We `cat` files, but don't inspect or grab the contents in any way. These
`cat` calls look like remnants from a debug session, so it's tempting to
get rid of them. But they do actually verify that the files exist, which
might not necessarily be the case for some failure modes of `git apply
--reject`. Let's not lose that.
Convert the `cat` calls to use `test_path_is_file` instead. This is of
course still a minor change since we no longer verify that the files can
be opened for reading, but that is not something we usually worry about.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The receive.denyCurrentBranch config option controls what happens if
you push to a branch that is checked out into a non-bare repository.
By default, it rejects it. It can be disabled via `ignore` or `warn`.
Another yet trickier option is `updateInstead`.
However, this setting was forgotten when the git worktree command was
introduced: only the main worktree's current branch is respected.
With this change, all worktrees are respected.
That change also leads to revealing another bug,
i.e. `receive.denyCurrentBranch = true` was ignored when pushing into a
non-bare repository's unborn current branch using ref namespaces. As
`is_ref_checked_out()` returns 0 which means `receive-pack` does not get
into conditional statement to switch `deny_current_branch` accordingly
(ignore, warn, refuse, unconfigured, updateInstead).
receive.denyCurrentBranch uses the function `refs_resolve_ref_unsafe()`
(called via `resolve_refdup()`) to resolve the symbolic ref HEAD, but
that function fails when HEAD does not point at a valid commit.
As we replace the call to `refs_resolve_ref_unsafe()` with
`find_shared_symref()`, which has no problem finding the worktree for a
given branch even if it is unborn yet, this bug is fixed at the same
time: receive.denyCurrentBranch now also handles worktrees with unborn
branches as intended even while using ref namespaces.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`receive.denyCurrentBranch` currently has a bug where it allows pushing
into non-bare repository using namespaces as long as it does not have any
commits. This would cause t5509 to fail once that bug is fixed because it
pushes into an unborn current branch.
In t5509, no operations are performed inside `pushee`, as it is only a
target for `git push` and `git ls-remote` calls. Therefore it does not
need to have a worktree. So, it is safe to change `pushee` to a bare
repository.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The transition plan anticipates that we will allow signatures using
multiple algorithms in a single commit. In order to do so, we need to
use a different header per algorithm so that it will be obvious over
which data to compute the signature.
The transition plan specifies that we should use "gpgsig-sha256", so
wire up the commit code such that it can write and parse the current
algorithm, and it can remove the headers for any algorithm when creating
a new commit. Add tests to ensure that we write using the right header
and that git fsck doesn't reject these commits.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test currently hard-codes the hash algorithm as SHA-1 when calling
repo_set_hash_algo so that the_hash_algo is properly initialized.
However, this does not work with SHA-256 repositories. Read the
repository value that repo_init has read into the local repository
variable and set the algorithm based on that value.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The repository helper is used in t5318 to read commit graphs whether
we're in a repository or not. However, without a repository, we have no
way to properly initialize the hash algorithm, meaning that the file is
misread.
Fix this by calling setup_git_directory_gently, which will read the
environment variable the testsuite sets to ensure that the correct hash
algorithm is set.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In this test helper, we read the index. In order to have the proper
hash algorithm set up, we must call setup_git_directory. Do so, so that
the test works when extensions.objectFormat is set.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One of the git for-each-ref tests asks to sort by object ID. However,
when sorted, the order of the refs differs between SHA-1 and SHA-256.
Sort the expected output so that the test passes.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adjust the test so that it computes variables for object IDs instead of
using hard-coded hashes.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the future, we'll allow developers to run the testsuite with a hash
algorithm of their choice. To make this easier, compute the fixed
constants using test_oid. Move the constant initialization down below
the point where test-lib-functions.sh is loaded so the functions are
defined.
