From user feedback:
- One user is confused about why `git reset --merge`
(why not just `git reset`?). Handle this by mentioning
`git merge --abort` and `git reset --abort` instead, which have a
more obvious meaning.
- 2 users want to know what "In older versions of Git" means exactly
(in versions older than 1.7.0). Handle this by removing the warning
since it was added 15 years ago (in 3f8fc184c0)
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
From user feedback: this example is confusing because it implies that
`git pull` will run `git merge` by default, but the default is
`--ff-only`.
We could instead show an example of a fast-forward merge, but that may
not add a lot since fast-forward merges are relatively simple. This lets
us keep the description short.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
From user feedback:
- One user is confused about the current default ("I was convinced that
the git default was still to merge on pull")
- One user is confused about why "git fetch" isn't mentioned earlier
- One user says they always forget what the arguments to `git pull` are
and that it's not immediately obvious that `--no-rebase` means "merge"
- One user wants `--ff-only` to be mentioned
Resolve this by listing the options for integrating the the remote
branch. This should help users figure out at a glance which one they
want to do, and make it clearer that --ff-only is the default.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
From user feedback:
- it's confusing that we use both <branch> and <refspec> to refer to the
second argument
- one user is not clear about what `refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*`
is meant to be an example of ("is it like a path?")
The DESCRIPTION section is also doing a lot right now: it's trying to
describe both how the <repository> and <refspec> arguments work (which
is pretty complex, as seen in the DEFAULT BEHAVIOUR section)
as well as how `git pull` calls `git fetch` and merge/rebase/etc
depending on the arguments.
Handle this by moving the description of the <repository> and <refspec>
arguments to the OPTIONS section, so that we can focus on the
merge/rebase/etc behaviour in the DESCRIPTION section, and refer folks
to the later sections for details.
Use the term "upstream" instead of 'the "remote" and "merge"
configuration for the current branch' since users are more likely to
know what an "upstream" is.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git refs exists" that works like "git show-ref --exists" has been
added.
* ms/refs-exists:
t: add test for git refs exists subcommand
t1422: refactor tests to be shareable
t1403: split 'show-ref --exists' tests into a separate file
builtin/refs: add 'exists' subcommand
Documentation for "git add" has been updated.
* je/doc-add:
doc: rephrase the purpose of the staging area
doc: git-add: simplify discussion of ignored files
doc: git-add: clarify intro & add an example
A new command "git last-modified" has been added to show the closest
ancestor commit that touched each path.
* tc/last-modified:
last-modified: use Bloom filters when available
t/perf: add last-modified perf script
last-modified: new subcommand to show when files were last modified
As part of the ongoing effort to consolidate reference handling,
introduce a new `exists` subcommand. This command provides the same
functionality and exit-code behavior as `git show-ref --exists`, serving
as its modern replacement.
The logic for `show-ref --exists` is minimal. Rather than creating a
shared helper function which would be overkill for ~20 lines of code,
its implementation is intentionally duplicated here. This contrasts with
`git refs list`, where sharing the larger implementation of
`for-each-ref` was necessary.
Documentation for the new subcommand is also added to the `git-refs(1)`
man page.
Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Mentored-by: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Meet Soni <meetsoni3017@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a missed backtick to the end of a code segment so that it will be
rendered like preceding examples.
I deeply appreciate the thoroughness of this documentation. I noticed
the formatting discrepancy reading https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config.
Signed-off-by: Kyle E. Mitchell <kyle@kemitchell.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Noël AVILA <avila.jn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update the instruction to use of GGG in the MyFirstContribution
document to say that a GitHub PR could be made against `git/git`
instead of `gitgitgadget/git`.
* ds/doc-ggg-pr-fork-clarify:
doc: clarify which remotes can be used with GitGitGadget
Fix missing single-quote pairs in a documentation page.
* kh/doc-interpret-trailers-markup-fix:
doc: interpret-trailers: close all pairs of single quotes
Git does not really "store the contents of the next commit"
anywhere; rather, you the user use the index to prepare it.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
[jc; made the change relative to what is already in 'next']
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Discord has been added to the first contribution documentation as
another way to ask for help.
* ds/doc-community-discord:
doc: add discord to ways of getting help
Similar to git-blame(1), introduce a new subcommand
git-last-modified(1). This command shows the most recent modification to
paths in a tree. It does so by expanding the tree at a given commit,
taking note of the current state of each path, and then walking
backwards through history looking for commits where each path changed
into its final commit ID.
Based-on-patch-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Improved-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The compatObjectFormat extension is used to hide an incomplete
feature that is not yet usable for any purpose other than
developing the feature further. Document it as such to discourage
its use by mere mortals.
