Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of read_populate_todo(), sequencer_continue() can
already return errors, so its caller must be already prepared to
handle error returns, and with this step, we make it notice an
error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make read_populate_todo() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
There are two call sites of read_and_refresh_cache(), one of which is
pick_commits(), whose callers were already prepared to do the right
thing given an "error" return from it by an earlier patch, so the
conversion is safe.
The other one, sequencer_pick_revisions() was also prepared to relay
an error return back to its caller in all remaining cases in an
earlier patch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of prepare_revs(), walk_revs_populate_todo() was just
taught to return errors, after verifying that its callers are prepared
to handle error returns, and with this step, we make it notice an
error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make prepare_revs() callable from new
callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The function sequencer_pick_revisions() is the only caller of
walk_revs_populate_todo(), and it already returns errors
appropriately, so its caller must be already prepared to handle error
returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make walk_revs_populate_todo()
callable from new callers that want it not to die, without changing
the external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only two callers of do_pick_commit(), pick_commits() and
single_pick() already check the return value and pass it on to their
callers, so their callers must be already prepared to handle error
returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make do_pick_commit() callable from
new callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
While at it, remove the superfluous space.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of do_recursive_merge(), do_pick_commit() already
checks the return value and passes it on to its callers, so its caller
must be already prepared to handle error returns, and with this step,
we make it notice an error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make do_recursive_merge() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of write_message(), do_pick_commit() already checks
the return value and passes it on to its callers, so its caller must
be already prepared to handle error returns, and with this step, we
make it notice an error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make write_message() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The eventual caller of do_pick_commit() is sequencer_pick_revisions(),
which already relays a reported error from its helper functions
(including this one), and both of its two callers know how to react to
a negative return correctly.
So this makes do_pick_commit() callable from new callers that want it
not to die, without changing the external behaviour of anything
existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The function sequencer_pick_revisions() has only two callers,
cmd_revert() and cmd_cherry_pick(), both of which check the return
value and react appropriately upon errors.
So this is a safe conversion to make sequencer_pick_revisions()
callable from new callers that want it not to die, without changing
the external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Add preliminary support for detection of the build plaform, and reporting
of same with the `git version --build-options' command. This can be useful
for bug reporting, to distinguish between 32 and 64-bit builds for
example.
The current implementation can only distinguish between x86 and x86_64.
This will be extended in future patches. In addition, all 32-bit variants
(i686, i586, etc.) are collapsed into `x86'. An example of the output is:
$ git version --build-options
git version 2.9.3.windows.2.826.g06c0f2f
sizeof-long: 4
machine: x86_64
The label of `machine' was chosen so the new information will approximate
the output of `uname -m'.
Signed-off-by: Adric Norris <landstander668@gmail.com>
Compiling color.c with gcc 6.2.0 using -O3 produces some
-Wmaybe-uninitialized false positives:
color.c: In function ‘color_parse_mem’:
color.c:189:10: warning: ‘bg.blue’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
out += xsnprintf(out, len, "%c8;2;%d;%d;%d", type,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
c->red, c->green, c->blue);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
color.c:208:15: note: ‘bg.blue’ was declared here
struct color bg = { COLOR_UNSPECIFIED };
^~
[ditto for bg.green, bg.red, fg.blue, etc]
This is doubly confusing, because the declaration shows it
being initialized! Even though we do not explicitly
initialize the color components, an incomplete initializer
sets the unmentioned members to zero.
What the warning doesn't show is that we later do this:
struct color c;
if (!parse_color(&c, ...)) {
if (fg.type == COLOR_UNSPECIFIED)
fg = c;
...
}
gcc is clever enough to realize that a struct assignment
from an uninitialized variable taints the destination. But
unfortunately it's _not_ clever enough to realize that we
only look at those members when type is set to COLOR_RGB, in
which case they are always initialized.
With -O2, gcc does not look into parse_color() and must
assume that "c" emerges fully initialized. With -O3, it
inlines parse_color(), and learns just enough to get
confused.
We can silence the false positive by initializing the
temporary "c". This also future-proofs us against
violating the type assumptions (the result would probably
still be buggy, but in a deterministic way).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit e208f9c (make error()'s constant return value more
visible, 2012-12-15) introduced some macro trickery to make
the constant return from error() more visible to callers,
which in turn can help gcc produce better warnings (and
possibly even better code).
