What's cooking (2022/04 #04)

This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano
2022-04-14 14:55:43 -07:00
parent a081b42c76
commit e659541d82

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Bcc: lwn@lwn.net
Subject: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2022, #03; Tue, 12)
X-master-at: 11cfe552610386954886543f5de87dcc49ad5735
X-next-at: 64f902a358a9e80c900e2fb98bca7fe335154015
Subject: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2022, #04; Thu, 14)
X-master-at: 4027e30c5395c9c1aeea85e99f51ac62f5148145
X-next-at: 8af0fa9b8e9e4d9f3a9661b1fd1f8c8822364ea5
What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2022, #03; Tue, 12)
What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2022, #04; Thu, 14)
--------------------------------------------------
Here are the topics that have been cooking in my tree. Commits
@@ -18,12 +18,6 @@ useful"). Do not read too much into a topic being in (or not in)
'seen'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the
integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
Security releases for the 2.30-2.35 maintenance tracks have been
tagged to address CVE-2022-24765, where multi-user machines with a
shared "mob" directory a user can trick other users into running a
command of their choice easily. The fix has been merged up to Git
2.36-rc2 and also all integration branches above.
Copies of the source code to Git live in many repositories, and the
following is a list of the ones I push into or their mirrors. Some
repositories have only a subset of branches.
@@ -55,33 +49,39 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
--------------------------------------------------
[Graduated to 'master']
* ja/i18n-fix-for-2.36 (2022-04-11) 1 commit
(merged to 'next' on 2022-04-11 at 0953a117dc)
+ i18n: fix some badly formatted i18n strings
* jc/relnotes-updates (2022-04-13) 2 commits
(merged to 'next' on 2022-04-14 at a19d9a5cc2)
+ RelNotes: mention safe.directory
+ RelNotes: clarify "bisect run unexecutable" tweak
Fixes to some localizable strings.
source: <pull.1212.git.1649705011178.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Wording updates for 2.36 release notes.
* jc/revert-ref-transaction-hook-changes (2022-04-13) 3 commits
(merged to 'next' on 2022-04-14 at 94ac0baec8)
+ RelNotes: revert the description on the reverted topics
+ Revert "fetch: increase test coverage of fetches"
+ Revert "Merge branch 'ps/avoid-unnecessary-hook-invocation-with-packed-refs'"
Revert the "deletion of a ref should not trigger transaction events
for loose and packed ref backends separately" that regresses the
behaviour when a ref is not modified since it was packed.
--------------------------------------------------
[New Topics]
* pw/test-malloc-with-sanitize-address (2022-04-11) 1 commit
- tests: make SANITIZE=address imply TEST_NO_MALLOC_CHECK
* sa/t1011-use-helpers (2022-04-12) 1 commit
- t1011: replace test -f with test_path_is_file
Avoid problems from interaction between malloc_check and address
sanitizer.
A GSoC practice.
Will merge to 'next'.
source: <pull.1210.git.1649507317350.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
source: <20220412203722.10484-1-siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
* rs/t7812-pcre2-ws-bug-test (2022-04-11) 1 commit
- t7812: test PCRE2 whitespace bug
* ep/coverage-report-wants-test-to-have-run (2022-04-13) 1 commit
- Makefile: add a prerequisite to the coverage-report target
A test to ensure workaround for an earlier pcre2 bug does work.
Will merge to 'next'.
source: <3a49649d-8ff9-e5a7-e3fd-33fee5068ae8@web.de>
source: <20220414022513.31465-1-gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------
[Stalled]
@@ -138,6 +138,25 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
--------------------------------------------------
[Cooking]
* pw/test-malloc-with-sanitize-address (2022-04-11) 1 commit
- tests: make SANITIZE=address imply TEST_NO_MALLOC_CHECK
Avoid problems from interaction between malloc_check and address
sanitizer.
Will merge to 'next'.
source: <pull.1210.git.1649507317350.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
* rs/t7812-pcre2-ws-bug-test (2022-04-11) 1 commit
- t7812: test PCRE2 whitespace bug
A test to ensure workaround for an earlier pcre2 bug does work.