Note that we don't provide a value for the OID_REGEX value directly
because writing a large number of instances of "[0-9a-f]" in the
oid-info files is unwieldy and there isn't a way to compute it based on
those values. Instead, compute it based on ZERO_OID.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We can check if certain characters are present in a string by calling
strchr(3) on each of them, or we can pass them all to a single
strpbrk(3) call. The latter is shorter, less repetitive and slightly
more efficient, so let's do that instead.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use test_path_is_file() instead of 'test -f' for better debugging
information.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Jonsson <wasmus@zom.bi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using partial clone, find_non_local_tags() in builtin/fetch.c
checks each remote tag to see if its object also exists locally. There
is no expectation that the object exist locally, but this function
nevertheless triggers a lazy fetch if the object does not exist. This
can be extremely expensive when asking for a commit, as we are
completely removed from the context of the non-existent object and
thus supply no "haves" in the request.
6462d5eb9a (fetch: remove fetch_if_missing=0, 2019-11-05) removed a
global variable that prevented these fetches in favor of a bitflag.
However, some object existence checks were not updated to use this flag.
Update find_non_local_tags() to use OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT in
addition to OBJECT_INFO_QUICK. The _QUICK option only prevents
repreparing the pack-file structures. We need to be extremely careful
about supplying _SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT when we expect an object to not exist
due to updated refs.
This resolves a broken test in t5616-partial-clone.sh.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While testing partial clone, I noticed some odd behavior. I was testing
a way of running 'git init', followed by manually configuring the remote
for partial clone, and then running 'git fetch'. Astonishingly, I saw
the 'git fetch' process start asking the server for multiple rounds of
pack-file downloads! When tweaking the situation a little more, I
discovered that I could cause the remote to hang up with an error.
Add two tests that demonstrate these two issues.
In the first test, we find that when fetching with blob filters from
a repository that previously did not have any tags, the 'git fetch
--tags origin' command fails because the server sends "multiple
filter-specs cannot be combined". This only happens when using
protocol v2.
In the second test, we see that a 'git fetch origin' request with
several ref updates results in multiple pack-file downloads. This must
be due to Git trying to fault-in the objects pointed by the refs. What
makes this matter particularly nasty is that this goes through the
do_oid_object_info_extended() method, so there are no "haves" in the
negotiation. This leads the remote to send every reachable commit and
tree from each new ref, providing a quadratic amount of data transfer!
This test is fixed if we revert 6462d5eb9a (fetch: remove
fetch_if_missing=0, 2019-11-05), but that revert causes other test
failures. The real fix will need more care.
The tests are ordered in this way because if I swap the test order the
tag test will succeed instead of fail. I believe this is because somehow
we need the srv.bare repo to not have any tags when we clone, but then
have tags in our next fetch.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An annotated tag has two names: where it sits in the refs/tags
hierarchy and the tagname recorded in the "tag" field in the object
itself. They usually should match.
Since 212945d4 ("Teach git-describe to verify annotated tag names
before output", 2008-02-28), a commit described using an annotated
tag bases its name on the tagname from the object. While this was a
deliberate design decision to make it easier to converse about tags
with others, even if the tags happen to be fetched to a different
name than it was given by its creator, it had one downside.
The output from "git describe", at least in the modern Git, should
be usable as an object name to name the exact commit given to the
"git describe" command. Using the tagname, when two names differ,
breaks this property, when describing a commit that is directly
pointed at by such a tag. An annotated tag Bob made as "v1.0" may
sit at "refs/tags/v1.0-bob" in the ref hierarchy, and output from
"git describe v1.0-bob^0" would say "v1.0", but there may not be
any tag at "refs/tags/v1.0" locally or there may be another tag that
points at a different object.
Note that this won't be a problem if a commit being described is not
directly pointed at by such a mislocated tag. In the example in the
previous paragraph, describing a commit whose parent is v1.0-bob
would result in "v1.0" (i.e. the tagname taken from the tag object)
followed by "-1-gXXXXX" where XXXXX is the abbreviated object name,
and a string that ends with "-g" followed by a hexadecimal string is
an object name for the object whose name begins with hexadecimal
string (as long as it is unique), so it does not matter if the
leading part is "v1.0" or "v1.0-bob".
