When changing a directory to a symlink on one side of history, and
renaming the parent of that directory to a different directory name
on the other side, e.g. with this kind of setup:
Base commit: Has a file named dir/subdir/file
Side1: Rename dir/ -> renamed-dir/
Side2: delete dir/subdir/file, add dir/subdir as symlink
Then merge-ort was running into an assertion failure:
git: merge-ort.c:2622: apply_directory_rename_modifications: Assertion `ci->dirmask == 0' failed
merge-recursive did not have as obvious an issue handling this case,
likely because we never fixed it to handle the case from commit
902c521a35 ("t6423: more involved directory rename test", 2020-10-15)
where we need to be careful about nested renames when a directory rename
occurs (dir/ -> renamed-dir/ implies dir/subdir/ ->
renamed-dir/subdir/). However, merge-recursive does have multiple
problems with this testcase:
* Incorrect stages for the file: merge-recursive omits the stage in
the index corresponding to the base stage, making `git status`
report "added by us" for renamed-dir/subdir/file instead of the
expected "deleted by them".
* Poor directory/file conflict handling: For the renamed-dir/subdir
symlink, instead of reporting a file/directory conflict as
expected, it reports "Error: Refusing to lose untracked file at
renamed-dir/subdir". This is a lie because there is no untracked
file at that location. It then does the normal suboptimal
merge-recursive thing of having the symlink be tracked in the index
at a location where it can't be written due to D/F conflicts
(namely, renamed-dir/subdir), but writes it to the working tree at
a different location as a new untracked file (namely,
renamed-dir/subdir~B^0)
Technically, these problems don't prevent the user from resolving the
merge if they can figure out to ignore the confusion, but because both
pieces of output are quite confusing I don't want to modify the test
to claim the recursive also passes it even if it doesn't have the bug
that ort did.
So, fix the bug in ort by splitting the conflict_info for "dir/subdir"
into two, one for the directory part, one for the file (i.e. symlink)
part, since the symlink is being renamed by directory rename detection.
The directory part is needed for proper nesting, since there are still
conflict_info fields for files underneath it (though those are marked
as is_null, they are still present until the entries are processed,
and the entry processing wants every non-toplevel entry to have a
parent directory).
Reported-by: Stefano Rivera <stefano@rivera.za.net>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After we've successfully finished the repack, we call
remove_temporary_files(), which looks for and removes any files matching
".tmp-$$-pack-*", where $$ is the pid of the current process. But this
is pointless. If we make it this far in the process, we've already
renamed these tempfiles into place, and there is nothing left to delete.
Nor is there a point in trying to call it to clean up when we _aren't_
successful. It's not safe for using in a signal handler, and the
previous commit already handed that job over to the tempfile API.
It might seem like it would be useful to clean up stray .tmp files left
by other invocations of git-repack. But it won't clean those files; it
only matches ones with its pid, and leaves the rest. Fortunately, those
are cleaned up naturally by successive calls to git-repack; we'll
consider .tmp-*.pack the same as normal packfiles, so "repack -ad", etc,
will roll up their contents and eventually delete them.
The one case that could matter is if pack-objects generates an extension
we don't know about, like ".tmp-pack-$$-$hash.some-new-ext". The current
code will quietly delete such a file, while after this patch we'd leave
it in place. In practice this doesn't happen, and would be indicative of
a bug. Leaving the file as cruft is arguably a better behavior, as it
means somebody is more likely to eventually notice and fix the bug. If
we really wanted to be paranoid, we could scan for and warn about such
files, but that seems like overkill.
There's nothing to test with regard to the removal of this function. It
was doing nothing, so the behavior should be the same. However, we can
verify (and protect) our assumption that "repack -ad" will eventually
remove stray files by adding a test for that.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git-repack exits due to a signal, it tries to clean up by calling
its remove_temporary_files() function, which walks through the packs dir
looking for ".tmp-$$-pack-*" files to delete (where "$$" is the pid of
the current process).
The biggest problem here is that remove_temporary_files() is not safe to
call in a signal handler. It uses opendir(), which isn't on the POSIX
async-signal-safe list. The details will be platform-specific, but a
likely issue is that it needs to allocate memory; if we receive a signal
while inside malloc(), etc, we'll conflict on the allocator lock and
deadlock with ourselves.
