The warning ("builtin/config.c:351: warning: initialization
discards qualifiers from pointer target type") was introduced
in commit 6754497c.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
For a long time, this developer thought that Git's insistence that
pushing into the current branch is evil was completely merited.
Just for fun, the original patch tried to show people that Git is right
there, and that it causes more trouble than it does good when Git allows
you to try to update the working tree for fast-forwards, or to detach the
HEAD, depending on some config settings.
Surprisingly, the opposite was shown.
So here is the support for two new options you can give the config
variable receive.denyCurrentBranch:
'updateInstead':
Try to merge the working tree with the new tip of the branch
(which can lead to really horrible merge conflicts).
'detachInstead':
Detach the HEAD, thereby avoiding a disagreement between the
HEAD and the index (as well as the working tree), possibly
leaving the local user wondering how on earth her HEAD became
so detached.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
At least for cross-platform projects, it makes sense to hide the
files starting with a dot, as this is the behavior on Unix/MacOSX.
However, at least Eclipse has problems interpreting the hidden flag
correctly, so the default is to hide only the .git/ directory.
The config setting core.hideDotFiles therefore supports not only
'true' and 'false', but also 'dotGitOnly'.
[jes: clarified the commit message, made git init respect the setting
by marking the .git/ directory only after reading the config, and added
documentation, and rebased on top of current junio/next]
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
And this uses the gpg-interface.[ch] to allow signing the commit, i.e.
$ git commit --gpg-sign -m foo
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: "Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>"
4096-bit RSA key, ID 96AFE6CB, created 2011-10-03 (main key ID 713660A7)
[master 8457d13] foo
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
The lines of GPG detached signature are placed in new header lines, after
the standard tree/parent/author/committer headers, instead of tucking the
signature block at the end of the commit log message text (similar to how
signed tag is done), for multiple reasons:
- The signature won't clutter output from "git log" and friends if it is
in the extra header. If we place it at the end of the log message, we
would need to teach "git log" and friends to strip the signature block
with an option.
- Teaching new versions of "git log" and "gitk" to optionally verify and
show signatures is cleaner if we structurally know where the signature
block is (instead of scanning in the commit log message).
- The signature needs to be stripped upon various commit rewriting
operations, e.g. rebase, filter-branch, etc. They all already ignore
unknown headers, but if we place signature in the log message, all of
these tools (and third-party tools) also need to learn how a signature
block would look like.
- When we added the optional encoding header, all the tools (both in tree
and third-party) that acts on the raw commit object should have been
fixed to ignore headers they do not understand, so it is not like that
new header would be more likely to break than extra text in the commit.
A commit made with the above sample sequence would look like this:
$ git cat-file commit HEAD
tree 3cd71d90e3db4136e5260ab54599791c4f883b9d
parent b87755351a47b09cb27d6913e6e0e17e6254a4d4
author Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1317862251 -0700
committer Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 1317862251 -0700
gpgsig -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
gpgsig Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
gpgsig
gpgsig iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOjPtrAAoJELC16IaWr+bL4TMP/RSe2Y/jYnCkds9unO5JEnfG
gpgsig ...
gpgsig =dt98
gpgsig -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
foo
but "git log" (unless you ask for it with --pretty=raw) output is not
cluttered with the signature information.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This mostly moves existing code from builtin/tag.c (for signing)
and builtin/verify-tag.c (for verifying) to a new gpg-interface.c
file to provide a more generic library interface.
- sign_buffer() takes a payload strbuf, a signature strbuf, and a signing
key, runs "gpg" to produce a detached signature for the payload, and
appends it to the signature strbuf. The contents of a signed tag that
concatenates the payload and the detached signature can be produced by
giving the same strbuf as payload and signature strbuf.
- verify_signed_buffer() takes a payload and a detached signature as
<ptr, len> pairs, and runs "gpg --verify" to see if the payload matches
the signature. It can optionally capture the output from GPG to allow
the callers to pretty-print it in a way more suitable for their
contexts.
"verify-tag" (aka "tag -v") used to save the whole tag contents as if it
is a detached signature, and fed gpg the payload part of the tag. It
relied on gpg to fail when the given tag is not signed but just is
annotated. The updated run_gpg_verify() function detects the lack of
detached signature in the input, and errors out without bothering "gpg".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* cn/fetch-prune:
fetch: treat --tags like refs/tags/*:refs/tags/* when pruning
fetch: honor the user-provided refspecs when pruning refs
remote: separate out the remote_find_tracking logic into query_refspecs
t5510: add tests for fetch --prune
fetch: free all the additional refspecs
Conflicts:
remote.c
If --tags is specified, add that refspec to the list given to
prune_refs so it knows to treat it as a filter on what refs to
should consider for prunning. This way
git fetch --prune --tags origin
only prunes tags and doesn't delete the branch refs.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user gave us refspecs on the command line, we should use those
when deciding whether to prune a ref instead of relying on the
refspecs in the config.