Show the name in the long format, i.e. with "-0-gXXXXX" suffix, when
the name we give is based on a mislocated annotated tag to ensure
that the output can be used as the object name for the object
originally given to the command to fix the issue.
While at it, remove an overly cautious dead code to protect against
an annotated tag object without the tagname. Such a tag is filtered
out much earlier in the codeflow, and will not reach this part of
the code.
Helped-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 9e6d3e64 (sparse-checkout: detect short patterns, 2020-01-24), a
condition on the minimum length of a cone-mode pattern was introduced.
However, this condition was off-by-one.
If we have a directory with a single character, say "b", then the
command
git sparse-checkout set b
will correctly add the pattern "/b/" to the sparse-checkout file. When
this is interpeted in dir.c, the pattern is "/b" with the
PATTERN_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR flag. This string has length two, which satisfies
our inclusive inequality (<= 2).
The reason for this inequality is that we will start to read the pattern
string character-by-character using three char pointers: prev, cur,
next. In particular, next is set to the current pattern plus two. The
mistake was that next will still be a valid pointer when the pattern
length is two, since the string is null-terminated.
Make this inequality strict so these patterns work.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "git am --show-current-patch" was added in commit 984913a210 ("am:
add --show-current-patch", 2018-02-12), "git am" started recommending it
as a replacement for .git/rebase-merge/patch. Unfortunately the suggestion
is somewhat misguided; for example, the output of "git am --show-current-patch"
cannot be passed to "git apply" if it is encoded as quoted-printable
or base64. Add a new mode to "git am --show-current-patch" in order to
straighten the suggestion.
Reported-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "git am --show-current-patch" was added in commit 984913a210 ("am:
add --show-current-patch", 2018-02-12), "git am" started recommending it
as a replacement for .git/rebase-merge/patch. Unfortunately the suggestion
is somewhat misguided; for example, the output "git am --show-current-patch"
cannot be passed to "git apply" if it is encoded as quoted-printable or
base64. To simplify worktree operations and to avoid that users poke into
.git, it would be better if "git am" also provided a mode that copies
.git/rebase-merge/patch to stdout.
One possibility could be to have completely separate options, introducing
for example --show-current-message (for .git/rebase-apply/NNNN)
and --show-current-diff (for .git/rebase-apply/patch), while possibly
deprecating --show-current-patch.
That would even remove the need for the first two patches in the series.
However, the long common prefix would have prevented using an abbreviated
option such as "--show". Therefore, I chose instead to add a string
argument to --show-current-patch. The new argument is optional, so that
"git am --show-current-patch"'s behavior remains backwards-compatible.
The next choice to make is how to handle multiple --show-current-patch
options. Right now, something like "git am --abort --show-current-patch"
is rejected, and the previous suggestion would likewise have naturally
rejected a command line like
git am --show-current-message --show-current-diff
Therefore, I decided to also reject for example
git am --show-current-patch=diff --show-current-patch=raw
In other words the whole of --show-current-patch=xxx (including the
optional argument) is treated as the command mode. I found this to be
more consistent and intuitive, even though it differs from the usual
"last one wins" semantics of the git command line.
Add the code to parse submodes based on the above design, where for now
"raw" is the only valid submode. "raw" prints the full e-mail message
just like "git am --show-current-patch".
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before modifying the implementation, ensure that general operation of
OPT_CMDMODE() and detection of incompatible options are covered.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some cases, a user will want to use a specific credential helper for
a wildcard pattern, such as https://*.corp.example.com. We have code
that handles this already with the urlmatch code, so let's use that
instead of our custom code.
