"git format-patch --cover-letter" learns to use a simpler format
instead of the traditional shortlog format to list its commits with
a new --cover-letter-format option and format.commitListFormat
configuration variable.
* mf/format-patch-cover-letter-format:
docs: add usage for the cover-letter fmt feature
format-patch: add commitListFormat config
format-patch: add ability to use alt cover format
format-patch: move cover letter summary generation
pretty.c: add %(count) and %(total) placeholders
The configuration variable format.noprefix did not behave as a
proper boolean variable, which has now been fixed and documented.
* kh/format-patch-noprefix-is-boolean:
doc: diff-options.adoc: make *.noprefix split translatable
doc: diff-options.adoc: show format.noprefix for format-patch
format-patch: make format.noprefix a boolean
Using "--cover-letter" we can tell format-patch to generate a cover
letter, in this cover letter there's a list of commits included in the
patch series and the format is specified by the "--cover-letter-format"
option. Would be useful if this format could be configured from the
config file instead of always needing to pass it from the command line.
Teach format-patch how to read the format spec for the cover letter from
the config files. The variable it should look for is called
format.commitListFormat.
Possible values:
- commitListFormat is set but no string is passed: it will default to
"[%(count)/%(total)] %s"
- if a string is passed: will use it as a format spec. Note that this
is either "shortlog" or a format spec prefixed by "log:"
e.g."log:%s (%an)"
- if commitListFormat is not set: it will default to the shortlog
format.
Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Often when sending patch series there's a need to clarify to the
reviewer what's the purpose of said series, since it might be difficult
to understand it from reading the commits messages one by one.
"git format-patch" provides the useful "--cover-letter" flag to declare
if we want it to generate a template for us to use. By default it will
generate a "git shortlog" of the changes, which developers find less
useful than they'd like, mainly because the shortlog groups commits by
author, and gives no obvious chronological order.
Give the ability to format-patch to specify an alternative format spec
through the "--cover-letter-format" option. This option either takes
"shortlog", which is the current format, or a format spec prefixed with
"log:".
Example:
git format-patch --cover-letter \
--cover-letter-format="log:[%(count)/%(total)] %s (%an)" HEAD~3
[1/3] this is a commit summary (Mirko Faina)
[2/3] this is another commit summary (Mirko Faina)
...
Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The config `format.noprefix` was added in 8d5213de (format-patch: add
format.noprefix option, 2023-03-09) to support no-prefix on paths.
That was immediately after making git-format-patch(1) not respect
`diff.noprefix`.[1]
The intent was to mirror `diff.noprefix`. But this config was
unintentionally[2] implemented by enabling no-prefix if any kind of
value is set.
† 1: c169af8f (format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefix, 2023-03-09)
† 2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260211073553.GA1867915@coredump.intra.peff.net/
Let’s indeed mirror `diff.noprefix` by treating it as a boolean.
This is a breaking change. And as far as breaking changes go it is
pretty benign:
• The documentation claims that this config is equivalent to
`diff.noprefix`; this is just a bug fix if the documentation is
what defines the application interface
• Only users with non-boolean values will run into problems when we
try to parse it as a boolean. But what would (1) make them suspect
they could do that in the first place, and (2) have motivated them to
do it?
• Users who have set this to `false` and expect that to mean *enable
format.noprefix* (current behavior) will now have the opposite
experience. Which is not a reasonable setup.
Let’s only offer a breaking change fig leaf by advising about the
previous behavior before dying.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git format-patch" takes "--from=<user ident>" command line option
and uses the given ident for patch e-mails, but this is not applied
to the cover letter, the option is ignored and the committer ident
of the current user is used. This has been the case ever since
"--from" was introduced in a9080475 (teach format-patch to place
other authors into in-body "From", 2013-07-03).
Teach the make_cover_letter() function to honor the option, instead of
always using the current committer identity. Change variable name from
"committer" to "from" to better reflect the purpose of the variable.
Signed-off-by: Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git --version reports its version with the prefix "git version ".
Remove precisely this string instead of everything up to and including
the rightmost space to avoid butchering version strings that contain
spaces. This helps Apple's release of Git, which reports its version
like this: "git version 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)".
