checkout: fix memory leak

This change addresses part of the NEEDSWORK comment above the code,
therefore the comment needs to be adjusted, too.

Discovered via Coverity.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This commit is contained in:
Johannes Schindelin
2017-04-18 14:02:51 +02:00
parent 05e85c184b
commit 00dec0d28d

View File

@@ -235,22 +235,24 @@ static int checkout_merged(int pos, const struct checkout *state)
/*
* NEEDSWORK:
* There is absolutely no reason to write this as a blob object
* and create a phony cache entry just to leak. This hack is
* primarily to get to the write_entry() machinery that massages
* the contents to work-tree format and writes out which only
* allows it for a cache entry. The code in write_entry() needs
* to be refactored to allow us to feed a <buffer, size, mode>
* instead of a cache entry. Such a refactoring would help
* merge_recursive as well (it also writes the merge result to the
* object database even when it may contain conflicts).
* and create a phony cache entry. This hack is primarily to get
* to the write_entry() machinery that massages the contents to
* work-tree format and writes out which only allows it for a
* cache entry. The code in write_entry() needs to be refactored
* to allow us to feed a <buffer, size, mode> instead of a cache
* entry. Such a refactoring would help merge_recursive as well
* (it also writes the merge result to the object database even
* when it may contain conflicts).
*/
if (write_sha1_file(result_buf.ptr, result_buf.size,
blob_type, oid.hash))
die(_("Unable to add merge result for '%s'"), path);
free(result_buf.ptr);
ce = make_cache_entry(mode, oid.hash, path, 2, 0);
if (!ce)
die(_("make_cache_entry failed for path '%s'"), path);
status = checkout_entry(ce, state, NULL);
free(ce);
return status;
}