Since the urlmatch code is a superset of our current matching in terms
of capabilities, there shouldn't be any cases of things that matched
previously that don't match now. However, in addition to wildcard
matching, we now use partial path matching, which can cause slightly
different behavior in the case that a helper applies to the prefix
(considering path components) of the remote URL. While different, this
is probably the behavior people were wanting anyway.
Since we're using the urlmatch code, we need to encode the components
we've gotten into a URL to match, so add a function to percent-encode
data and format the URL with it. We now also no longer need to the
custom code to match URLs, so let's remove it.
Additionally, the urlmatch code always looks for the best match, whereas
we want all matches for credential helpers to preserve existing
behavior. Let's add an optional field, select_fn, that lets us control
which items we want (in this case, all of them) and default it to the
best-match code that already exists for other users.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <bk2204@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Everywhere else in the codebase, we use the rule that the last matching
configuration option is the one that takes effect. This is helpful
because it allows more specific configuration settings (e.g., per-repo
configuration) to override less specific settings (e.g., per-user
configuration).
However, in the credential code, we didn't honor this setting, and
instead picked the first setting we had, and stuck with it. This was
likely to ensure we picked the value from the URL, which we want to
honor over the configuration.
It's possible to do both, though, so let's check if the value is the one
we've gotten over our protocol connection, which if present will have
come from the URL, and keep it if so. Otherwise, let's overwrite the
value with the latest version we've got from the configuration, so we
keep the last configuration value.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <bk2204@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are some tricky cases in our credential helpers that we don't have
test cases for. To help prevent regressions, let's add some for these
cases:
* If there are multiple configured credential helpers, one without a
path and one with a path, we want to invoke both of them.
* If there are percent-encoded values in the URL, we handle them
properly.
* And finally, if there is a username in the remote URL, we want to
honor that over what the configuration tells us.
Finally, there's an additional case that we'd like to test for as well,
but that currently fails. In all other situations in our configuration,
we pick the last configuration setting that's provided. However, we
fail to do that for credential.username, where we pick the first setting
instead. Let's add a failing test that we have the consistent behavior
here, since that's the documented, expected behavior.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <bk2204@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our urlmatch code handles multiple wildcards, but we don't currently
have a test that checks this code path. Add a test that we handle this
case correctly to avoid any regressions.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <bk2204@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commit fixed a bug with the (no submodule) -> (nested
submodules) transition for commands in the unpack-trees machinery.
Let's add a test for the reverse transition (going from nested
submodules to no submodule), as it is not being tested currently.
While at it, uniformize the capitalization in the list of tests.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using `git checkout --recurse-submodules` to switch between a
branch with no submodules and a branch with initialized nested
submodules currently causes a fatal error:
$ git checkout --recurse-submodules branch-with-nested-submodules
fatal: exec '--super-prefix=submodule/nested/': cd to 'nested'
failed: No such file or directory
error: Submodule 'nested' could not be updated.
error: Submodule 'submodule/nested' cannot checkout new HEAD.
error: Submodule 'submodule' could not be updated.
M submodule
Switched to branch 'branch-with-nested-submodules'
The checkout succeeds but the worktree and index of the first level
submodule are left empty:
$ cd submodule
$ git -c status.submoduleSummary=1 status
HEAD detached at b3ce885
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
deleted: .gitmodules
deleted: first.t
deleted: nested
fatal: not a git repository: 'nested/.git'
Submodule changes to be committed:
* nested 1e96f59...0000000:
$ git ls-files -s
$ # empty
$ ls -A
.git
The reason for the fatal error during the checkout is that a child git
process tries to cd into the yet unexisting nested submodule directory.
The sequence is the following:
1. The main git process (the one running in the superproject) eventually
reaches write_entry() in entry.c, which creates the first level
submodule directory and then calls submodule_move_head() in submodule.c,
which spawns `git read-tree` in the submodule directory.
2. The first child git process (the one in the submodule of the
superproject) eventually calls check_submodule_move_head() at
unpack_trees.c:2021, which calls submodule_move_head in dry-run mode,
which spawns `git read-tree` in the nested submodule directory.