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the early days of Git, Perl was used quite prominently throughout the
project. This has changed significantly as almost all of the executables
we ship nowadays have eventually been rewritten in C. Only a handful of
subsystems remain that require Perl:
- gitweb, a read-only web interface.
- A couple of scripts that allow importing repositories from GNU Arch,
CVS and Subversion.
- git-send-email(1), which can be used to send mails.
- git-request-pull(1), which is used to request somebody to pull from
a URL by sending an email.
- git-filter-branch(1), which uses Perl with the `--state-branch`
option. This command is typically recommended against nowadays in
favor of git-filter-repo(1).
- Our Perl bindings for Git.
- The netrc Git credential helper.
None of these subsystems can really be considered to be part of the
"core" of Git, and an installation without them is fully functional.
It is more likely than not that an end user wouldn't even notice that
any features are missing if those tools weren't installed. But while
Perl nowadays very much is an optional dependency of Git, there is a
significant limitation when Perl isn't available: developers cannot run
our test suite.
Preceding commits have started to lift this restriction by removing the
strict dependency on Perl in many central parts of the test library. But
there are still many tests that rely on small Perl helpers to do various
different things.
Introduce a new PERL_TEST_HELPERS prerequisite that guards all tests
that require Perl. This prerequisite is explicitly different than the
preexisting PERL prerequisite:
- PERL records whether or not features depending on the Perl
interpreter are built.
- PERL_TEST_HELPERS records whether or not a Perl interpreter is
available for our tests.
By having these two separate prerequisites we can thus distinguish
between tests that inherently depend on Perl because the underlying
feature does, and those tests that depend on Perl because the test
itself is using Perl.
Adapt all tests to set the PERL_TEST_HELPERS prerequisite as needed.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that the default value for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK is `true` there
is no longer a need to have that variable declared in all of our tests.
Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are various memory leaks hit by git-format-patch(1). Basically all
of them are trivial, except that un-setting `diffopt.no_free` requires
us to unset the `diffopt.file` because we manually close it already.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git format-patch --interdiff" for multi-patch series learned to
turn on cover letters automatically (unless told never to enable
cover letter with "--no-cover-letter" and such).
* rj/format-patch-auto-cover-with-interdiff:
format-patch: assume --cover-letter for diff in multi-patch series
t4014: cleanups in a few tests
When we deal with a multi-patch series in git-format-patch(1), if we see
`--interdiff` or `--range-diff` but no `--cover-letter`, we return with
an error, saying:
fatal: --range-diff requires --cover-letter or single patch
or:
fatal: --interdiff requires --cover-letter or single patch
This makes sense because the cover-letter is where we place the diff
from the previous version.
However, considering that `format-patch` generates a multi-patch as
needed, let's adopt a similar "cover as necessary" approach when using
`--interdiff` or `--range-diff`.
Therefore, relax the requirement for an explicit `--cover-letter` in a
multi-patch series when the user says `--iterdiff` or `--range-diff`.
Still, if only to return the error, respect "format.coverLetter=no" and
`--no-cover-letter`.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Arrange things we are going to create to be removed at end, and then
start creating them. That way, we will clean them up even if we fail
after creating some but before the end of the command.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running "format-patch" on a multiple patch series, the output
coming from "--interdiff" and "--range-diff" options is inserted
after the "shortlog" list of commits and the overall diffstat.
The idea is that shortlog/diffstat are shorter and with denser
information content, which gives a better overview before the
readers dive into more details of range/inter diff.
When working on a single patch, however, we stuff the inter/range
diff output before the actual patch, next to the diffstat. This
pushes down the patch text way down with inter/range diff output,
distracting readers.
Move the inter/range diff output to the very end of the output,
after all the patch text is shown.
As the inter/range diff is no longer part of the commentary block
(i.e., what comes after the log message and "---", but before the
patch text), stop producing "---" in the function that generates
them. But to separate it out visually (note: this is not needed
to help tools like "git apply" that pay attention to the hunk
headers to figure out the length of the hunks), add an extra blank
line between the end of the patch text and the inter/range diff.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--rfc" option of "git format-patch" learned to take an
optional string value to be used in place of "RFC" to tweak the
"[PATCH]" on the subject header.