We can fix this by just cleaning up the files directly, without walking
the directory. We already know the complete list of .tmp-* files that
were generated, because we recorded them via populate_pack_exts(). When
we find files there, we can use register_tempfile() to record the
filenames. If we receive a signal, then the tempfile API will clean them
up for us, and it's async-safe and pretty battle-tested.
Note that this is slightly racier than the existing scheme. We don't
record the filenames until pack-objects tells us the hash over stdout.
So during the period between it generating the file and reporting the
hash, we'd fail to clean up. However, that period is very small. During
most of the pack generation process pack-objects is using its own
internal tempfiles. It's only at the very end that it moves them into
the names git-repack expects, and then it immediately reports the name
to us. Given that cleanup like this is best effort (after all, we may
get SIGKILL), this level of race is acceptable.
When we register the tempfiles, we'll record them locally and use the
result to call rename_tempfile(), rather than renaming by hand. This
isn't strictly necessary, as once we've renamed the files they're gone,
and the tempfile API's cleanup unlink() would simply become a pointless
noop. But managing the lifetimes of the tempfile objects is the cleanest
thing to do, and the tempfile pointers naturally fill the same role as
the old booleans.
This patch also fixes another small problem. We only hook signals, and
don't set up an atexit handler. So if we see an error that causes us to
die(), we'll leave the .tmp-* files in place. But since the tempfile API
handles this for us, this is now fixed for free. The new test covers
this by stimulating a failure of pack-objects when generating a cruft
pack. Before this patch, the .tmp-* file for the main pack would have
been left, but now we correctly clean it up.
Two small subtleties on the implementation:
- in the renaming loop, we can stop re-constructing fname_old; we only
use it when we have a tempfile to rename, so we can just ask the
tempfile for its path (which, barring bugs, should be identical)
- when renaming fails, our error message mentions fname_old. But since
a failed rename_tempfile() invalidates the tempfile struct, we'll
lose access to that string. Instead, let's mention the destination
filename, which is what most other callers do.
Reported-by: Jan Pokorný <poki@fnusa.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some variables in 'test_commit' have names that are common enough that
it is very likely that test authors might use them in a test. If they do
so and use 'test_commit' between setting such a variable and using it,
the variable value from 'test_commit' will leak back into the test and
most likely break it.
Prevent that by marking all variables in 'test_commit' as 'local'. This
allow a subsequent commit to use a 'tag' variable.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --edit-description @{-1}" is now a way to edit branch
description of the branch you were on before switching to the
current branch.
* rj/branch-edit-description-with-nth-checkout:
branch: support for shortcuts like @{-1}, completed
Giving "--invert-grep" and "--all-match" without "--grep" to the
"git log" command resulted in an attempt to access grep pattern
expression structure that has not been allocated, which has been
corrected.
* ab/grep-simplify-extended-expression:
grep.c: remove "extended" in favor of "pattern_expression", fix segfault
After checking out a "branch" that is a symbolic-ref that points at
another branch, "git symbolic-ref HEAD" reports the underlying
branch, not the symbolic-ref the user gave checkout as argument.
The command learned the "--no-recurse" option to stop after
dereferencing a symbolic-ref only once.
* jc/symbolic-ref-no-recurse:
symbolic-ref: teach "--[no-]recurse" option
In 7f5397a07c (cmake: support for testing git when building out of the
source tree, 2020-06-26), we implemented support for running Git's test
scripts even after building Git in a different directory than the source
directory.
The way we did this was to edit the file `t/test-lib.sh` to override
`GIT_BUILD_DIR` to point somewhere else than the parent of the `t/`
directory.
This is unideal because it always leaves a tracked file marked as
modified, and it is all too easy to commit that change by mistake.
Let's change the strategy by teaching `t/test-lib.sh` to detect the
presence of a file called `GIT-BUILD-DIR` in the source directory. If it
exists, the contents are interpreted as the location to the _actual_
build directory. We then write this file as part of the CTest
definition.
To support building Git via a regular `make` invocation after building
it using CMake, we ensure that the `GIT-BUILD-DIR` file is deleted (for
convenience, this is done as part of the Makefile rule that is already
run with every `make` invocation to ensure that `GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS` is
up to date).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`git repack` supports a `--pack-kept-objects` flag which more or less
translates to whether or not we pass `--honor-pack-keep` down to `git
pack-objects` when assembling a new pack.