3. The second child git process tries to chdir() in the yet unexisting
nested submodule directory in start_command() at run-command.c:829 and
dies before exec'ing.
The reason why check_submodule_move_head() is reached in the first child
and not in the main process is that it is inside an
if(submodule_from_ce()) construct, and submodule_from_ce() returns a
valid struct submodule pointer, whereas it returns a null pointer in the
main git process.
The reason why submodule_from_ce() returns a null pointer in the main
git process is because the call to cache_lookup_path() in config_from()
(called from submodule_from_path() in submodule_from_ce()) returns a
null pointer since the hashmap "for_path" in the submodule_cache of
the_repository is not yet populated. It is not populated because both
repo_get_oid(repo, GITMODULES_INDEX, &oid) and repo_get_oid(repo,
GITMODULES_HEAD, &oid) in config_from_gitmodules() at
submodule-config.c:639-640 return -1, as at this stage of the operation,
neither the HEAD of the superproject nor its index contain any
.gitmodules file.
In contrast, in the first child the hashmap is populated because
repo_get_oid(repo, GITMODULES_HEAD, &oid) returns 0 as the HEAD of the
first level submodule, i.e. .git/modules/submodule/HEAD, points to a
commit where .gitmodules is present and records 'nested' as a submodule.
Fix this bug by checking that the submodule directory exists before
calling check_submodule_move_head() in merged_entry() in the `if(!old)`
branch, i.e. if going from a commit with no submodule to a commit with a
submodule present.
Also protect the other call to check_submodule_move_head() in
merged_entry() the same way as it is safer, even though the `else if
(!(old->ce_flags & CE_CONFLICTED))` branch of the code is not at play in
the present bug.
The other calls to check_submodule_move_head() in other functions in
unpack_trees.c are all already protected by calls to lstat() somewhere
in
the program flow so we don't need additional protection for them.
All commands in the unpack_trees machinery are affected, i.e. checkout,
reset and read-tree when called with the --recurse-submodules flag.
This bug was first reported in [1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/7437BB59-4605-48EC-B05E-E2BDB2D9DABC@gmail.com/
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Damien Robert <damien.olivier.robert@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test "$command: submodule branch is not changed, detach HEAD
instead" is in the "Appearing submodule" section of
test_submodule_recursing_with_args_common(), but this test updates a
submodule; it does not test a transition from a state with no submodule
to a state with a submodule.
As such, for consistency, move it to the "Modified submodule" section of
the same function. While at it, add a comment describing the test.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commands in the unpack_trees machinery (checkout, reset, read-tree)
were fixed in 218c883783 (submodule: properly recurse for read-tree and
checkout, 2017-05-02) to correctly update nested submodules when called
with the `--recurse-submodules` flag.
However, a comment in t/lib-submodule-update.sh mentions that this use
case still doesn't work.
Remove this outdated comment.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The known failure mode KNOWN_FAILURE_SUBMODULE_RECURSIVE_NESTED was
removed from lib-submodule-update.sh in 218c883783 (submodule: properly
recurse for read-tree and checkout, 2017-05-02) but at that time this
change was not ported over to topic sb/reset-recurse-submodules, such
that when this topic was merged in 5f074ca7e8 (Merge branch
'sb/reset-recurse-submodules', 2017-05-29), t7112-reset-submodules.sh
kept a mention of this removed failure mode.
Remove it now, as it does not mean anything anymore.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Decisions taken for simplicity:
1) For now, `--pathspec-from-file` is declared incompatible with
`--patch`, even when <file> is not `-`. Such use case is not
really expected.
2) It is not allowed to pass pathspec in both args and file.
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Eliminate crude option parsing and rely on real parsing instead, because
1) Crude parsing is crude, for example it's not capable of
handling things like `git stash -m Message`
2) Adding options in two places is inconvenient and prone to bugs
As a side result, the case of `git stash -m Message` gets fixed.
