' or (for example) 'list item index: expected I, got II' warnings.
In order not to mix arabic and roman numerals, remove the numeral from
the '0) Non goals' heading. Similarly, the remaining roman numeral
entries had the ')' removed and turned into regular headings with I, II,
III ... at the beginning.
[1] https://asciidoctor.org/docs/asciidoc-recommended-practices/
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The formatting markup syntax used in this document (markdown?) is not
interpreted correctly by asciidoc or asciidoctor. The main problem is
the use of a '## ' prefix markup for some sub-headings, along with the
use of '```' code markup and some missing literal blocks.
In order to improve the (html) document formatting:
- replace the '## ' prefix sub-title syntax with the '~~' underlining
syntax for the relevant sub-headings.
- replace the '```' code markup, which causes asciidoc(tor) to simply
remove the marked up text, with a literal block '----' markup.
- the second ascii diagram, in the 'Merging commit-graph files'
section, is not rendered correctly by asciidoctor (asciidoc is fine)
so enclose it in a '....' block.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Both asciidoc and asciidoctor issue warnings about 'list item index:
expected n got n-1' for n=1->7 on lines 928, 931, 951, 974, 980, 1033
and 1049. In asciidoc, numbered lists must start at one, whereas this
file has a list starting at zero. Also, asciidoc and asciidoctor warn
about 'section title out of sequence: expected level 1, got level 2'
on line 17. (asciidoc only complains about the first instance of this,
while asciidoctor complains about them all, on lines 95, 258, 303, 316,
545, 612, 752, 824, 895, 923 and 1053). These warnings stem from the
section titles not being correctly nested within a document/chapter
title.
In order to address the first set of warnings, simply renumber the list
from one to seven, rather than zero to six. Fortunately, this does not
require altering additional text, since the enumeration of 'Known Bugs'
is not referred to anywhere else in the document.
In order to address the second set of warnings, change the section title
syntax from '=== title ===' to '== title ==', effectively reducing the
nesting level of the title by one. Also, some apparent (sub-)titles are
not marked up with sub-title syntax, so add some '=== ' prefix(s) to the
relevant headings.
In addition to the warnings, address some other formatting issues:
- the use of heavily nested unordered lists is not reflected in the
output (making the file totally unreadable) because each level of
nesting requires a different syntax. (i.e. replace '*' with '**'
for the second level, '*' with '***' for the third level, etc.)
- make use of literal blocks and manual indentation to get asciidoc
and asciidoctor to display even remotely similar output.
- make use of labelled lists, in some places, to get a similar looking
output to the input, for both asciidoc and asciidoctor.
- replace the trailing space in: `git grep ${SEARCH_TERM} OLDREV `
otherwise the entire line in which that appears is removed from
the output.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Both asciidoc and ascidoctor issue warnings about 'list item index:
expected n got n-1' for n=1->9 on lines 13, 15, 17, 20, 23, 25, 29,
31 and 33. In asciidoc, numbered lists must start at one, whereas this
file has a list starting at zero. Also, asciidoc and asciidoctor warn
about 'section title out of sequence: expected level 1, got level 2'
on line 38. (asciidoc only complains about the first instance of this,
while asciidoctor complains about them all, on lines 94, 141, 142,
184, 185, 257, 288, 289, 290, 397, 424, 485, 486 and 487). These
warnings stem from the section titles not being correctly nested within
a document/chapter title.
In order to address the first set of warnings, simply renumber the list
from one to nine, rather than zero to eight. This also requires altering
the text which refers to the section numbers, including other section
titles.
In order to address the second set of warnings, change the section title
syntax from '=== title ===' to '== title ==', effectively reducing the
nesting level of the title by one. Also, some of the titles are given
over multiple lines (they are very long), with an title '===' prefix
on each line. This leads to them being treated as separate sections
with no body text (as you can see from the line numbers given for the
asciidoctor warnings, above). So, for these titles, turn them into a
single (long) line of text.
In addition to the warnings, address some other formatting issues:
- the ascii branch diagrams didn't format correctly on asciidoctor
so include them in a literal block.
- several blocks of text were intended to be formatted 'as is' but
were not included in a literal block.
- in section 8, format the (A)->(D) in the text description as a
literal with `` marks, since (C) is rendered as a copyright
symbol in html otherwise.
- in section 9, a sub-list of two items is not formatted as such.
change the '*' introducer to '**' to correct the sub-list format.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Carry over the fixups from 8c3d7c5f (RelNotes: minor fixups before
2.51.1, 2025-10-15).
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
From user feedback:
- One user is confused about why `git reset --merge`
(why not just `git reset`?). Handle this by mentioning
`git merge --abort` and `git reset --abort` instead, which have a
more obvious meaning.
- 2 users want to know what "In older versions of Git" means exactly
(in versions older than 1.7.0). Handle this by removing the warning
since it was added 15 years ago (in 3f8fc184c0)
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
From user feedback: this example is confusing because it implies that
`git pull` will run `git merge` by default, but the default is
`--ff-only`.
We could instead show an example of a fast-forward merge, but that may
not add a lot since fast-forward merges are relatively simple. This lets
us keep the description short.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
From user feedback:
- One user is confused about the current default ("I was convinced that
the git default was still to merge on pull")
- One user is confused about why "git fetch" isn't mentioned earlier
- One user says they always forget what the arguments to `git pull` are
and that it's not immediately obvious that `--no-rebase` means "merge"
- One user wants `--ff-only` to be mentioned
Resolve this by listing the options for integrating the the remote
branch. This should help users figure out at a glance which one they
want to do, and make it clearer that --ff-only is the default.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
From user feedback:
- it's confusing that we use both <branch> and <refspec> to refer to the
second argument
- one user is not clear about what `refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*`
is meant to be an example of ("is it like a path?")
The DESCRIPTION section is also doing a lot right now: it's trying to
describe both how the <repository> and <refspec> arguments work (which
is pretty complex, as seen in the DEFAULT BEHAVIOUR section)
as well as how `git pull` calls `git fetch` and merge/rebase/etc
depending on the arguments.
Handle this by moving the description of the <repository> and <refspec>
arguments to the OPTIONS section, so that we can focus on the
merge/rebase/etc behaviour in the DESCRIPTION section, and refer folks
to the later sections for details.
Use the term "upstream" instead of 'the "remote" and "merge"
configuration for the current branch' since users are more likely to
know what an "upstream" is.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation mark-up fix.
* ja/doc-markup-attached-paragraph-fix:
doc: fix indentation of refStorage item in git-config(1)
doc: change the markup of paragraphs following a nested list item
Clarify the "--merge-base" command line option in "git merge-tree".
* en/doc-merge-tree-describe-merge-base:
Documentation/git-merge-tree.adoc: clarify the --merge-base option
