Most problems reported by check-non-portable-shell are accompanied by
advice suggesting how the test author can repair the problem. For
instance:
error: egrep/fgrep obsolescent (use grep -E/-F)
However, when one-shot variable assignment is detected when calling a
shell function (i.e. `VAR=val shell-func`), the problem is reported, but
no advice is given. The lack of advice is particularly egregious since
neither the problem nor the workaround are likely well-known by
newcomers to the project writing tests for the first time. Address this
shortcoming by recommending the use of `test_env` which is tailor made
for this specific use-case.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a0a630192d (t/check-non-portable-shell: detect "FOO=bar
shell_func", 2018-07-13) added the check for one-shot environment
variable assignment for shell functions, the primary reason given for
avoiding them was that, under some shells, the assignment outlives the
invocation of the shell function, thus could potentially negatively
impact subsequent commands in the same test, as well as subsequent
tests.
However, it has recently become apparent that this is not the only
potential problem with one-shot assignments and shell functions. Another
problem is that some shells do not actually export the variable to
commands which the function invokes[1]. More significantly, however, the
behavior of one-shot assignments with shell functions is not specified
by POSIX[2].
Given this new understanding, the presented error message ("assignment
extends beyond 'shell_func'") is too specific and potentially
misleading. Address this by emitting a less specific error message.
(Note that the wording "is not portable" is chosen over the more
specific "behavior not specified by POSIX" for consistency with almost
all other error message issued by this "lint" script.)
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqbk2p9lwi.fsf_-_@gitster.g/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqq34o19jj1.fsf@gitster.g/
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The behavior of a one-shot environment variable assignment of the form
"VAR=val cmd" is unspecified according to POSIX when "cmd" is a shell
function. Indeed the behavior differs between shell implementations and
even different versions of the same shell, thus should be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The behavior of a one-shot environment variable assignment of the form
"VAR=val cmd" is unspecified according to POSIX when "cmd" is a shell
function. Indeed the behavior differs between shell implementations and
even different versions of the same shell. One such problematic behavior
is that, with some shells, the assignment will outlive the invocation of
the function, thus may potentially impact subsequent commands in the
test, as well as subsequent tests. A common way to work around the
problem is to wrap a subshell around the one-shot assignment, thus
ensuring that the assignment is short-lived.
In this test, the subshell is employed precisely for this purpose; other
side-effects of the subshell, such as losing the effect of `test_tick`
which is invoked by `test_commit`, are immaterial.
These days, we can take advantage of `test_commit --author` to more
clearly convey that the test is interested only in overriding the author
of the commit.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --format option on the git-ls-files man page states that `%xx`
interpolates to the character with hex code `xx`. This mirrors the
documentation and behavior of `git for-each-ref --format=...`. However,
in reality it requires the character with code `XX` to be specified as
`%xXX`, mirroring the behaviour of `git log --format`.
Signed-off-by: Jayson Rhynas <jayrhynas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The hashfile API is used to write out a "hashfile", which has a
final checksum (typically SHA-1) at the end. An in-core hashfile
structure has up to two file descriptors and a few buffers that can
only be freed by calling a helper function that is private to the
csum-file implementation.
The usual flow of a user of the API is to first open a file
descriptor for writing, obtain a hashfile associated with that write
file descriptor by calling either hashfd() or hashfd_check(), call
hashwrite() number of times to write data to the file, and then call
finalize_hashfile(), which appends th checksum to the end of the
file, closes file descriptors and releases associated buffers.
But what if a caller finds some error after calling hashfd() to
start the process and/or hashwrite() to send some data to the file,
and wants to abort the operation? The underlying file descriptor is
often managed by the tempfile API, so aborting will clean the file
out of the filesystem, but the resources associated with the in-core
hashfile structure is lost.
Introduce discard_hashfile() API function to allow them to release
the resources held by a hashfile structure the callers want to
dispose of, and use that in read-cache.c:do_write_index(), which is
a central place that writes the index file.
Mark t2107 as leak-free, as this leak in "update-index --cacheinfo"
test that deliberately makes it fail is now plugged.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a named object to read mailmap from is not a blob, the code
correctly errors out, but it forgot to free the object data before
doing so.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation to "git rebase" says that the line numbers (in the
rebased change) may not exactly be the same as the line numbers the
change gets replayed on top of the new base, but uses a wrong noun
"fuzz". It should have said "offset".