Also give a good error message instead of just throwing usage at user.
----
Some review of what's been happening to this code:
Before [1], `git-stash.sh` only verified that all args begin with `-` :
# The default command is "push" if nothing but options are given
seen_non_option=
for opt
do
case "$opt" in
--) break ;;
-*) ;;
*) seen_non_option=t; break ;;
esac
done
Later, [1] introduced the duplicate code I'm now removing, also making
the previous test more strict by white-listing options.
----
[1] Commit 40af1468 ("stash: convert `stash--helper.c` into `stash.c`" 2019-02-26)
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Decisions taken for simplicity:
1) It is not allowed to pass pathspec in both args and file.
Adjustments were needed for `if (!argc)` block:
This code actually means "pathspec is not present". Previously, pathspec
could only come from commandline arguments, so testing for `argc` was a
valid way of testing for the presence of pathspec. But this is no longer
true with `--pathspec-from-file`.
During the entire `--pathspec-from-file` story, I tried to keep its
behavior very close to giving pathspec on commandline, so that switching
from one to another doesn't involve any surprises.
However, throwing usage at user in the case of empty
`--pathspec-from-file` would puzzle because there's nothing wrong with
"usage" (that is, argc/argv array).
On the other hand, throwing usage in the old case also feels bad to me.
While it's less of a puzzle, I (as user) never liked the experience of
comparing my commandline to "usage", trying to spot a difference. Since
it's already known what the error is, it feels a lot better to give that
specific error to user.
Judging from [1] it doesn't seem that showing usage in this case was
important (the patch was to avoid segfault), and it doesn't fit into how
other commands react to empty pathspec (see for example `git add` with a
custom message).
Therefore, I decided to show new error text in both cases. In order to
continue testing for error early, I moved `parse_pathspec()` higher. Now
it happens before `read_cache()` / `hold_locked_index()` /
`setup_work_tree()`, which shouldn't cause any issues.
[1] Commit 7612a1ef ("git-rm: honor -n flag" 2006-06-09)
Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we need to delete a higher stage entry in the index to place the file
at stage 0, then we'll lose that file's stat information. In such
situations we may still be able to detect that the file on disk is the
version we want (as noted by our comment in the code:
/* do not overwrite file if already present */
), but we do still need to update the mtime since we are creating a new
cache_entry for that file. Update the logic used to determine whether
we refresh a file's mtime.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A user discovered a case where they had a stack of 20 simple commits to
rebase, and the rebase would succeed in picking the first commit and
then error out with a pair of "Could not execute the todo command" and
"Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by
merge" messages.
Their steps actually made use of the -i flag, but I switched it over to
-m to make it simpler to trigger the bug. With that flag, it bisects
back to commit 68aa495b59 (rebase: implement --merge via the
interactive machinery, 2018-12-11), but that's misleading. If you
change the -m flag to --keep-empty, then the problem persists and will
bisect back to 356ee4659b (sequencer: try to commit without forking
'git commit', 2017-11-24)
After playing with the testcase for a bit, I discovered that added
--exec "sleep 1" to the command line makes the rebase succeed, making me
suspect there is some kind of discard and reloading of caches that lead
us to believe that something is stat dirty, but I didn't succeed in
digging any further than that.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
check-ignore has two different modes, and neither of these modes has an
implementation that matches the documentation. These modes differ in
whether they just print paths or whether they also print the final
pattern matched by the path. The fix is different for both modes, so
I'll discuss both separately.
=== First (default) mode ===
The first mode is documented as:
For each pathname given via the command-line or from a file via
--stdin, check whether the file is excluded by .gitignore (or other
input files to the exclude mechanism) and output the path if it is
excluded.