* jc/format-patch-rfc-more:
format-patch: "--rfc=-(WIP)" appends to produce [PATCH (WIP)]
format-patch: allow --rfc to optionally take a value, like --rfc=WIP
The "-k" and "--rfc" options of "format-patch" will now error out
when used together, as one tells us not to add anything to the
title of the commit, and the other one tells us to add "RFC" in
addition to "PATCH".
* ds/format-patch-rfc-and-k:
format-patch: ensure that --rfc and -k are mutually exclusive
In the previous step, the "--rfc" option of "format-patch" learned
to take an optional string value to prepend to the subject prefix,
so that --rfc=WIP can give "[WIP PATCH]".
There may be cases in which the extra string wants to come after the
subject prefix. Extend the mechanism to allow "--rfc=-(WIP)" [*] to
signal that the extra string is to be appended instead of getting
prepended, resulting in "[PATCH (WIP)]".
In the documentation, discourage (ab)using "--rfc=-RFC" to say
"[PATCH RFC]" just to be different, when "[RFC PATCH]" is the norm.
[Footnote]
* The syntax takes inspiration from Perl's open syntax that opens
pipes "open fh, '|-', 'cmd'", where the dash signals "the other
stuff comes here".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the "--rfc" option, we can tweak the "[PATCH]" (or whatever
string specified with the "--subject-prefix" option, instead of
"PATCH") that we prefix the title of the commit with into "[RFC
PATCH]", but some projects may want "[rfc PATCH]". Adding a new
option, e.g., "--rfc-lowercase", to support such need every time
somebody wants to use different strings would lead to insanity of
accumulating unbounded number of such options.
Allow an optional value specified for the option, so that users can
use "--rfc=rfc" (think of "--rfc" without value as a short-hand for
"--rfc=RFC") if they wanted to.
This can of course be (ab)used to make the prefix "[WIP PATCH]" by
passing "--rfc=WIP". Passing an empty string, i.e., "--rfc=", is
the same as "--no-rfc" to override an option given earlier on the
same command line.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a bug that allows the "--rfc" and "-k" options to be specified together
when "git format-patch" is executed, which was introduced in the commit
e0d7db7423 ("format-patch: --rfc honors what --subject-prefix sets").
Add a couple of additional tests to t4014, to cover additional cases of
the mutual exclusivity between different "git format-patch" options.
Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing the cover letter, the encode_email_headers option was
ignored. That is, UTF-8 subject lines and email addresses were
written out as-is, without any Q-encoding, even if
--encode-email-headers was passed on the command line.
This is due to encode_email_headers not being copied over from
struct rev_info to struct pretty_print_context. Fix that and add
a test.
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Another step to deprecate test_i18ngrep.
* jc/test-i18ngrep:
tests: teach callers of test_i18ngrep to use test_grep
test framework: further deprecate test_i18ngrep
They are equivalents and the former still exists, so as long as the
only change this commit makes are to rewrite test_i18ngrep to
test_grep, there won't be any new bug, even if there still are
callers of test_i18ngrep remaining in the tree, or when merged to
other topics that add new uses of test_i18ngrep.
This patch was produced more or less with
git grep -l -e 'test_i18ngrep ' 't/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-*.sh' |
xargs perl -p -i -e 's/test_i18ngrep /test_grep /'
and a good way to sanity check the result yourself is to run the
above in a checkout of c4603c1c (test framework: further deprecate
test_i18ngrep, 2023-10-31) and compare the resulting working tree
contents with the result of applying this patch to the same commit.
You'll see that test_i18ngrep in a few t/lib-*.sh files corrected,
in addition to the manual reproduction.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git format-patch --rfc --subject-prefix=<foo>" used to ignore the
"--subject-prefix" option and used "[RFC PATCH]"; now we will add
"RFC" prefix to whatever subject prefix is specified.
This is a backward compatible change that may deserve a note.