They are both terms of art. "fuzz" is about context lines not
exactly matching. "offset" is about the difference in the location
that a change was taken from the original and the change gets
replayed on the target. "offset" is often inevitable and part of
normal life. "fuzz" on the other hand is often a sign of trouble
(and indeed "Git" refuses to apply a change with "fuzz", except
there are options to be fuzzy about whitespaces).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the print command trigger the pager when invoked using a capital
'P', to make it easier for the user to review long hunks.
Note that if the PAGER ends unexpectedly before we've been able to send
the payload, perhaps because the user is not interested in the whole
thing, we might receive a SIGPIPE, which would abruptly and unexpectedly
terminate the interactive session for the user.
Therefore, we need to ignore a possible SIGPIPE signal. Add a test for
this, in addition to the test for normal operation.
For the SIGPIPE test, we need to make sure that we completely fill the
operating system's buffer, otherwise we might not trigger the SIGPIPE
signal. The normal size of this buffer in different OSs varies from a
few KBs to 1MB. Use a payload large enough to guarantee that we exceed
this limit.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since f67b45f862 (Introduce trivial new pager.c helper infrastructure,
2006-02-28) we have the machinery to send our output to a pager.
That machinery, once set up, does not allow us to regain the original
stdio streams.
In the interactive commands (i.e.: add -p) we want to use the pager for
some output, while maintaining the interaction with the user.
Modify the pager machinery so that we can use `setup_pager()` and, once
we've finished sending the desired output for the pager, wait for the
pager termination using a new function `wait_for_pager()`. Make this
function reset the pager machinery before returning.
One specific point to note is that we avoid forking the pager in
`setup_pager()` if the configured pager is an empty string [*1*] or
simply "cat" [*2*]. In these cases, `setup_pager()` does nothing and
therefore `wait_for_pager()` should not be called.
We could modify `setup_pager()` to return an indication of these
situations, so we could avoid calling `wait_for_pager()`.
However, let's avoid transferring that responsibility to the caller and
instead treat the call to `wait_for_pager()` as a no-op when we know we
haven't forked the pager.
1.- 402461aab1 (pager: do not fork a pager if PAGER is set to empty.,
2006-04-16)
2.- caef71a535 (Do not fork PAGER=cat, 2006-04-16)
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We send errors to the pager since 61b80509e3 (sending errors to stdout
under $PAGER, 2008-02-16).
In a8335024c2 (pager: do not dup2 stderr if it is already redirected,
2008-12-15) an exception was introduced to avoid redirecting stderr if
it is not connected to a terminal.
In such exceptional cases, the close(STDERR_FILENO) we're doing in
close_pager_fds, is unnecessary.
Furthermore, in a subsequent commit we're going to introduce changes
that will involve using close_pager_fds multiple times.
With this in mind, controlling when we want to close stderr, become
sensible.
Let's close(STDERR_FILENO) only when necessary, and pave the way for the
upcoming changes.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a test for the 'p' command, which was introduced in 66c14ab592
(add-patch: introduce 'p' in interactive-patch, 2024-03-29).
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I saw some contributors hesitate to give a positive review on
patches by their coworkers. When written well, a positive review
does not have to be a hollow "looks good" that rubber stamps an
useless approval on a topic that is not interesting to others.
Let's add a few paragraphs to encourage positive reviews, which is a
bit harder to give than a review to point out things to improve.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Trivial change to indicate that branches and tags are real options
that can be used combined to get more information. This helps with
linting translations and prompting the user that the terms represent
options.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shopov <ash@kambanaria.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Work around asciidoctor's css that renders `monospace` material
in the SYNOPSIS section of manual pages as block elements.
* js/doc-markup-updates-fix:
Doc: fix Asciidoctor css workaround
asciidoctor: fix `synopsis` rendering
Repacking a repository with multi-pack index started making stupid
pack selections in Git 2.45, which has been corrected.
* ds/midx-write-repack-fix:
midx-write: revert use of --stdin-packs
t5319: add failing test case for repack/expire
The previous step introduced docinfo.html to be used to tweak the
CSS used by the asciidoctor, that by default renders <code> inside
<pre> as a block element, breaking the SYNOPSIS section of a few
pages that adopted a new convention we use since Git 2.45.
But in this project, HTML files are all generated. We do not force
any human to write HTML by hand, which is an unusual and cruel
punishment. "*.html" is in the .gitignore file, and "make clean"
removes them. Having a tracked .html file makes "make clean" make
the tree dirty by removing the tracked docinfo.html file.