Later, fd1d672 (usage.c: add warning_errno() and
error_errno(), 2016-05-08) introduced another variant, and
subsequent commits converted some uses of error() to
error_errno(), losing the magic from e208f9c for those
sites.
As a result, compiling vcs-svn/svndiff.c with "gcc -O3"
produces -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positives (at least
with gcc 6.2.0). Let's give error_errno() the same
treatment, which silences these warnings.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Correct an age-old calco (is that a typo-like word for calc)
in the documentation.
* ls/packet-line-protocol-doc-fix:
pack-protocol: fix maximum pkt-line size
The algorithm in diff-highlight only understands how to look
at two sides of a diff; it cannot correctly handle combined
diffs with multiple preimages. Often highlighting does not
trigger at all for these diffs because the line counts do
not match up. E.g., if we see:
- ours
-theirs
++resolved
we would not bother highlighting; it naively looks like a
single line went away, and then a separate hunk added
another single line.
But of course there are exceptions. E.g., if the other side
deleted the line, we might see:
- ours
++resolved
which looks like we dropped " ours" and added "+resolved".
This is only a small highlighting glitch (we highlight the
space and the "+" along with the content), but it's also the
tip of the iceberg. Even if we learned to find the true
content here (by noticing we are in a 3-way combined diff
and marking _two_ characters from the front of the line as
uninteresting), there are other more complicated cases where
we really do need to handle a 3-way hunk.
Let's just punt for now; we can recognize combined diffs by
the presence of extra "@" symbols in the hunk header, and
treat them as non-diff content.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we have a test suite for diff highlight, we can
show off the improvements from 8d00662 (diff-highlight: do
not split multibyte characters, 2015-04-03).
While we're at it, we can also add another case that
_doesn't_ work: combining code points are treated as their
own unit, which means that we may stick colors between them
and the character they are modifying (with the result that
the color is not shown in an xterm, though it's possible
that other terminals err the other way, and show the color
but not the accent). There's no fix here, but let's
document it as a failure.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These are the same as in the normal t/.gitignore, with the
exception of ".prove", as our Makefile does not support it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This series of branches introduces the git-rebase--helper, a builtin
helping to accelerate the interactive rebase dramatically.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This operation has quadratic complexity, which is especially painful
on Windows, where shell scripts are *already* slow (mainly due to the
overhead of the POSIX emulation layer).
Let's reimplement this with linear complexity (using a hash map to
match the commits' subject lines) for the common case; Sadly, the
fixup/squash feature's design neglected performance considerations,
allowing arbitrary prefixes (read: `fixup! hell` will match the
commit subject `hello world`), which means that we are stuck with
quadratic performance in the worst case.
The reimplemented logic also happens to fix a bug where commented-out
lines (representing empty patches) were dropped by the previous code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The `git commit --fixup` command unwraps wrapped onelines when
constructing the commit message, without wrapping the result.
We need to make sure that `git rebase --autosquash` keeps handling such
cases correctly, in particular since we are about to move the autosquash
handling into the rebase--helper.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In particular on Windows, where shell scripts are even more expensive
than on MacOSX or Linux, it makes sense to move a loop that forks
Git at least once for every line in the todo list into a builtin.
Note: The original code did not try to skip unnecessary picks of root
commits but punts instead (probably --root was not considered common
enough of a use case to bother optimizing). We do the same, for now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In particular on Windows, where shell scripts are even more expensive
than on MacOSX or Linux, it makes sense to move a loop that forks
Git at least once for every line in the todo list into a builtin.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
These tests were a bit anal about the *exact* warning/error message
printed by git rebase. But those messages are intended for the *end
user*, therefore it does not make sense to test so rigidly for the
*exact* wording.
In the following, we will reimplement the missing commits check in
the sequencer, with slightly different words.
So let's just test for the parts in the warning/error message that
we *really* care about, nothing more, nothing less.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
To avoid problems with short SHA-1s that become non-unique during the
rebase, we rewrite the todo script with short/long SHA-1s before and
after letting the user edit the script. Since SHA-1s are not intuitive
for humans, rebase -i also provides the onelines (commit message
subjects) in the script, purely for the user's convenience.
It is very possible to generate a todo script via different means than
rebase -i and then to let rebase -i run with it; In this case, these
onelines are not required.