This behavior has existed since ee34a2bead (repack: add
`repack.packKeptObjects` config var, 2014-03-03). In that commit, the
documentation was extended to say:
[...] Note that we still do not delete `.keep` packs after
`pack-objects` finishes.
Unfortunately, this is not the case when `--pack-kept-objects` is
combined with a `--geometric` repack. When doing a geometric repack, we
include `.keep` packs when enumerating available packs only when
`pack_kept_objects` is set.
So this all works fine when `--no-pack-kept-objects` (or similar) is
given. Kept packs are excluded from the geometric roll-up, so when we go
to delete redundant packs (with `-d`), no `.keep` packs appear "below
the split" in our geometric progression.
But when `--pack-kept-objects` is given, things can go awry. Namely,
when a kept pack is included in the list of packs tracked by the
`pack_geometry` struct *and* part of the pack roll-up, we will delete
the `.keep` pack when we shouldn't.
Note that this *doesn't* result in object corruption, since the `.keep`
pack's objects are still present in the new pack. But the `.keep` pack
itself is removed, which violates our promise from back in ee34a2bead.
But there's more. Because `repack` computes the geometric roll-up
independently from selecting which packs belong in a MIDX (with
`--write-midx`), this can lead to odd behavior. Consider when a `.keep`
pack appears below the geometric split (ie., its objects will be part of
the new pack we generate).
We'll write a MIDX containing the new pack along with the existing
`.keep` pack. But because the `.keep` pack appears below the geometric
split line, we'll (incorrectly) try to remove it. While this doesn't
corrupt the repository, it does cause us to remove the MIDX we just
wrote, since removing that pack would invalidate the new MIDX.
Funny enough, this behavior became far less noticeable after e4d0c11c04
(repack: respect kept objects with '--write-midx -b', 2021-12-20), which
made `pack_kept_objects` be enabled by default only when we were writing
a non-MIDX bitmap.
But e4d0c11c04 didn't resolve this bug, it just made it harder to notice
unless callers explicitly passed `--pack-kept-objects`.
The solution is to avoid trying to remove `.keep` packs during
`--geometric` repacks, even when they appear below the geometric split
line, which is the approach this patch implements.
Co-authored-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we write a MIDX bitmap after repacking, it is possible that the
repository would be left in a state with both pack- and multi-pack
reachability bitmaps.
This can occur, for instance, if a pack that was kept (either by having
a .keep file, or during a geometric repack in which it is not rolled up)
has a bitmap file, and the repack wrote a multi-pack index and bitmap.
When loading a reachability bitmap for the repository, the multi-pack
one is always preferred, so the pack-based one is redundant. Let's
remove it unconditionally, even if '-d' isn't passed, since there is no
practical reason to keep both around. The patch below does just that.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
String-lists may be used with callbacks for clearing or iteration. These
callbacks need to conform to a particular interface, even though not
every callback needs all of its parameters. Mark the unused ones to make
-Wunused-parameter happy.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --edit-description" on an unborh branch misleadingly
said that no such branch exists, which has been corrected.
* rj/branch-edit-desc-unborn:
branch: description for non-existent branch errors
Remove error detection from a function that fetches from promisor
remotes, and make it die when such a fetch fails to bring all the
requested objects, to give an early failure to various operations.
* jt/promisor-remote-fetch-tweak:
promisor-remote: die upon failing fetch
promisor-remote: remove a return value
"GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description" resulted in failure,
which has been corrected.
* jc/branch-description-unset:
branch: do not fail a no-op --edit-desc
Code clean-up.
* jk/cleanup-callback-parameters:
attr: drop DEBUG_ATTR code
commit: avoid writing to global in option callback
multi-pack-index: avoid writing to global in option callback
test-submodule: inline resolve_relative_url() function
When aborting a rebase the reflog message looks like
rebase (abort): updating HEAD
which is not very informative. Improve the message by mentioning the
branch that we are returning to as we do at the end of a successful
rebase so it looks like.
rebase (abort): returning to refs/heads/topic
If GIT_REFLOG_ACTION is set in the environment we no longer omit
"(abort)" from the reflog message. We don't omit "(start)" and
"(finish)" when starting and finishing a rebase in that case so we
shouldn't omit "(abort)".