Let's do an obvious, minimum and stupid workaround to generate that
file at runtime instead. The mark-up is being rethought in a major
way for the next development cycle, and the CSS workaround we added
in the previous step may have to adjusted, possibly in a large way,
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For 'clang-format', setting 'RemoveBracesLLVM' to 'true', adds a check
to ensure we avoid curly braces for single-statement bodies in
conditional blocks.
However, the option does come with two warnings [1]:
This option will be renamed and expanded to support other styles.
and
Setting this option to true could lead to incorrect code formatting
due to clang-format’s lack of complete semantic information. As
such, extra care should be taken to review code changes made by
this option.
The latter seems to be of concern. While we want to experiment with the
rule, adding it to the in-tree '.clang-format' could affect end-users.
Let's only add it to the CI jobs for now. With time, we can evaluate
its efficacy and decide if we want to add it to '.clang-format' or
retract it entirely. We do so, by adding the existing rules in
'.clang-format' and this rule to a temp file outside the working tree,
which is then used by 'git clang-format'. This ensures we don't murk
with files in-tree.
[1]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#removebracesllvm
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'check-whitespace' CI script exits gracefully if no base commit is
provided or if an invalid revision is provided. This is not good because
if a particular CI provides an incorrect base_commit, it would fail
successfully.
This is exactly the case with the GitLab CI. The CI is using the
"$CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA" variable to get the base commit
SHA, but variable is only defined for _merged_ pipelines. So it is empty
for regular pipelines [1]. This should've failed the check-whitespace
job.
Let's fallback to 'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_DIFF_BASE_SHA' if
"CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA" isn't available in GitLab CI,
similar to the previous commit. Let's also add a check for incorrect
base_commit in the 'check-whitespace.sh' script. While here, fix a small
typo too.
[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/variables/predefined_variables.html#predefined-variables-for-merge-request-pipelines
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't run style checks on our CI, even though we have a
'.clang-format' setup in the repository. Let's add one, the job will
validate only against the new commits added and will only run on merge
requests. Since we're introducing it for the first time, let's allow
this job to fail, so we can validate if this is useful and eventually
enforce it.
For GitHub, we allow the job to pass by adding 'continue-on-error: true'
to the workflow. This means the job would show as passed, even if the
style check failed. To know the status of the job, users have to
manually check the logs.
For GitLab, we allow the job to pass by adding 'allow_failure: true', to
the job. Unlike GitHub, here the job will show as failed with a yellow
warning symbol, but the pipeline would still show as passed.
Also for GitLab, we use the 'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA'
variable by default to obtain the base SHA of the merged pipeline (which
is only available for merged pipelines [1]). Otherwise we use the
'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_DIFF_BASE_SHA' variable.
[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/variables/predefined_variables.html#predefined-variables-for-merge-request-pipelines
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are some spacing rules that we follow in the project and it makes
sense to formalize them:
* Ensure there is no space inserted after the logical not '!' operator.
* Ensure there is no space before the case statement's colon.
* Ensure there is no space before the first bracket '[' of an array.
* Ensure there is no space in empty blocks.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The spacing around colons is currently not standardized and as such we
have the following practices in our code base:
- Spacing around the colon `int bf : 1`: 146 instances
- No spacing around the colon `int bf:1`: 148 instances
- Spacing before the colon `int bf :1`: 6 instances
- Spacing after the colon `int bf: 1`: 12 instances
Let's formalize this by picking the most followed pattern and add the
corresponding style to '.clang-format'.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We do not have a rule around the indentation of preprocessor directives.
This was also discussed on the list [1], noting how there is often
inconsistency in the styling. While there was discussion, there was no
conclusion around what is the preferred style here. One style being
indenting after the hash:
#if FOO
# if BAR
# include <foo>
# endif
#endif
The other being before the hash:
#if FOO
#if BAR
#include <foo>
#endif
#endif
Let's pick the former and add 'IndentPPDirectives: AfterHash' value to
our '.clang-format'. There is no clear reason to pick one over the
other, but it would definitely be nicer to be consistent.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/xmqqwmmm1bw6.fsf@gitster.g
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It was reported that t1460-refs-migrate.sh fails when using Cygwin with
errors like the following:
error: could not link file '.git/ref_migration.sr9pEF/reftable' to '.git/reftable': Permission denied
As some debugging surfaced, the root cause of this is that some files of
the newly-initialized ref store are still open when the target format is
the "reftable" format, and Cygwin refuses to rename open files.
Fix this issue by closing the new ref store before renaming its files
into place. This is a slight change in behaviour compared to before,
where we kept the new ref store open and then updated the repository's
ref store to point to it.
