The chainlint test script linter in the test suite has been updated.
* es/chainlint:
chainlint.sed: stop splitting "(..." into separate lines "(" and "..."
chainlint.sed: swallow comments consistently
chainlint.sed: stop throwing away here-doc tags
chainlint.sed: don't mistake `<< word` in string as here-doc operator
chainlint.sed: make here-doc "<<-" operator recognition more POSIX-like
chainlint.sed: drop subshell-closing ">" annotation
chainlint.sed: drop unnecessary distinction between ?!AMP?! and ?!SEMI?!
chainlint.sed: tolerate harmless ";" at end of last line in block
chainlint.sed: improve ?!SEMI?! placement accuracy
chainlint.sed: improve ?!AMP?! placement accuracy
t/Makefile: optimize chainlint self-test
t/chainlint/one-liner: avoid overly intimate chainlint.sed knowledge
t/chainlint/*.test: generalize self-test commentary
t/chainlint/*.test: fix invalid test cases due to mixing quote types
t/chainlint/*.test: don't use invalid shell syntax
"git apply" has been taught to ignore a message without a patch
with the "--allow-empty" option. It also learned to honor the
"--quiet" option given from the command line.
* jz/apply-quiet-and-allow-empty:
git-apply: add --allow-empty flag
git-apply: add --quiet flag
"git fetch --set-upstream" did not check if there is a current
branch, leading to a segfault when it is run on a detached HEAD,
which has been corrected.
* ab/fetch-set-upstream-while-detached:
pull, fetch: fix segfault in --set-upstream option
Some users or scripts will pipe "git diff"
output to "git apply" when replaying diffs
or commits. In these cases, they will rely
on the return value of "git apply" to know
whether the diff was applied successfully.
However, for empty commits, "git apply" will
fail. This complicates scripts since they
have to either buffer the diff and check
its length, or run diff again with "exit-code",
essentially doing the diff twice.
Add the "--allow-empty" flag to "git apply"
which allows it to handle both empty diffs
and empty commits created by "git format-patch
--always" by doing nothing and returning 0.
Add tests for both with and without --allow-empty.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace OPT_VERBOSE with OPT_VERBOSITY.
This adds a --quiet flag to "git apply" so
the user can turn down the verbosity.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because `sed` is line-oriented, for ease of implementation, when
chainlint.sed encounters an opening subshell in which the first command
is cuddled with the "(", it splits the line into two lines: one
containing only "(", and the other containing whatever follows "(".
This allows chainlint.sed to get by with a single set of regular
expressions for matching shell statements rather than having to
duplicate each expression (one set for matching non-cuddled statements,
and one set for matching cuddled statements).
However, although syntactically and semantically immaterial, this
transformation has no value to test authors and might even confuse them
into thinking that the linter is misbehaving by inserting (whitespace)
line-noise into the shell code it is validating. Moreover, it also
allows an implementation detail of chainlint.sed to seep into the
chainlint self-test "expect" files, which potentially makes it difficult
to reuse the self-tests should a more capable chainlint ever be
developed.
To address these concerns, stop splitting cuddled "(..." into two lines.
Note that, as an implementation artifact, due to sed's line-oriented
nature, this change inserts a blank line at output time just before the
"(..." line is emitted. It would be possible to suppress this blank line
but doing so would add a fair bit of complexity to chainlint.sed.
Therefore, rather than suppressing the extra blank line, the Makefile's
`check-chainlint` target which runs the chainlint self-tests is instead
modified to ignore blank lines when comparing chainlint output against
the self-test "expect" output. This is a reasonable compromise for two
reasons. First, the purpose of the chainlint self-tests is to verify
that the ?!AMP?! annotations are being correctly added; precise
whitespace is immaterial. Second, by necessity, chainlint.sed itself
already throws away all blank lines within subshells since, when
checking for a broken &&-chain, it needs to check the final _statement_
in a subshell, not the final _line_ (which might be blank), thus it has
never made any attempt to precisely reproduce blank lines in its output.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When checking for broken a &&-chain, chainlint.sed knows that the final
statement in a subshell should not end with `&&`, so it takes care to
make a distinction between the final line which is an actual statement
and any lines which may be mere comments preceding the closing ')'. As
such, it swallows comment lines so that they do not interfere with the
&&-chain check.
However, since `sed` does not provide any sort of real recursion,
chainlint.sed only checks &&-chains in subshells one level deep; it
doesn't do any checking in deeper subshells or in `{...}` blocks within
subshells. Furthermore, on account of potential implementation
complexity, it doesn't check &&-chains within `case` arms.
Due to an oversight, it also doesn't swallow comments inside deep
subshells, `{...}` blocks, or `case` statements, which makes its output
inconsistent (swallowing comments in some cases but not others).