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The apply backend creates slightly different reflog messages to the
merge backend when starting or finishing a rebase and when picking
commits. These differences make it harder than it needs to be to parse
the reflog (I have a script that reads the finishing messages from
rebase and it is a pain to have to accommodate two different message
formats). While it is possible to determine the backend used for a
rebase from the reflog messages, the differences are not designed for
that purpose. c2417d3af7 (rebase: drop '-i' from the reflog for
interactive-based rebases, 2020-02-15) removed the clear distinction
between the reflog messages of the two backends without complaint.
As the merge backend is the default it is likely to be the format most
common in existing reflogs. For that reason the apply backend is changed
to format its reflog messages to match the merge backend as closely as
possible. Note that there is still a difference as when committing a
conflict resolution the apply backend will use "(pick)" rather than
"(continue)" because it is not currently possible to change the message
for a single commit.
In addition to c2417d3af7 we also changed the reflog messages in
68aa495b59 (rebase: implement --merge via the interactive machinery,
2018-12-11) and 2ac0d6273f (rebase: change the default backend from "am"
to "merge", 2020-02-15). This commit makes the same change to "git
rebase --apply" that 2ac0d6273f made to "git rebase" without any backend
specific options. As the messages are changed to use an existing format
any scripts that can parse the reflog messages of the default rebase
backend should be unaffected by this change.
There are existing tests for the messages from both backends which are
adjusted to ensure that they do not get out of sync in the future.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog messages when finishing a rebase hard code "rebase" rather
than using GIT_REFLOG_ACTION.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog message for every pick after running "rebase --skip" looks
like
rebase (skip) (pick): commit subject line
Fix this by not appending " (skip)" to the reflog action.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog message for a conflict resolution committed by "rebase
--continue" looks like
rebase (continue): commit subject line
Unfortunately the reflog message each subsequent pick look like
rebase (continue) (pick): commit subject line
Fix this by setting the reflog message for "rebase --continue" in
sequencer_continue() so it does not affect subsequent commits. This
introduces a memory leak similar to the one leaking GIT_REFLOG_ACTION
in pick_commits(). Both of these will be fixed in a future series that
stops the sequencer calling setenv().
If we fail to commit the staged changes then we error out so
GIT_REFLOG_ACTION does not need to be reset in that case.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refactor the tests in preparation for adding more tests in the next
few commits. The reworked tests use the same function for testing both
the "merge" and "apply" backends. The test coverage for the "apply"
backend now includes setting GIT_REFLOG_ACTION.
Note that rebasing the "conflicts" branch does not create any
conflicts yet. A commit to do that will be added in the next commit
and the diff ends up smaller if we have don't rename the branch when
it is added.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* pw/rebase-keep-base-fixes:
rebase --keep-base: imply --no-fork-point
rebase --keep-base: imply --reapply-cherry-picks
rebase: factor out branch_base calculation
rebase: rename merge_base to branch_base
rebase: store orig_head as a commit
rebase: be stricter when reading state files containing oids
t3416: set $EDITOR in subshell
t3416: tighten two tests
Given the name of the option it is confusing if --keep-base actually
changes the base of the branch without --fork-point being explicitly
given on the command line.
The combination of --keep-base with an explicit --fork-point is still
supported even though --fork-point means we do not keep the same base
if the upstream branch has been rewound. We do this in case anyone is
relying on this behavior which is tested in t3431[1]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200715032014.GA10818@generichostname/
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As --keep-base does not rebase the branch it is confusing if it
removes commits that have been cherry-picked to the upstream branch.
As --reapply-cherry-picks is not supported by the "apply" backend this
commit ensures that cherry-picks are reapplied by forcing the upstream
commit to match the onto commit unless --no-reapply-cherry-picks is
given.
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As $EDITOR is exported, setting it in one test affects all subsequent
tests. Avoid this by always setting it in a subshell. Also remove a
couple of unnecessary call to set_fake_editor where the editor does
not change the todo list.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a check for the correct error message to the tests that check we
require a single merge base so we can be sure the rebase failed for
the correct reason. Also rename the tests to reflect what they are
testing.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tests in this script use an unusual and hard to reason about
conditional construct
if expression; then false; else :; fi
Change them to use more idiomatic construct:
! expression
Cc: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nsengiyumva Wilberforce <nsengiyumvawilberforce@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When generating a multi-pack bitmap without a `--refs-snapshot` (e.g.,
by running `git multi-pack-index write --bitmap` directly), we determine
the set of bitmap-able commits by enumerating each reference, and adding
the referrent as the tip of a reachability traversal when it appears
somewhere in the MIDX. (Any commit we encounter during the reachability
traversal then becomes a candidate for bitmap selection).