Previously, running
git fetch --prune origin refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master
would delete every other ref under the origin namespace because we
were using the refspec to filter the available refs but using the
configured refspec to figure out if a ref had been deleted on the
remote. This is clearly the wrong thing to do.
Change prune_refs and get_stale_heads to simply accept a list of
references and a list of refspecs. The caller of either function needs
to decide what refspecs should be used to decide whether a ref is
stale.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/maint-pack-objects-compete-with-delete:
downgrade "packfile cannot be accessed" errors to warnings
pack-objects: protect against disappearing packs
These can happen if another process simultaneously prunes a
pack. But that is not usually an error condition, because a
properly-running prune should have repacked the object into
a new pack. So we will notice that the pack has disappeared
unexpectedly, print a message, try other packs (possibly
after re-scanning the list of packs), and find it in the new
pack.
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's possible that while pack-objects is running, a
simultaneously running prune process might delete a pack
that we are interested in. Because we load the pack indices
early on, we know that the pack contains our item, but by
the time we try to open and map it, it is gone.
Since c715f78, we already protect against this in the normal
object access code path, but pack-objects accesses the packs
at a lower level. In the normal access path, we call
find_pack_entry, which will call find_pack_entry_one on each
pack index, which does the actual lookup. If it gets a hit,
we will actually open and verify the validity of the
matching packfile (using c715f78's is_pack_valid). If we
can't open it, we'll issue a warning and pretend that we
didn't find it, causing us to go on to the next pack (or on
to loose objects).
Furthermore, we will cache the descriptor to the opened
packfile. Which means that later, when we actually try to
access the object, we are likely to still have that packfile
opened, and won't care if it has been unlinked from the
filesystem.
Notice the "likely" above. If there is another pack access
in the interim, and we run out of descriptors, we could
close the pack. And then a later attempt to access the
closed pack could fail (we'll try to re-open it, of course,
but it may have been deleted). In practice, this doesn't
happen because we tend to look up items and then access them
immediately.
Pack-objects does not follow this code path. Instead, it
accesses the packs at a much lower level, using
find_pack_entry_one directly. This means we skip the
is_pack_valid check, and may end up with the name of a
packfile, but no open descriptor.
We can add the same is_pack_valid check here. Unfortunately,
the access patterns of pack-objects are not quite as nice
for keeping lookup and object access together. We look up
each object as we find out about it, and the only later when
writing the packfile do we necessarily access it. Which
means that the opened packfile may be closed in the interim.
In practice, however, adding this check still has value, for
three reasons.
1. If you have a reasonable number of packs and/or a
reasonable file descriptor limit, you can keep all of
your packs open simultaneously. If this is the case,
then the race is impossible to trigger.
2. Even if you can't keep all packs open at once, you
may end up keeping the deleted one open (i.e., you may
get lucky).
3. The race window is shortened. You may notice early that
the pack is gone, and not try to access it. Triggering
the problem without this check means deleting the pack
any time after we read the list of index files, but
before we access the looked-up objects. Triggering it
with this check means deleting the pack means deleting
the pack after we do a lookup (and successfully access
the packfile), but before we access the object. Which
is a smaller window.
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rs/pending:
commit: factor out clear_commit_marks_for_object_array
checkout: use leak_pending flag
bundle: use leak_pending flag
bisect: use leak_pending flag
revision: add leak_pending flag
checkout: use add_pending_{object,sha1} in orphan check
revision: factor out add_pending_sha1
checkout: check for "Previous HEAD" notice in t2020
Conflicts:
builtin/checkout.c
revision.c
* nd/maint-autofix-tag-in-head:
Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD
merge: remove global variable head[]
merge: use return value of resolve_ref() to determine if HEAD is invalid
merge: keep stash[] a local variable
Conflicts:
builtin/merge.c
Implemented internally instead of as "git merge --no-commit && git commit"
so that "merge --edit" is otherwise consistent (hooks, etc) with "merge".
Note: the edit message does not include the status information that one
gets with "commit --status" and it is cleaned up after editing like one
gets with "commit --cleanup=default". A later patch could add the status
information if desired.