However, it fails to do this because it did not account for negated
patterns. Commands other than check-ignore verify exclusion rules via
calling
... -> treat_one_path() -> is_excluded() -> last_matching_pattern()
while check-ignore has a call path of the form:
... -> check_ignore() -> last_matching_pattern()
The fact that the latter does not include the call to is_excluded()
means that it is susceptible to to messing up negated patterns (since
that is the only significant thing is_excluded() adds over
last_matching_pattern()). Unfortunately, we can't make it just call
is_excluded(), because the same codepath is used by the verbose mode
which needs to know the matched pattern in question. This brings us
to...
=== Second (verbose) mode ===
The second mode, known as verbose mode, references the first in the
documentation and says:
Also output details about the matching pattern (if any) for each
given pathname. For precedence rules within and between exclude
sources, see gitignore(5).
The "Also" means it will print patterns that match the exclude rules as
noted for the first mode, and also print which pattern matches. Unless
more information is printed than just pathname and pattern (which is not
done), this definition is somewhat ill-defined and perhaps even
self-contradictory for negated patterns: A path which matches a negated
exclude pattern is NOT excluded and thus shouldn't be printed by the
former logic, while it certainly does match one of the explicit patterns
and thus should be printed by the latter logic.
=== Resolution ==
Since the second mode exists to find out which pattern matches given
paths, and showing the user a pattern that begins with a '!' is
sufficient for them to figure out whether the pattern is excluded, the
existing behavior is desirable -- we just need to update the
documentation to match the implementation (i.e. it is about printing
which pattern is matched by paths, not about showing which paths are
excluded).
For the first or default mode, users just want to know whether a pattern
is excluded. As such, the existing documentation is desirable; change
the implementation to match the documented behavior.
Finally, also adjust a few tests in t0008 that were caught up by this
discrepancy in how negated paths were handled.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Code clean-up.
* jk/mailinfo-cleanup:
mailinfo: factor out some repeated header handling
mailinfo: be more liberal with header whitespace
mailinfo: simplify parsing of header values
mailinfo: treat header values as C strings
"git config" learned to show in which "scope", in addition to in
which file, each config setting comes from.
* mr/show-config-scope:
config: add '--show-scope' to print the scope of a config value
submodule-config: add subomdule config scope
config: teach git_config_source to remember its scope
config: preserve scope in do_git_config_sequence
config: clarify meaning of command line scoping
config: split repo scope to local and worktree
config: make scope_name non-static and rename it
t1300: create custom config file without special characters
t1300: fix over-indented HERE-DOCs
config: fix typo in variable name
Preparation for SHA-256 migration continues.
* bc/hash-independent-tests-part-8: (21 commits)
t6024: update for SHA-256
t6006: make hash size independent
t6000: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t5703: make test work with SHA-256
t5607: make hash size independent
t5318: update for SHA-256
t5515: make test hash independent
t5321: make test hash independent
t5313: make test hash independent
t5309: make test hash independent
t5302: make hash size independent
t4060: make test work with SHA-256
t4211: add test cases for SHA-256
t4211: move SHA-1-specific test cases into a directory
t4013: make test hash independent
t3311: make test work with SHA-256
t3310: make test work with SHA-256
t3309: make test work with SHA-256
t3308: make test work with SHA-256
t3206: make hash size independent
...
Two related changes, with separate rationale for each:
Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because:
* 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used
for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used
in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones
given that we are making it the default.
* 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is.
* the directory where state is stored is not called
.git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge.
Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because:
* Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point.
* Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the
documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read
it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large
burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very
careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces
annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems.
* Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a
backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the
alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user
tries to explain to another what they are doing.
* While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am
is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools
for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too.
* The directory where state is stored has never been called
.git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply.