But we incorrectly avoid peeling the object at the tip of each
reference. So if we see some reference that points at an annotated tag
(which in turn points through zero or more additional annotated tags at
a commit), that we will not add it as a tip for the reachability
traversal. This means that if some commit C is only referenced through
one or more annotated tag(s), then C won't become a bitmap candidate.
Correct this by peeling the reference tips as we enumerate them to
ensure that we consider commits which are the targets of annotated tags,
in addition to commits which are referenced directly.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Protected config is implemented by reading a fixed set of paths,
which ignores config [include]-s. Replace this implementation with a
call to config_with_options(), which handles [include]-s and saves us
from duplicating the logic of 1) identifying which paths to read and 2)
reading command line config.
As a result, git_configset_add_parameters() is unused, so remove it. It
was introduced alongside protected config in 5b3c650777 (config: learn
`git_protected_config()`, 2022-07-14) as a way to handle command line
config.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a test for the *.txt and *.c output assertions which asserts that
for "-h" lines that aren't the "usage: " or " or: " lines they start
with the same amount of whitespace. This ensures that we won't have
buggy output like:
[...]
or: git tag [-n[<num>]]
[...]
[--create-reflog] [...]
Which should instead be like this, i.e. the options lines should be
aligned:
[...]
or: git tag [-n[<num>]]
[...]
[--create-reflog] [...]
It would be better to be able to use "test_cmp" here, i.e. to
construct the output we expect, and compare it against the actual
output.
For most built-in commands this would be rather straightforward. In
"t0450-txt-doc-vs-help.sh" we already compute the whitespace that a
"git-$builtin" needs, and strip away "usage: " or " or: " from the
start of lines. The problem is:
* For commands that implement subcommands, such as "git bundle", we
don't know whether e.g. "git bundle create" is the subcommand
"create", or the argument "create" to "bundle" for the purposes of
alignment.
We *do* have that information from the *.txt version, since the
part within the ''-quotes should be the command & subcommand, but
that isn't consistent (e.g. see "git bundle" and "git
commit-graph", only the latter is correct), and parsing that out
would be non-trivial.
* If we were to make this stricter we have various
non-parse_options() users (e.g. "git diff-tree") that don't have the
nicely aligned output which we've had since
4631cfc20b (parse-options: properly align continued usage output,
2021-09-21).
So rather than make perfect the enemy of the good let's assert that
for those lines that are indented they should all use the same
indentation.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's been a lot of incremental effort to make the SYNOPSIS output
in our documentation consistent with the -h output,
e.g. cbe485298b (git reflog [expire|delete]: make -h output
consistent with SYNOPSIS, 2022-03-17) is one recent example, but that
effort has been an uphill battle due to the lack of regression
testing.
This adds such regression testing, we can parse out the SYNOPSIS
output with "sed", and it turns out it's relatively easy to normalize
it and the "-h" output to match on another.
We now ensure that we won't have regressions when it comes to the list
of commands in "expect_help_to_match_txt" below, and in subsequent
commits we'll make more of them consistent.
The naïve parser here gets quite a few things wrong, but it doesn't
need to be perfect, just good enough that we can compare /some/ of
this help output. There's no cases where the output would match except
for the parser's stupidity, it's all cases of e.g. comparing the *.txt
to non-parse_options() output.
Since that output is wildly different than the *.txt anyway let's
leave this for now, we can fix the parser some other time, or it won't
become necessary as we'll e.g. convert more things to using
parse_options().
Having a special-case for "merge-tree"'s 1f0c3a29da (merge-tree:
implement real merges, 2022-06-18) is a bit ugly, but preferred to
blessing that " (deprecated)" pattern for other commands. We'd
probably want to add some other way of marking deprecated commands in
the SYNOPSIS syntax. Syntactically 1f0c3a29da3's way of doing it is
indistinguishable from the command taking an optional literal
"deprecated" string as an argument.
Some of the issues that are left:
* "git show -h", "git whatchanged -h" and "git reflog --oneline -h"
all showing "git log" and "git show" usage output. I.e. the
"builtin_log_usage" in builtin/log.c doesn't take into account what
command we're running.