* dd/format-patch-rfc-updates:
format-patch: --rfc honors what --subject-prefix sets
Rather than replacing the configured subject prefix (either through the
git config or command line) entirely with "RFC PATCH", this change
prepends RFC to whatever subject prefix was already in use.
This is useful, for example, when a user is working on a repository that
has a subject prefix considered to disambiguate patches:
git config format.subjectPrefix 'PATCH my-project'
Prior to this change, formatting patches with --rfc would lose the
'my-project' information.
The data flow for the subject-prefix was that rev.subject_prefix
were to be kept the authoritative version of the subject prefix even
while parsing command line options, and sprefix variable was used as
a temporary area to futz with it. Now, the parsing code has been
refactored to build the subject prefix into the sprefix variable and
assigns its value at the end to rev.subject_prefix, which makes the
flow easier to grasp.
Signed-off-by: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch makes it possible to directly feed a branch description to
derive the cover letter from. The use case is formatting dynamically
created temporary commits which are not referenced anywhere.
The most obvious alternative would be creating a temporary branch and
setting a description on it, but that doesn't seem particularly elegant.
Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Consistently spell "Message-ID" as such, not "Message-Id".
* jc/spell-id-in-both-caps-in-message-id:
e-mail workflow: Message-ID is spelled with ID in both capital letters
We used to write "Message-Id:" and "Message-ID:" pretty much
interchangeably, and the header name is defined to be case
insensitive by the RFCs, but the canonical form "Message-ID:" is
used throughout the RFC documents, so let's imitate it ourselves.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
"git format-patch" honors the src/dst prefixes set to nonstandard
values with configuration variables like "diff.noprefix", causing
receiving end of the patch that expects the standard -p1 format to
break. Teach "format-patch" to ignore end-user configuration and
always use the standard prefixes.
This is a backward compatibility breaking change.
* jk/format-patch-ignore-noprefix:
rebase: prefer --default-prefix to --{src,dst}-prefix for format-patch
format-patch: add format.noprefix option
format-patch: do not respect diff.noprefix
diff: add --default-prefix option
t4013: add tests for diff prefix options
diff: factor out src/dst prefix setup
The previous commit dropped support for diff.noprefix in format-patch.
While this will do the right thing in most cases (where sending patches
without a prefix was an accidental side effect of the sender preferring
to see their local patches without prefixes), it left no good option for
a project or workflow where you really do want to send patches without
prefixes. You'd be stuck using "--no-prefix" for every invocation.
So let's add a config option specific to format-patch that enables this
behavior. That gives people who have such a workflow a way to get what
they want, but makes it hard to accidentally trigger it.
A more backwards-compatible way of doing the transition would be to have
format.noprefix default to diff.noprefix when it's not set. But that
doesn't really help the "accidental" problem; people would have to
manually set format.noprefix=false. And it's unlikely that anybody
really wants format.noprefix=true in the first place. I'm adding it here
mostly as an escape hatch, not because anybody has expressed any
interest in it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The output of format-patch respects diff.noprefix, but this usually ends
up being a hassle for people receiving the patch, as they have to
manually specify "-p0" in order to apply it.
I don't think there was any specific intention for it to behave this
way. The noprefix option is handled by git_diff_ui_config(), and
format-patch exists in a gray area between plumbing and porcelain.
People do look at the output, and we'd expect it to colorize things,
respect their choice of algorithm, and so on. But this particular option
creates problems for the receiver (in theory so does diff.mnemonicprefix,
but since we are always formatting commits, the mnemonic prefixes will
always be "a/" and "b/").
So let's disable it. The slight downsides are:
- people who have set diff.noprefix presumably like to see their
patches without prefixes. If they use format-patch to review their
series, they'll see prefixes. On the other hand, it is probably a
good idea for them to look at what will actually get sent out.
We could try to play games here with "is stdout a tty", as we do for
color. But that's not a completely reliable signal, and it's
probably not worth the trouble. If you want to see the patch with
the usual bells and whistles, then you are better off using "git
log" or "git show".