For all the reasons listed above:
* Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names
* Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names
to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere
(e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation)
* Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply
* Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new
backend names for us as well.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to ensure the merge/interactive backend gets similar coverage
to the am one, add some tests for cases where previously only the am
backend was tested.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have many rebase tests in the testsuite, and often the same test is
repeated multiple times just testing different backends. For those
tests that were specifically trying to test the am backend, add the --am
flag.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A large variety of rebase types are supported by the interactive
machinery, not just the explicitly interactive ones. These all share
the same code and write the same reflog messages, but the "-i" moniker
in those messages doesn't really have much meaning. It also becomes
somewhat distracting once we switch the default from the am-backend to
the interactive one. Just remove the "-i" from these messages.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the past, we had different prompts for different types of rebases:
REBASE: for am-based rebases
REBASE-m: for merge-based rebases
REBASE-i: for interactive-based rebases
It's not clear why this distinction was necessary or helpful; when the
prompt was added in commit e75201963f ("Improve bash prompt to detect
various states like an unfinished merge", 2007-09-30), it simply added
these three different types. Perhaps there was a useful purpose back
then, but there have been some changes:
* The merge backend was deleted after being implemented on top of the
interactive backend, causing the prompt for merge-based rebases to
change from REBASE-m to REBASE-i.
* The interactive backend is used for multiple different types of
non-interactive rebases, so the "-i" part of the prompt doesn't
really mean what it used to.
* Rebase backends have gained more abilities and have a great deal of
overlap, sometimes making it hard to distinguish them.
* Behavioral differences between the backends have also been ironed
out.
* We want to change the default backend from am to interactive, which
means people would get "REBASE-i" by default if we didn't change
the prompt, and only if they specified --am or --whitespace or -C
would they get the "REBASE" prompt.
* In the future, we plan to have "--whitespace", "-C", and even "--am"
run the interactive backend once it can handle everything the
am-backend can.
For all these reasons, make the prompt for any type of rebase just be
"REBASE".
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the past, we dis-allowed rebases using the interactive backend from
performing a fast-forward to short-circuit the rebase operation. This
made sense for explicitly interactive rebases and some implicitly
interactive rebases, but certainly became overly stringent when the
merge backend was re-implemented via the interactive backend.
Just as the am-based rebase has always had to disable the fast-forward
based on a variety of conditions or flags (e.g. --signoff, --whitespace,
etc.), we need to do the same but now with a few more options. However,
continuing to use REBASE_FORCE for tracking this is problematic because
the interactive backend used it for a different purpose. (When
REBASE_FORCE wasn't set, the interactive backend would not fast-forward
the whole series but would fast-forward individual "pick" commits at the
beginning of the todo list, and then a squash or something would cause
it to start generating new commits.) So, introduce a new
allow_preemptive_ff flag contained within cmd_rebase() and use it to
track whether we are going to allow a pre-emptive fast-forward that
short-circuits the whole rebase.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t3432 had several stress tests for can_fast_forward(), whose intent was
to ensure we were using the optimization of just fast forwarding when
possible. However, these tests verified that fast forwards had happened
based on the output that rebase printed to the terminal. We can instead
test more directly that we actually fast-forwarded by checking the
reflog, which also has the side effect of making the tests applicable
for the merge/interactive backend.
This change does lose the distinction between "noop" and "noop-force",
but as stated in commit c9efc21683 ("t3432: test for --no-ff's
interaction with fast-forward", 2019-08-27) which introduced that
distinction: "These tests aren't supposed to endorse the status quo,
just test for what we're currently doing.".
This change does not actually run these tests with the merge/interactive
backend; instead this is just a preparatory commit. A subsequent commit
which fixes can_fast_forward() to work with that backend will then also
change t3432 to add tests of that backend as well.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
restrict_revision in the original shell script was an excluded revision
range. It is also treated that way by the am-backend. In the
conversion from shell to C (see commit 6ab54d17be ("rebase -i:
implement the logic to initialize $revisions in C", 2018-08-28)), the
interactive-backend accidentally treated it as a positive revision
rather than a negated one.
This was missed as there were no tests in the testsuite that tested an
interactive rebase with fork-point behavior.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