* Commands which implement subcommands such as like
"multi-pack-index", "notes", "remote" etc. having their subcommands
in a very different order in the *.txt and *.c. Fixing it would
require some verbose diffs, so it's been left alone for now.
* Commands such as "format-patch" have a very long argument list in
the *.txt, but just "[<options>]" in the *.c.
What to do about these has been left out of this series, except to
the extent that preceding commits changed "[<options>]" (or
equivalent) to the list of options in cases where that list of
options was tiny, or we clearly meant to exhaustively list the
options in both *.txt and *.c.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change "builtin/credential-cache--daemon.c" to use "<socket-path>" not
"<socket_path>" in a placeholder label, almost all of our
documentation uses this form.
This is now consistent with the "If a placeholder has multiple words,
they are separated by dashes" guideline added in
9c9b4f2f8b (standardize usage info string format, 2015-01-13), let's
add a now-passing test to assert that that's the case.
To do this we need to introduce a very sed-powered parser to extract
the SYNOPSIS from the *.txt, and handle not all commands with "-h"
having a corresponding *.txt (e.g. "bisect--helper"). We'll still want
to handle syntax edge cases in the *.txt in subsequent commits for
other checks, but let's do that then.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's arguably more correct to say "[<option>...]" than either of these
forms, but the vast majority of our documentation uses the
"[<options>]" form to indicate an arbitrary number of options, let's
do the same in these cases, which were the odd ones out.
In the case of "mv" and "sparse-checkout" let's add the missing "[]"
to indicate that these are optional.
In the case of "t/helper/test-proc-receive.c" there is no *.txt
version, making it the only hunk in this commit that's not a "doc txt
& -h consistency" change.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a test to assert basic compliance with the CodingGuidelines in the
SYNOPSIS and builtin -h output. For now we only assert that the "-h"
output doesn't have "\t" characters, as a very basic syntax check.
Subsequent commits will expand on the checks here as various issues
are fixed, but let's first add the test scaffolding.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As noted in fd3aaf53f7 (run-command: add an "ungroup" option to
run_process_parallel(), 2022-06-07) which added the "ungroup" passing
it to "run_process_parallel()" via the global
"run_processes_parallel_ungroup" variable was a compromise to get the
smallest possible regression fix for "maint" at the time.
This follow-up to that is a start at passing that parameter and others
via a new "struct run_process_parallel_opts", as the earlier
version[1] of what became fd3aaf53f7 did.
Since we need to change all of the occurrences of "n" to
"opt->SOMETHING" let's take the opportunity and rename the terse "n"
to "processes". We could also have picked "max_processes", "jobs",
"threads" etc., but as the API is named "run_processes_parallel()"
let's go with "processes".
Since the new "run_processes_parallel()" function is able to take an
optional "tr2_category" and "tr2_label" via the struct we can at this
point migrate all of the users of "run_processes_parallel_tr2()" over
to it.
But let's not migrate all the API users yet, only the two users that
passed the "ungroup" parameter via the
"run_processes_parallel_ungroup" global
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover-v2-0.8-00000000000-20220518T195858Z-avarab@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a "jobs = 0" is passed let's BUG() out rather than fall back on
online_cpus(). The default behavior was added when this API was
implemented in c553c72eed (run-command: add an asynchronous parallel
child processor, 2015-12-15).
Most of our code in-tree that scales up to "online_cpus()" by default
calls that function by itself. Keeping this default behavior just for
the sake of two callers means that we'd need to maintain this one spot
where we're second-guessing the config passed down into pp_init().
The preceding commit has an overview of the API callers that passed
"jobs = 0". There were only two of them (actually three, but they
resolved to these two config parsing codepaths).
The "fetch.parallel" caller already had a test for the
"fetch.parallel=0" case added in 0353c68818 (fetch: do not run a
redundant fetch from submodule, 2022-05-16), but there was no such
test for "submodule.fetchJobs". Let's add one here.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the "run-command" test helper to "return" instead of calling
"exit", see 338abb0f04 (builtins + test helpers: use return instead
of exit() in cmd_*, 2021-06-08)
Because we'd previously gotten past the SANITIZE=leak check by using
exit() here we need to move to "goto cleanup" pattern.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the "run_processes_parallel{,_tr2}()" functions to return void,
instead of int. Ever since c553c72eed (run-command: add an
asynchronous parallel child processor, 2015-12-15) they have
unconditionally returned 0.
