* master:
tests: use test_cmp instead of piping to diff(1)
t7004-tag.sh: re-arrange git tag comment for clarity
rebase -X: do not clobber strategy
Documentation: document show -s
dir.c: fix EXC_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR match in sparse checkout
In case HEAD does not point to a valid commit yet, merge is
implemented as a hard reset. This will cause untracked files to be
overwritten.
Instead, assume the empty tree for HEAD and do a regular merge. An
untracked file will cause the merge to abort and do nothing. If no
conflicting files are present, the merge will have the same effect
as a hard reset.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change submodule tests that piped to diff(1) to use test_cmp. The
resulting unified diff is easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Split the "message in editor has initial comment" test into three
tests. The motivation is to be able to only skip the middle part under
NO_GETTEXT_POISON.
In addition the return value of 'git tag' was being returned. We now
check that it's non-zero. I used ! instead of test_must_fail so that
the GIT_EDITOR variable was only used in this command invocation, and
because the surrounding tests use this style.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When an initial --in-reply-to is supplied, make it apply only to the
first message; --[no-]chain-reply-to setting are honored by second and
subsequent messages; this is also how the git-format-patch option with
the same name behaves.
Moreover, when $initial_reply_to is asked to the user interactively it
is asked as the "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the _first_
email", this makes the user think that the second and subsequent
patches are not using it but are considered as replies to the first
message or chained according to the --[no-]chain-reply setting.
Look at the v2 series in the illustration to see what the new behavior
ensures:
(before the patch) | (after the patch)
[PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... | [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did...
[PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests | [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests
[PATCH 2/2] Implementation | [PATCH 2/2] Implementation
[PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll | [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll
[PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up | [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up
[PATCH v2 2/3] New tests | [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests
[PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation | [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation
This is the typical behaviour we want when we send a series with cover
letter in reply to some discussion, the new patch series should appear
as a separate subtree in the discussion.
Also update the documentation on --in-reply-to to describe the new
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If any strategy options are passed to -X, the strategy will always be
set to 'recursive'. According to the documentation, it should default to
'recursive' if it is not set, but it should be possible to set it to
other values.
This fixes a regression introduced in v1.7.3-rc0~67^2 (2010-07-29).
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous text was not exactly accurate; it is OK to
change space and minus lines, but only in certain ways.
This patch takes a whole new approach, which is to describe
the sorts of conceptual operations you might want to
perform. It also includes a healthy dose of warnings about
how things can go wrong.
Since the size of the text is getting quite long, it also
splits this out into an "editing patches" section. This
makes more sense with the current structure, anyway, which
already splits out the interactive mode description.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git's diff machinery has supported a -s (silence diff output) option
as far back as v0.99~900 (Silent flag for show-diff, 2005-04-13), but
the option is only advertised in an odd corner of the git diff-tree
manual.
The main use is to retrieve basic metadata about a commit:
git show -s rev
Explain this in the 'git log' manual and provide an example in the
'git show' examples section. This is kind of a cop-out, since it
would be more useful to explain it in the 'git show' manual proper,
which says:
The command takes options applicable to the git
diff-tree command to control how the changes the
commit introduces are shown.
This manual page describes only the most frequently
used options.
Fixing that is a larger task for another day.
Reported-by: Will Hall <will@gnatter.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit c84de70 (excluded_1(): support exclude files in index -
2009-08-20) tries to work around the fact that there is no
directory/file information in index entries, therefore
EXC_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR match would fail.
Unfortunately the workaround is flawed. This fixes it.
Reported-by: Thomas Rinderknecht <thomasr@sailguy.org>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1. When --in-reply-to gives $reply_to, the first one becomes a reply to
that message, with or without --chain-reply-to.
2. When --chain-reply-to is in effect, all the messages are strung
together to form a single chain. The first message may be in reply to
the $reply_to given by --in-reply-to command line option (see
previous), or the root of the discussion thread. The second one is a
response to the first one, and the third one is a response to the
second one, etc.
3. When --chain-reply-to is not in effect:
a. When --in-reply-to is used, too, the second and the subsequent ones
become replies to $reply_to. Together with the first rule, all
messages become replies to $reply_to given by --in-reply-to.
b. When --in-reply-to is not used, presumably the second and
subsequent ones become replies to the first one, which would be the
root.
The documentation is reasonably clear about the 1., 2. and 3a. above, I
think, even though I do not think 3b. is clearly specified.