- if a project really does have a workflow that likes prefix-less
patches, and the receiver is prepared to use "-p0", then the sender
now has to manually say "--no-prefix" for each format-patch
invocation. That doesn't seem _too_ terrible given that the receiver
has to manually say "-p0" for each git-am invocation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When formatting an empty commit, it is surprising that a totally empty
file is generated. Set the flag to always print the header, matching
the behaviour of git-log.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a lower precedence configuration file (e.g. /etc/gitconfig)
defines format.attach in any way, there was no way to disable it in
a more specific configuration file (e.g. $HOME/.gitconfig).
Change the behaviour of setting it to an empty string. It used to
mean that the result is still a multipart message with only dashes
used as a multi-part separator, but now it resets the setting to
the default (which would be to give an inline patch, unless other
command line options are in effect).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
mboxrd is a more robust output format when used with --stdout
and needs more exposure. Introducing this config knob lets
users choose the more robust format for all their --stdout
uses.
Relying on --pretty=mboxrd and including all of pretty-formats.txt
in the `git format-patch' documentation would likely be
confusing to users. Furthermore, this setting is useful across
multiple invocations. So introduce `format.mboxrd' as a boolean
configuration knob that changes the default --pretty=email format
to --pretty=mboxrd when (and only when) --stdout is in use.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Despite POSIX states that:
> The old egrep and fgrep commands are likely to be supported for many
> years to come as implementation extensions, allowing historical
> applications to operate unmodified.
GNU grep 3.8 started to warn[1]:
> The egrep and fgrep commands, which have been deprecated since
> release 2.5.3 (2007), now warn that they are obsolescent and should
> be replaced by grep -E and grep -F.
Prepare for their removal in the future.
[1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2022-09/msg00001.html
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As the need to use the "--force-in-body-from" option primarily is
tied to which mailing list the mails go to (and get their From:
address mangled), it is likely that a user who needs to use this
option once to interact with their upstream project needs to use it
for all patches they send out.
Add a configuration variable, suitable for setting in the local
configuration file per repository, for this.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Users may be authoring and committing their commits under the same
e-mail address they use to send their patches from, in which case
they shouldn't need to use the in-body From: line in their outgoing
e-mails. At the receiving end, "git am" will use the address on the
"From:" header of the incoming e-mail and all should be well.
Some mailing lists, however, mangle the From: address from what the
original sender had; in such a situation, the user may want to add
the in-body "From:" header even for their own patches.
"git format-patch --[no-]force-in-body-from" was invented for such
users.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
e900d494dc (diff: add an API for deferred freeing, 2021-02-11) added a
way to allow reusing diffopts: the no_free bit. 244c27242f (diff.[ch]:
have diff_free() call clear_pathspec(opts.pathspec), 2022-02-16) made
that mechanism mandatory.
git format-patch only sets no_free when --output is given, causing it to
forget pathspecs after the first commit. Set no_free unconditionally
instead.
The existing test was unable to detect this breakage because it checks
stderr for the absence of a certain string, but format-patch writes to
stdout. Also the test was not checking the case of one commit modifying
multiple files and a pathspec limiting the diff. Replace it with a more
thorough one.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Take advantage of test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output
rather than using for-loops or a series of `echo` commands. Not only is
test_write_lines() a natural fit for such a task, but there is less
opportunity for a broken &&-chain.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `-v<n>` option of `format-patch` can give nothing but an
integral iteration number to patches in a series. Some people,
however, prefer to mark a new iteration with only a small fixup
with a non integral iteration number (e.g. an "oops, that was
wrong" fix-up patch for v4 iteration may be labeled as "v4.1").
Allow `format-patch` to take such a non-integral iteration
number.
`<n>` can be any string, such as '3.1' or '4rev2'. In the case
where it is a non-integral value, the "Range-diff" and "Interdiff"
headers will not include the previous version.
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As a follow-up to d162b25f95 (tests: remove support for
GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove most uses of test_i18ncmp
via a simple s/test_i18ncmp/test_cmp/g search-replacement.
I'm leaving t6300-for-each-ref.sh out due to a conflict with in-flight
changes between "master" and "seen", as well as the prerequisite
itself due to other changes between "master" and "next/seen" which add
new test_i18ncmp uses.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Prepare tests not to be affected by the name of the default branch
"git init" creates.