While we could re-open the new ref store after we have moved files
around, this is ultimately unnecessary. We know that the only user of
`repo_migrate_ref_storage_format()` is the git-refs(1) command, and it
won't access the ref store after it has been migrated anyway. So
reinitializing the ref store would be a waste of time. Regardless of
that it is still sensible to leave the repository in a consistent state.
But instead of reinitializing the ref store, we can simply unset the
repo's ref store altogether and let `get_main_ref_store()` lazily
initialize the new ref store as required.
Reported-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Over the years, we accumulated the community wisdom to avoid the
common "one-short export" construct for shell functions, but seem to
have lost on which exact platform it is known to fail. Now during
an investigation on a breakage for a recent topic, we found one
example of failing shell. Let's document that.
This does *not* mean that we can freely start using the construct
once Ubuntu 20.04 is retired. But it does mean that we cannot use
the construct until Ubuntu 20.04 is fully retired from the machines
that matter. Moreover, posix explicitly says that the behaviour for
the construct is unspecified.
Helped-by: Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The second line of the synopsis, starting with [--dry-run] has a
dangling closing paren in the second optional group. Probably added by
mistake, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Nordin <tomasn@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 76880f0510 (doc: git-clone: apply new documentation formatting
guidelines, 2024-03-29), the synopsis of `git clone`'s manual page is
rendered differently than before; Its parent commit did the same for
`git init`.
The result looks quite nice. When rendered with AsciiDoc, that is. When
rendered using AsciiDoctor and displayed in a graphical web browser such
as Firefox, Chrome, Edge, etc, the result is quite unpleasant to my eye,
reading something like this:
SYNOPSIS
git clone
[
--template=
<template-directory>]
[
-l
] [
-s
] [
--no-hardlinks
] [
-q
] [
[... continuing like this ...]
The reason is that AsciiDoctor's default style sheet contains this (see
https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/blob/854923b15533/src/stylesheets/asciidoctor.css#L519-L521
for context):
pre > code {
display: block;
}
It is this `display: block` that forces the parts that are enclosed in
`<code>` tags (such as the `git clone` or the `--template=` part) to be
rendered on their own line.
Side note: This seems not to affect console web browsers like `lynx` or
`w3m`, most likely because most style sheet directions cannot be
respected in text terminals and therefore they seem to punt on style
sheets altogether.
To fix this, let's apply the method recommended by AsciiDoctor in
https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoctor/latest/html-backend/default-stylesheet/#customize-docinfo
to partially override AsciiDoctor's default style sheet so that the
`<code>` sections of the synopsis are no longer each rendered on their
own, individual lines.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/5063.
Even on the Git home page, where AsciiDoctor's default stylesheet is
_not_ used, this change resulted in some unpleasant rendering where not
only the font is changed for the `<code>` sections of the synopsis, but
padding and a different background color make the visual impression
quite uneven. This has been addressed in the meantime, via
https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/commit/a492d0565512.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After the user has edited a hunk the number of lines in the pre- and
post- image lines is recounted the hunk header can be updated before
passing the hunk to "git apply". The recounting code correctly handles
empty context lines where the leading ' ' is omitted by treating '\n'
and '\r' as context lines.
Update this code to use normalize_marker() so that the handling of empty
context lines is consistent with the rest of the hunk parsing
code. There is a small change in behavior as normalize_marker() only
treats "\r\n" as an empty context line rather than any line starting
with '\r'. This should not matter in practice as Macs have used Unix
line endings since MacOs 10 was released in 2001 and if it transpires
that someone is still using an earlier version of MacOs where lines end
with '\r' then we will need to change the handling of '\r' in
normalize_marker() anyway.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "add -p" parses diffs, it looks for context lines starting with a
single space. But when diff.suppressBlankEmpty is in effect, an empty
context line will omit the space, giving us a true empty line. This
confuses the parser, which is unable to split based on such a line.
It's tempting to say that we should just make sure that we generate a
diff without that option. However, although we do not parse hunks that
the user has manually edited with parse_diff() we do allow the user
to split such hunks. As POSIX calls the decision of whether to print the
space here "implementation-defined" we need to handle edited hunks where
empty context lines omit the space.
So let's handle both cases: a context line either starts with a space or
consists of a totally empty line by normalizing the first character to a
space when we parse them. Normalizing the first character rather than
changing the code to check for a space or newline will hopefully future
proof against introducing similar bugs if the code is changed.