* bc/doc-compat-object-format-not-working:
docs: note that extensions.compatobjectformat is incomplete
The start_delayed_progress() function in the progress eye-candy API
did not clear its internal state, making an initial delay value
larger than 1 second ineffective, which has been corrected.
* js/progress-delay-fix:
progress: pay attention to (customized) delay time
Documentation for "git rebase" has been updated.
* je/doc-rebase:
doc: git-rebase: update discussion of internals
doc: git-rebase: move --onto explanation down
doc: git rebase: clarify arguments syntax
doc: git rebase: dedup merge conflict discussion
doc: git-rebase: start with an example
The compatibility object format is only implemented for loose objects,
not packed objects, so anyone attempting to push or fetch data into a
repository with this option will likely not see it work as expected. In
addition, the underlying storage of loose object mapping is likely to
change because the current format is inefficient and does not handle
important mapping information such as that of submodules.
It would have been preferable to initially document that this was not
yet ready for prime time, but we did not do so. We hinted at the fact
that this functionality is incomplete in the description, but did not
say so explicitly. Let's do so now: indicate that this feature is
incomplete and subject to change and that the option is not designed to
be used by end users.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using one of the start_delayed_*() functions, clients of the progress
API can request that a progress meter is only shown after some time.
To do that, the implementation intends to count down the number of
seconds stored in struct progress by observing flag progress_update,
which the timer interrupt handler sets when a second has elapsed. This
works during the first second of the delay. But the code forgets to
reset the flag to zero, so that subsequent calls of display_progress()
think that another second has elapsed and decrease the count again
until zero is reached. Due to the frequency of the calls, this happens
without an observable delay in practice, so that the effective delay is
always just one second.
This bug has been with us since the inception of the feature. Despite
having been touched on various occasions, such as 8aade107dd
(progress: simplify "delayed" progress API), 9c5951cacf (progress:
drop delay-threshold code), and 44a4693bfc (progress: create
GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY), the short delay went unnoticed.
Copy the flag state into a local variable and reset the global flag
right away so that we can detect the next clock tick correctly.
Since we have not had any complaints that the delay of one second is
too short nor that GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY is ignored, people seem to be
comfortable with the status quo. Therefore, set the default to 1 to
keep the current behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A new subcommand "git repo" gives users a way to grab various
repository characteristics.
* lo/repo-info:
repo: add the --format flag
repo: add the field layout.shallow
repo: add the field layout.bare
repo: add the field references.format
repo: declare the repo command
Doc lint updates to encourage the newer and easier-to-use
`synopsis` format, with fixes to a handful of existing uses.
* ja/doc-lint-sections-and-synopsis:
doc lint: check that synopsis manpages have synopsis inlines
doc:git-for-each-ref: fix styling and typos
doc: check for absence of the form --[no-]parameter
doc: check for absence of multiple terms in each entry of desc list
doc: check well-formedness of delimited sections
doc: test linkgit macros for well-formedness
Revert back to “Git's” which was used before d30c5cc459 (doc: convert
git-mergetool options to new synopsis style, 2025-05-25) accidentally
changed it.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are three tips how to compose a non-line-wrapped patch with
Thunderbird. The first one suggests use of an add-on. The one
referenced has long been superseded by a different one. Update the
link to the new one. Mention that additional configuration is
required to make the add-on work.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The docs mostly point to using git/git as one's remote, however, when it
comes to Sending a PR to GitGitGadget section, the reader is told to use
gitgitgadget/git, with no mention of git/git, potentially leading to
some confusion.
Clarify that both gitgitgadget/git and git/git can be used, albeit with
some differences.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Sassoli <danielesassoli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- make it clearer that we're talking about a multistep process
- give a more technically accurate description how rebase works with the
merge backend.
- condense the explanation of how git rebase skips commits with the same
textual changes into a single bullet point and remove the explanatory
diagram. Lots of things which are more complicated are already being
explained without a diagram.
- remove the explanation of how exactly `--fork-point` and `--root`
work since that information is in the OPTIONS section
- put all discussion of `ORIG_HEAD` inside the note
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's a very clear explanation with examples of using --onto which is
currently buried in the very long DESCRIPTION section. This moves it to
its own section, so that we can reference the explanation from the
`--onto` option by name.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove duplicate explanation of `git rebase <upstream> <branch>` which
is already explained above.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously there were two explanations, this combines them both into a
single explanation.
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Start with an example that mirrors the example in the `git-merge` man
page, to make it easier for folks to understand the difference between
a rebase and a merge.
- Mention that rebase can combine or reorder commits
Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "list" subcommand of "git refs" acts as a front-end for
"git for-each-ref".
* ms/refs-list:
t: add test for git refs list subcommand
t6300: refactor tests to be shareable
builtin/refs: add list subcommand
builtin/for-each-ref: factor out core logic into a helper
builtin/for-each-ref: align usage string with the man page
doc: factor out common option