* js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch: (28 commits)
tests: drop prereq `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` where no longer needed
t99*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
tests(git-p4): transition to the default branch name `main`
t9[5-7]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t9[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t8*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t7[5-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t7[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t6[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t64*: preemptively adjust alignment to prepare for `master` -> `main`
t6[0-3]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t5[6-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t55[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t55[23]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t551*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t550*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t5503: prepare aligned comment for replacing `master` with `main`
t5[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
t5323: prepare centered comment for `master` -> `main`
t4*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"
...
The maximum length of output filenames "git format-patch" creates
has become configurable (used to be capped at 64).
* jc/format-patch-name-max:
format-patch: make output filename configurable
Carefully excluding t4013 and t4015, which see independent development
elsewhere at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch
name in t4*. This trick was performed via
$ (cd t &&
sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
-e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t4*.sh t4211/*.export &&
git checkout HEAD -- t4013\*)
This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main`
for those tests.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.
To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in
- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,
- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
initialize the default branch,
- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,
- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
uses `master`)
This trick was performed by this command:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh
After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:
$ git checkout HEAD -- \
t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh
We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For the past 15 years, we've used the hardcoded 64 as the length
limit of the filename of the output from the "git format-patch"
command. Since the value is shorter than the 80-column terminal, it
could grow without line wrapping a bit. At the same time, since the
value is longer than half of the 80-column terminal, we could fit
two or more of them in "ls" output on such a terminal if we allowed
to lower it.
Introduce a new command line option --filename-max-length=<n> and a
new configuration variable format.filenameMaxLength to override the
hardcoded default.
While we are at it, remove a check that the name of output directory
does not exceed PATH_MAX---this check is pointless in that by the
time control reaches the function, the caller would already have
done an equivalent of "mkdir -p", so if the system does not like an
overly long directory name, the control wouldn't have reached here,
and otherwise, we know that the system allowed the output directory
to exist. In the worst case, we will get an error when we try to
open the output file and handle the error correctly anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We've never intended to support diff's --output option in format-patch.
And until baa4adc66a (parse-options: disable option abbreviation with
PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN, 2019-01-27), it was impossible to trigger. We
first parse the format-patch options before handing the remainder off to
setup_revisions(). Before that commit, we'd accept "--output=foo" as an
abbreviation for "--output-directory=foo". But afterwards, we don't
check abbreviations, and --output gets passed to the diff code.
This results in nonsense behavior and bugs. The diff code will have
opened a filehandle at rev.diffopt.file, but we'll overwrite that with
our own handles that we open for each individual patch file. So the
--output file will always just be empty. But worse, the diff code also
sets rev.diffopt.close_file, so log_tree_commit() will close the
filehandle itself. And then the main loop in cmd_format_patch() will try
to close it again, resulting in a double-free.
The simplest solution would be to just disallow --output with
format-patch, as nobody ever intended it to work. However, we have
accidentally documented it (because format-patch includes diff-options).
And it does work with "git log", which writes the whole output to the
specified file. It's easy enough to make that work for format-patch,
too: it's really the same as --stdout, but pointed at a specific file.
We can detect the use of the --output option by the "close_file" flag
(note that we can't use rev.diffopt.file, since the diff setup will
otherwise set it to stdout). So we just need to unset that flag, but
don't have to do anything else. Our situation is otherwise exactly like
--stdout (note that we don't fclose() the file, but nor does the stdout
case; exiting the program takes care of that for us).
Reported-by: Johannes Postler <johannes.postler@txture.io>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --stdout and --output-directory options are mutually exclusive, but
it's hard to tell from reading the code. We have three separate
conditionals that check for use_stdout, and it's only after we've set up
the output_directory fully that we check whether the user also specified
--stdout.
Instead, let's check the exclusion explicitly first, then have a single
conditional that handles stdout versus an output directory. This is
slightly easier to follow now, and also will keep things sane when we
add another output mode in a future patch.
We'll add a few tests as well, covering the mutual exclusion and the
fact that we are not confused by a configured output directory.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