To get a "real" return value out of this function the caller needs to
get it via the "task_finished_fn" callback, see the example in hook.c
added in 96e7225b31 (hook: add 'run' subcommand, 2021-12-22).
So the "result = " and "if (!result)" code added to "builtin/fetch.c"
d54dea77db (fetch: let --jobs=<n> parallelize --multiple, too,
2019-10-05) has always been redundant, we always took that "if"
path. Likewise the "ret =" in "t/helper/test-run-command.c" added in
be5d88e112 (test-tool run-command: learn to run (parts of) the
testsuite, 2019-10-04) wasn't used, instead we got the return value
from the "if (suite.failed.nr > 0)" block seen in the context.
Subsequent commits will alter this API interface, getting rid of this
always-zero return value makes it easier to understand those changes.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Adjust the cmd__run_command() to use an "if/else if" chain rather than
mutually exclusive "if" statements. This non-functional change makes a
subsequent commit smaller.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When downloading bundles from a git-remote-https subprocess, the bundle
URI logic wants to be opportunistic and download as much as possible and
work with what did succeed. This is particularly important in the "any"
mode, where any single bundle success will work.
If the URI is not available, the git-remote-https process will die()
with a "fatal:" error message, even though that error is not actually
fatal to the super process. Since stderr is passed through, it looks
like a fatal error to the user.
Suppress stderr to avoid these errors from bubbling to the surface. The
bundle URI API adds its own warning() messages on these failures.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When downloading a list of bundles in "all" mode, Git has no
understanding of the dependencies between the bundles. Git attempts to
unbundle the bundles in some order, but some may not pass the
verify_bundle() step because of missing prerequisites. This is passed as
error messages to the user, even when they eventually succeed in later
attempts after their dependent bundles are unbundled.
Add a new VERIFY_BUNDLE_QUIET flag to verify_bundle() that avoids the
error messages from the missing prerequisite commits. The method still
returns the number of missing prerequisit commits, allowing callers to
unbundle() to notice that the bundle failed to apply.
Use this flag in bundle-uri.c and test that the messages go away for
'git clone --bundle-uri' commands.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the content at a given bundle URI is not understood as a bundle
(based on inspecting the initial content), then Git currently gives up
and ignores that content. Independent bundle providers may want to split
up the bundle content into multiple bundles, but still make them
available from a single URI.
Teach Git to attempt parsing the bundle URI content as a Git config file
providing the key=value pairs for a bundle list. Git then looks at the
mode of the list to see if ANY single bundle is sufficient or if ALL
bundles are required. The content at the selected URIs are downloaded
and the content is inspected again, creating a recursive process.
To guard the recursion against malformed or malicious content, limit the
recursion depth to a reasonable four for now. This can be converted to a
configured value in the future if necessary. The value of four is twice
as high as expected to be useful (a bundle list is unlikely to point to
more bundle lists).
To test this scenario, create an interesting bundle topology where three
incremental bundles are built on top of a single full bundle. By using a
merge commit, the two middle bundles are "independent" in that they do
not require each other in order to unbundle themselves. They each only
need the base bundle. The bundle containing the merge commit requires
both of the middle bundles, though. This leads to some interesting
decisions when unbundling, especially when we later implement heuristics
that promote downloading bundles until the prerequisite commits are
satisfied.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a bundle provider wants to operate independently from a Git remote,
they want to provide a single, consistent URI that users can use in
their 'git clone --bundle-uri' commands. At this point, the Git client
expects that URI to be a single bundle that can be unbundled and used to
bootstrap the rest of the clone from the Git server. This single bundle
cannot be re-used to assist with future incremental fetches.
To allow for the incremental fetch case, teach Git to understand a
bundle list that could be advertised at an independent bundle URI. Such
a bundle list is likely to be inspected by human readers, even if only
by the bundle provider creating the list. For this reason, we can take
our expected "key=value" pairs and instead format them using Git config
format.
Create bundle_uri_parse_config_format() to parse a file in config format
and convert that into a 'struct bundle_list' filled with its
understanding of the contents.
Be careful to use error_action CONFIG_ERROR_ERROR when calling
git_config_from_file_with_options() because the default action for
git_config_from_file() is to die() on a parsing error. The current
warning isn't particularly helpful if it arises to a user, but it will
be made more verbose at a higher layer later.