Will merge to 'next'.
source: <3a49649d-8ff9-e5a7-e3fd-33fee5068ae8@web.de>
* ah/convert-warning-message (2022-04-08) 1 commit
- convert: clarify line ending conversion warning
@@ -259,7 +278,7 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
source: <20220406181320.16911-1-eantoranz@gmail.com>
* ab/plug-leak-in-revisions (2022-04-03) 28 commits
* ab/plug-leak-in-revisions (2022-04-13) 28 commits
- revisions API: add a TODO for diff_free(&revs->diffopt)
- revisions API: have release_revisions() release "topo_walk_info"
- revisions API: have release_revisions() release "date_mode"
@@ -292,11 +311,11 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
Plug the memory leaks from the trickiest API of all, the revision
walker.
Will merge to 'next'?
source: <cover-v5-00.27-00000000000-20220402T102002Z-avarab@gmail.com>
Will merge to 'next'.
source: <cover-v6-00.27-00000000000-20220413T195935Z-avarab@gmail.com>
* ab/ci-github-workflow-markup (2022-03-27) 7 commits
* ab/ci-github-workflow-markup (2022-04-14) 7 commits
- ci: call `finalize_test_case_output` a little later
- ci: use `--github-workflow-markup` in the GitHub workflow
- ci: optionally mark up output in the GitHub workflow
@@ -309,13 +328,15 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
Build a moral equivalent of js/ci-github-workflow-markup on top of
ab/ci-setup-simplify.
How does this compare feature-wise with js/ci-github-workflow-markup?
source: <RFC-cover-v3-0.6-00000000000-20220325T183946Z-avarab@gmail.com>
How well does this compare feature-wise with js/ci-github-workflow-markup?
source: <RFC-cover-v4-0.6-00000000000-20220413T195514Z-avarab@gmail.com>
* ab/ci-setup-simplify (2022-03-27) 25 commits
* ab/ci-setup-simplify (2022-04-14) 29 commits
- CI: make it easy to use ci/*.sh outside of CI
- CI: don't use "set -x" in "ci/lib.sh" output
- CI: set PYTHON_PATH setting for osx-{clang,gcc} into "$jobname" case
- CI: set SANITIZE=leak in MAKEFLAGS directly
- CI: set CC in MAKEFLAGS directly, don't add it to the environment
- CI: add more variables to MAKEFLAGS, except under vs-build
- CI: narrow down variable definitions in --build and --test
@@ -327,6 +348,7 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
- CI: split up and reduce "ci/test-documentation.sh"
- CI: invoke "make artifacts-tar" directly in windows-build
- CI: check ignored unignored build artifacts in "win[+VS] build" too
- ci/lib.sh: use "test" instead of "["
- CI: remove "run-build-and-tests.sh", run "make [test]" directly
- CI: export variables via a wrapper
- CI: consistently use "export" in ci/lib.sh
@@ -334,6 +356,7 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
- CI: have "static-analysis" run "check-builtins", not "documentation"
- CI: have "static-analysis" run a "make ci-static-analysis" target
- CI: don't have "git grep" invoke a pager in tree content check
- CI/lib.sh: stop adding leading whitespace to $MAKEFLAGS
- CI: remove unused Azure ci/* code
- CI: remove dead "tree skipping" code
- CI: remove more dead Travis CI support
@@ -344,11 +367,8 @@ Release tarballs are available at:
Drive more actions done in CI via the Makefile instead of shell
commands sprinkled in .github/workflows/main.yml
Unless "doing more in Makefile" is fundamentally undesirable, I am
inclined to take this, together with ab/ci-github-workflow-markup
to replace js/ci-github-workflow-markup
cf. <xmqq4k361a57.fsf@gitster.g>
source: <cover-v2-00.25-00000000000-20220325T182534Z-avarab@gmail.com>
Will merge to 'next'?
source: <cover-v3-00.29-00000000000-20220413T194847Z-avarab@gmail.com>
* kf/p4-multiple-remotes (2022-03-21) 1 commit