The two tests added by this patch at least documents what happens between
these two options.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jn/gitweb-test:
gitweb/Makefile: Include gitweb/config.mak
gitweb/Makefile: Add 'test' and 'test-installed' targets
t/gitweb-lib.sh: Add support for GITWEB_TEST_INSTALLED
gitweb: Move call to evaluate_git_version after evaluate_gitweb_config
* en/merge-recursive: (40 commits)
merge-recursive:make_room_for_directories - work around dumb compilers
merge-recursive: Remove redundant path clearing for D/F conflicts
merge-recursive: Make room for directories in D/F conflicts
handle_delete_modify(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present
merge_content(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present
conflict_rename_rename_1to2(): Fix checks for presence of D/F conflicts
conflict_rename_delete(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present
merge-recursive: Delay modify/delete conflicts if D/F conflict present
merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames
merge-recursive: Delay handling of rename/delete conflicts
merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to other file
merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to two
merge-recursive: Avoid doubly merging rename/add conflict contents
merge-recursive: Update merge_content() call signature
merge-recursive: Update conflict_rename_rename_1to2() call signature
merge-recursive: Structure process_df_entry() to handle more cases
merge-recursive: Have process_entry() skip D/F or rename entries
merge-recursive: New function to assist resolving renames in-core only
merge-recursive: New data structures for deferring of D/F conflicts
merge-recursive: Move process_entry's content merging into a function
...
* cb/leading-path-removal:
do not overwrite files in leading path
lstat_cache: optionally return match_len
add function check_ok_to_remove()
t7607: add leading-path tests
t7607: use test-lib functions and check MERGE_HEAD
* jk/push-progress:
push: pass --progress down to git-pack-objects
t5523-push-upstream: test progress messages
t5523-push-upstream: add function to ensure fresh upstream repo
test_terminal: ensure redirections work reliably
test_terminal: catch use without TTY prerequisite
test-lib: allow test code to check the list of declared prerequisites
tests: test terminal output to both stdout and stderr
tests: factor out terminal handling from t7006
* sg/completion:
bash: support pretty format aliases
bash: support more 'git notes' subcommands and their options
bash: not all 'git bisect' subcommands make sense when not bisecting
bash: offer refs for 'git bisect start'
* sg/bisect:
bisect: check for mandatory argument of 'bisect replay'
bisect: improve error msg of 'bisect reset' when original HEAD is deleted
bisect: improve error message of 'bisect log' while not bisecting
* jm/mailmap:
t4203: do not let "git shortlog" DWIM based on tty
t4203 (mailmap): stop hardcoding commit ids and dates
mailmap: fix use of freed memory
* kb/maint-submodule-savearg:
submodule: only preserve flags across recursive status/update invocations
submodule: preserve all arguments exactly when recursing
* master:
t0003: properly quote $HOME
contrib/ciabot: git-describe commit instead of HEAD
Fix a formatting error in git-merge.txt
git-gui: apply color information from git diff output
git-gui: use wordprocessor tab style to ensure tabs work as expected
git-gui: correct assignment of work-tree
git-gui: use full dialog width for old name when renaming branch
git-gui: generic version trimming
git-gui: enable the Tk console when tracing/debugging on Windows
git-gui: show command-line errors in a messagebox on Windows
On Windows, avoid git-gui to call Cygwin's nice utility
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: apply color information from git diff output
git-gui: use wordprocessor tab style to ensure tabs work as expected
git-gui: correct assignment of work-tree
git-gui: use full dialog width for old name when renaming branch
git-gui: generic version trimming
git-gui: enable the Tk console when tracing/debugging on Windows
git-gui: show command-line errors in a messagebox on Windows
On Windows, avoid git-gui to call Cygwin's nice utility
"Fetch all tags and merge them" does not make any sense as a request at
the logical level, even though it might be more convenient to type.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Recursive invocations of submodule update/status preserve all arguments,
so executing
git submodule update --recursive -- foo
attempts to recursively update a submodule named "foo".
Naturally, this fails as one cannot have an infinitely-deep stack of
submodules each containing a submodule named "foo". The desired behavior
is instead to update foo and then recursively update all submodules
inside of foo.
This commit accomplishes that by only saving the flags for use in the
recursive invocation.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Shell variables only hold strings, not lists of parameters,
so $orig_args after
orig_args="$@"
fails to remember where each parameter starts and ends, if
some include whitespace. So
git submodule update \
--reference='/var/lib/common objects.git' \
--recursive --init
becomes
git submodule update --reference=/var/lib/common \
objects.git --recursive --init
in the inner repositories. Use "git rev-parse --sq-quote" to
save parameters in quoted form ready for evaluation by the
shell, avoiding this problem.
Helped-By: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