Update 'test-tool bundle-uri' to take this config file format as input.
It uses a filename instead of stdin because there is no existing way to
parse a FILE pointer in the config machinery. Using
git_config_from_mem() is overly complicated and more likely to introduce
bugs than this simpler version.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Create a new 'test-tool bundle-uri' test helper. This helper will assist
in testing logic deep in the bundle URI feature.
This change introduces the 'parse-key-values' subcommand, which parses
an input file as a list of lines. These are fed into
bundle_uri_parse_line() to test how we construct a 'struct bundle_list'
from that data. The list is then output to stdout as if the key-value
pairs were a Git config file.
We use an input file instead of stdin because of a future change to
parse in config-file format that works better as an input file.
Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a logic in "mailinfo -b" that miscomputed the length of a
substring, which lead to an out-of-bounds access.
* pw/mailinfo-b-fix:
mailinfo -b: fix an out of bounds access
Force C locale while running tests around httpd to make sure we can
find expected error messages in the log.
* rs/test-httpd-in-C-locale:
t/lib-httpd: pass LANG and LC_ALL to Apache
Since 79d3696cfb (git-grep: boolean expression on pattern matching.,
2006-06-30) the "pattern_expression" member has been used for complex
queries (AND/OR...), with "pattern_list" being used for the simple OR
queries. Since then we've used both "pattern_expression" and its
associated boolean "extended" member to see if we have a complex
expression.
Since f41fb662f5 (revisions API: have release_revisions() release
"grep_filter", 2022-04-13) we've had a subtle bug relating to that: If
we supplied options that were only used for "complex queries", but
didn't supply the query itself we'd set "opt->extended", but would
have a NULL "pattern_expression". As a result these would segfault as
we tried to call "free_grep_patterns()" from "release_revisions()":
git -P log -1 --invert-grep
git -P log -1 --all-match
The root cause of this is that we were conflating the state management
we needed in "compile_grep_patterns()" itself with whether or not we
had an "opt->pattern_expression" later on.
In this cases as we're going through "compile_grep_patterns()" we have
no "opt->pattern_list" but have "opt->no_body_match" or
"opt->all_match". So we'd set "opt->extended = 1", but not "return" on
"opt->extended" as that's an "else if" in the same "if" statement.
That behavior is intentional and required, as the common case is that
we have an "opt->pattern_list" that we're about to parse into the
"opt->pattern_expression".
But we don't need to keep track of this "extended" flag beyond the
state management in compile_grep_patterns() itself. It needs it, but
once we're out of that function we can rely on
"opt->pattern_expression" being non-NULL instead for using these
extended patterns.
As 79d3696cfb itself shows we've assumed that there's a one-to-one
mapping between the two since the very beginning. I.e. "match_line()"
would check "opt->extended" to see if it should call "match_expr()",
and the first thing we do in that function is assume that we have a
"opt->pattern_expression". We'd then call "match_expr_eval()", which
would have died if that "opt->pattern_expression" was NULL.
The "die" was added in c922b01f54 (grep: fix segfault when "git grep
'('" is given, 2009-04-27), and can now be removed as it's now clearly
unreachable. We still do the right thing in the case that prompted
that fix:
git grep '('
fatal: unmatched parenthesis
Arguably neither the "--invert-grep" option added in [1] nor the
earlier "--all-match" option added in [2] were intended to be used
stand-alone, and another approach[3] would be to error out in those
cases. But since we've been treating them as a NOOP when given without
--grep for a long time let's keep doing that.
We could also return in "free_pattern_expr()" if the argument is
non-NULL, as an alternative fix for this segfault does [4]. That would
be more elegant in making the "free_*()" function behave like
"free()", but it would also remove a sanity check: The
"free_pattern_expr()" function calls itself recursively, and only the
top-level is allowed to be NULL, let's not conflate those two
conditions.
1. 22dfa8a23d (log: teach --invert-grep option, 2015-01-12)
2. 0ab7befa31 (grep --all-match, 2006-09-27)
3. https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-1.1-f4b90799fce-20221010T165711Z-avarab@gmail.com/
4. http://lore.kernel.org/git/7e094882c2a71894416089f894557a9eae07e8f8.1665423686.git.me@ttaylorr.com
Reported-by: orygaw <orygaw@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