Reported-by: Ilya Tumaykin <itumaykin@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Asciidoc.py does not have the concept of generalized roles, whereas
asciidoctor interprets [foo]`blah` as blah with role foo in the
synopsis, making in effect foo disappear in the output. Note that
square brackets not directly followed by an inline markup do not
define a role, which is why we do not have the issue on other parts of
the documentation.
In order to get a consistant result across asciidoctor and
asciidoc.py, the hack is to use the {empty} entity
to split the bracket part from the inline format part.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some "implementation details" of how I perform these integration
tasks day to day have changed since the document was originally
written. Update to reflect the way things are currently done.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "policy" part is more important than the "daily operation" part
in that it establishes why certain maintainer tasks exist and are
performed the way they are.
The text briefly touches the role each integration branches play in
the workflow, but does not give the whole picture of what happens in
a single development cycle using these branches. Extend the
description to describe a whole development cycle.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts b7d6f23a17 (midx-write.c: use `--stdin-packs` when
repacking, 2024-04-01) and then marks the test created in the previous
change as passing.
The fundamental issue with the reverted change is that the focus on
pack-files separates the object selection from how the multi-pack-index
selects a single pack-file for an object ID with multiple copies among
the tracked pack-files.
The change was made with the intention of improving delta compression in
the resulting pack-file, but that can be resolved with the existing
object list mechanism. There are other potential pitfalls of doing an
object walk at this time if the repository is a blobless partial clone,
and that will require additional testing on top of the one that changes
here.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`svn:global-ignores` contains a list of file patterns that should
not be tracked in version control. The syntax of these patterns is
the same as `svn:ignore`. Their semantics differ: patterns in
`svn:global-ignores` apply to all paths under the directory where
they apply, while `svn:ignore` only applies to the directory's
immediate children.
Signed-off-by: Alex Galvin <agalvin@comqi.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subversion 1.8 added a new property `svn:global-ignores`. It
contains a list of patterns used to determine what files should
be ignored. If Git-SVN is going to ignore these files as well, it
is important that we do not skip over directories that have this
property set.
Signed-off-by: Alex Galvin <agalvin@comqi.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git 2.45.0 included the change b7d6f23a17 (midx-write.c: use
`--stdin-packs` when repacking, 2024-04-01) which caused the 'git
multi-pack-index repack' command to use 'git pack-objects --stdin-packs'
instead of listing the objects to repack. While this change was
motivated by efficient cross-process communication and the ability to
improve delta compression, it breaks a fundamental function of the
'incremental-repack' task that is enabled by default in Scalar clones or
Git repositories that run 'git maintenance start'.
The 'incremental-repack' task performs a two-step process of the
'expire' and 'repack' subcommands of the 'git multi-pack-index' builtin.
The 'expire' command removes any pack-files listed in the
multi-pack-index but without any referenced objects. The 'repack' task
then finds a batch of pack-files to repack and sends their objects to
'git pack-objects'. Both the pack-files chosen for the batch and the
objects chosen to repack are based on the ones that the multi-pack-index
references. Objects that appear in a pack-file but have a duplicate copy
in a newer pack-file are not considered in this case. Since the
multi-pack-index references only the newest copy of an object, this
allows the next 'incremental-repack' task to remove the pack-files in
the next 'expire' task. This delay is intentional due to how Windows
handles may block deletion of files with open read handles.
However, the mentioned commit changed this behavior to divorce the set
of objects referenced by the multi-pack-index and instead use a set of
"included" and "excluded" pack-files in the 'git pack-objects' builtin.
When a pack-file is selected as "included", only the objects it contains
but are not in any "excluded" pack-files are considered for repacking.
This has led to client repositories failing to remove old pack-files as
they still have some referenced objects. This grows over time until the
point that Git is trying to repack the same pack-files over and over.
For now, create a test case that demonstrates the expected behavior, but
also fails in its final line. The setup here it attempting to recreate a
typical situation for a repository that uses a blobless partial clone.
There would be a large initial pack-file from the clone that is never
selected in the 'repack' batch. There are other pack-files that have a
combination of new objects from incremental fetches and possibly blobs
that are not connected to those incremental fetches; these blobs could
be filled in from commands like 'git checkout' or 'git blame'. The
pack-files also have some overlap on purpose so test-1 has some
duplicates in test-2 and test-2 has some duplicates in test-3.
At the end of the test, the test-2 pack-file still exists though it
should have been expired. This test will pass when reverting the
offending commit.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