And this is where the expand/collapse machinery has a bug: it *expects*
that oneline, and failing to find one reuses the previous SHA-1 as
"oneline".
It was most likely an oversight, and made implementation in the (quite
limiting) shell script language less convoluted. However, we are about
to reimplement performance-critical parts in C (and due to spawning a
git.exe process for every single line of the todo script, the
expansion/collapsing of the SHA-1s *is* performance-hampering on
Windows), therefore let's fix this bug to make cross-validation with the
C version of that functionality possible.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The commands used to be indented, and it is nice to look at, but when we
transform the SHA-1s, the indentation is removed. So let's do away with it.
For the moment, at least: when we will use the upcoming rebase--helper
to transform the SHA-1s, we *will* keep the indentation and can
reintroduce it. Yet, to be able to validate the rebase--helper against
the output of the current shell script version, we need to remove the
extra indentation.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is crucial to improve performance on Windows, as the speed is now
mostly dominated by the SHA-1 transformation (because it spawns a new
rev-parse process for *every* line, and spawning processes is pretty
slow from Git for Windows' MSYS2 Bash).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is substantially faster, improving the speedup relative to the
shell script version of the interactive rebase from 2x to 3x on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Now that the sequencer learned to process a "normal" interactive rebase,
we use it. The original shell script is still used for "non-normal"
interactive rebases, i.e. when --root or --preserve-merges was passed.
Please note that the --root option (via the $squash_onto variable) needs
special handling only for the very first command, hence it is still okay
to use the helper upon continue/skip.
Also please note that the --no-ff setting is volatile, i.e. when the
interactive rebase is interrupted at any stage, there is no record of
it. Therefore, we have to pass it from the shell script to the
rebase--helper.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Git's interactive rebase is still implemented as a shell script, despite
its complexity. This implies that it suffers from the portability point
of view, from lack of expressibility, and of course also from
performance. The latter issue is particularly serious on Windows, where
we pay a hefty price for relying so much on POSIX.
Unfortunately, being such a huge shell script also means that we missed
the train when it would have been relatively easy to port it to C, and
instead piled feature upon feature onto that poor script that originally
never intended to be more than a slightly pimped cherry-pick in a loop.
To open the road toward better performance (in addition to all the other
benefits of C over shell scripts), let's just start *somewhere*.
The approach taken here is to add a builtin helper that at first intends
to take care of the parts of the interactive rebase that are most
affected by the performance penalties mentioned above.
Once that is in place, we can work gradually on tackling the rest of the
technical debt.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The shell script version of the interactive rebase has a very specific
final message. Teach the sequencer to print the same.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
For the benefit of e.g. the shell prompt, the interactive rebase not
only displays the progress for the user to see, but also writes it into
the msgnum/end files in the state directory.
Teach the sequencer this new trick.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The interactive rebase keeps the user informed about its progress.
If the sequencer wants to do the grunt work of the interactive
rebase, it also needs to show that progress.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is the behavior of the shell script version of the interactive
rebase, by using the `output` function defined in `git-rebase.sh`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is the behavior of the shell script version of the interactive
rebase, by using the `output` function defined in `git-rebase.sh`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This will be needed to hide the output of `git commit` when the
sequencer handles an interactive rebase's script.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In the upcoming patch, we will support rebase -i's progress
reporting. The progress skips comments but counts 'noop's.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The parsing part of a 'drop' command is almost identical to parsing a
'pick', while the operation is the same as that of a 'noop'.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The interactive rebase has the very special magic that a cherry-pick
that exits with a status different from 0 and 1 signifies a failure to
even record that a cherry-pick was started.
This can happen e.g. when a fast-forward fails because it would
overwrite untracked files.
In that case, we must reschedule the command that we thought we already
had at least started successfully.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The sequencer already has an idea about using different merge
strategies. We just piggy-back on top of that, using rebase -i's
own settings, when running the sequencer in interactive rebase mode.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Git's `rebase` command inspects the `rebase.autostash` config setting
to determine whether it should stash any uncommitted changes before
rebasing and re-apply them afterwards.
As we introduce more bits and pieces to let the sequencer act as
interactive rebase's backend, here is the part that adds support for
the autostash feature.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When continuing after a `pick` command failed, we want that commit
to show up in the rewritten-list (and its notes to be rewritten), too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