Note: previously we were not calling stripspace() after running the
prepare-commit-msg hook. Now we are, stripping comments and
leading/trailing whitespace lines if --edit is given, otherwise only
stripping leading/trailing whitespace lines if not given --edit.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I noticed this when "git am CORRUPTED" unexpectedly failed with an
odd diagnostic, and even removed one of the files it was supposed
to have patched.
Reproduce with any valid old/new patch from which you have removed
the "+++ b/FILE" line. You'll see a diagnostic like this
fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
and you'll find that FILE has been removed.
The above is on glibc-based systems. On other systems, rather than
getting "null", you may provoke a segfault as git tries to
dereference the NULL file name.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* js/no-cherry-pick-head-after-punted:
cherry-pick: do not give irrelevant advice when cherry-pick punted
revert.c: defer writing CHERRY_PICK_HEAD till it is safe to do so
* master:
Update draft release notes to 1.7.8
Fix some "variable might be used uninitialized" warnings
Makefile: fix permissions of mergetools/ checked out with permissive umask
Conflicts:
refs.c
This also fixes an earlier mismerge where I still had sort_ref_array() at
the end of get_ref_dir() which defeats the whole purpose of one of the
topic branches. get_loose_refs() asks get_ref_dir() to recursively fill
the ref array and sorts the result only once.
* mh/check-ref-format-3: (23 commits)
add_ref(): verify that the refname is formatted correctly
resolve_ref(): expand documentation
resolve_ref(): also treat a too-long SHA1 as invalid
resolve_ref(): emit warnings for improperly-formatted references
resolve_ref(): verify that the input refname has the right format
remote: avoid passing NULL to read_ref()
remote: use xstrdup() instead of strdup()
resolve_ref(): do not follow incorrectly-formatted symbolic refs
resolve_ref(): extract a function get_packed_ref()
resolve_ref(): turn buffer into a proper string as soon as possible
resolve_ref(): only follow a symlink that contains a valid, normalized refname
resolve_ref(): use prefixcmp()
resolve_ref(): explicitly fail if a symlink is not readable
Change check_refname_format() to reject unnormalized refnames
Inline function refname_format_print()
Make collapse_slashes() allocate memory for its result
Do not allow ".lock" at the end of any refname component
Refactor check_refname_format()
Change check_ref_format() to take a flags argument
Change bad_ref_char() to return a boolean value
...
* mz/remote-rename:
remote: only update remote-tracking branch if updating refspec
remote rename: warn when refspec was not updated
remote: "rename o foo" should not rename ref "origin/bar"
remote: write correct fetch spec when renaming remote 'remote'
* cb/common-prefix-unification:
rename pathspec_prefix() to common_prefix() and move to dir.[ch]
consolidate pathspec_prefix and common_prefix
remove prefix argument from pathspec_prefix
* jc/request-pull-show-head-4:
environment.c: Fix an sparse "symbol not declared" warning
builtin/log.c: Fix an "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" warning
The previous logic in show_config was to print the delimiter when the
value was set, but Boolean variables have an implicit value "true" when
they appear with no value in the config file. As a result, we got:
git_Config --get-regexp '.*\.Boolean' #1. Ok: example.boolean
git_Config --bool --get-regexp '.*\.Boolean' #2. NO: example.booleantrue
Fix this by defering the display of the separator until after the value
to display has been computed.
Reported-by: Brian Foster <brian.foster@maxim-ic.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In particular, gcc complains as follows:
CC tree-walk.o
tree-walk.c: In function `traverse_trees':
tree-walk.c:347: warning: 'e' might be used uninitialized in this \
function
CC builtin/revert.o
builtin/revert.c: In function `verify_opt_mutually_compatible':
builtin/revert.c:113: warning: 'opt2' might be used uninitialized in \
this function
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This teaches "merge --log" and fmt-merge-msg to use branch description
information when merging a local topic branch into the mainline. The
description goes between the branch name label and the list of commit
titles.
The refactoring to share the common configuration parsing between
merge and fmt-merge-msg needs to be made into a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* js/maint-no-cherry-pick-head-after-punted:
cherry-pick: do not give irrelevant advice when cherry-pick punted
revert.c: defer writing CHERRY_PICK_HEAD till it is safe to do so
Conflicts:
builtin/revert.c
If a cherry-pick did not even start because the working tree had local
changes that would overlap with the operation, we shouldn't be advising
the users to resolve conflicts nor to conclude it with "git commit".
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