Unfortunately, this inconsistency seeps into the chainlint self-test
"expect" files, which potentially makes it difficult to reuse the
self-tests should a more capable chainlint ever be developed. Therefore,
teach chainlint.sed to consistently swallow comments in all cases.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The purpose of chainlint is to highlight problems it finds in test code
by inserting annotations at the location of each problem. Arbitrarily
eliding bits of the code it is checking is not helpful, yet this is
exactly what chainlint.sed does by cavalierly and unnecessarily dropping
the here-doc operator and tag; i.e. `cat <<TAG` becomes simply `cat` in
the output. This behavior can make it more difficult for the test writer
to align the annotated output of chainlint.sed with the original test
code. Address this by retaining here-doc tags.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tighten here-doc recognition to prevent it from being fooled by text
which looks like a here-doc operator but happens merely to be the
content of a string, such as this real-world case from t7201:
echo "<<<<<<< ours" &&
echo ourside &&
echo "=======" &&
echo theirside &&
echo ">>>>>>> theirs"
This problem went unnoticed because chainlint.sed is not a real parser,
but rather applies heuristics to pretend to understand shell code. In
this case, it saw what it thought was a here-doc operator (`<< ours`),
and fell off the end of the test looking for the closing tag "ours"
which it never found, thus swallowed the remainder of the test without
checking it for &&-chain breakage.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
According to POSIX, "<<" and "<<-" are distinct shell operators. For the
latter to be recognized, no whitespace is allowed before the "-", though
whitespace is allowed after the operator. However, the chainlint
patterns which identify here-docs are both too loose and too tight,
incorrectly allowing whitespace between "<<" and "-" but disallowing it
between "-" and the here-doc tag. Fix the patterns to better match
POSIX.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
chainlint.sed inserts a ">" annotation at the beginning of a line to
signal that its heuristics have identified an end-of-subshell. This was
useful as a debugging aid during development of the script, but it has
no value to test writers and might even confuse them into thinking that
the linter is misbehaving by inserting line-noise into the shell code it
is validating. Moreover, its presence also potentially makes it
difficult to reuse the chainlint self-test "expect" output should a more
capable linter ever be developed. Therefore, drop the ">" annotation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
>From inception, when chainlint.sed encountered a line using semicolon to
separate commands rather than `&&`, it would insert a ?!SEMI?!
annotation at the beginning of the line rather ?!AMP?! even though the
&&-chain is also broken by the semicolon. Given a line such as:
?!SEMI?! cmd1; cmd2 &&
the ?!SEMI?! annotation makes it easier to see what the problem is than
if the output had been:
?!AMP?! cmd1; cmd2 &&
which might confuse the test author into thinking that the linter is
broken (since the line clearly ends with `&&`).
However, now that the ?!AMP?! an ?!SEMI?! annotations are inserted at
the point of breakage rather than at the beginning of the line, and
taking into account that both represent a broken &&-chain, there is
little reason to distinguish between the two. Using ?!AMP?! alone is
sufficient to point the test author at the problem. For instance, in:
cmd1; ?!AMP?! cmd2 &&
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between `cmd1` and `cmd2`.
Likewise, in:
cmd1 && cmd2 ?!AMP?!
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between `cmd2` and `cmd3`.
Finally, in:
cmd1; ?!AMP?! cmd2 ?!AMP?!
cmd3
it is clear that the &&-chain is broken between each command.
Hence, there is no longer a good reason to make a distinction between a
broken &&-chain due to a semicolon and a broken chain due to a missing
`&&` at end-of-line. Therefore, drop the ?!SEMI?! annotation and use
?!AMP?! exclusively.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
chainlint.sed flags ";" when used as a command terminator since it
breaks the &&-chain, thus can allow failures to go undetected. However,
when a command terminated by ";" is the last command in the body of a
compound statement, such as `command-2` in:
if test $# -gt 1
then
command-1 &&
command-2;
fi
then the ";" is harmless and the exit code from `command-2` is passed
through untouched and becomes the exit code of the compound statement,
as if the ";" was not present. Therefore, tolerate a trailing ";" in
this position rather than complaining about broken &&-chain.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When chainlint.sed detects commands separated by a semicolon rather than
by `&&`, it places a ?!SEMI?! annotation at the beginning of the line.
However, this is an unusual location for programmers accustomed to error
messages (from compilers, for instance) indicating the exact point of
the problem. Therefore, relocate the ?!SEMI?! annotation to the location
of the semicolon in order to better direct the programmer's attention to
the source of the problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When chainlint.sed detects a broken &&-chain, it places an ?!AMP?!
annotation at the beginning of the line. However, this is an unusual
location for programmers accustomed to error messages (from compilers,
for instance) indicating the exact point of the problem. Therefore,
relocate the ?!AMP?! annotation to the end of the line in order to
better direct the programmer's attention to the source of the problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rather than running `chainlint` and `diff` once per self-test -- which
may become expensive as more tests are added -- instead run `chainlint`
a single time over all tests bodies collectively and compare the result
to the collective "expected" output.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The purpose of chainlint.sed is to detect &&-chain breakage only within
subshells (one level deep); it doesn't bother checking for top-level
&&-chain breakage since the &&-chain checker built into t/test-lib.sh
should detect broken &&-chains outside of subshells by making them
magically exit with code 117.
Unfortunately, one of the chainlint.sed self-tests has overly intimate
knowledge of this particular division of responsibilities and only cares
about what chainlint.sed itself will produce, while ignoring the fact
that a more all-encompassing linter would complain about a broken
&&-chain outside the subshell. This makes it difficult to re-use the
test with a more capable chainlint implementation should one ever be
developed. Therefore, adjust the test and its "expected" output to
avoid being specific to the tunnel-vision of this one implementation.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The purpose of chainlint.sed is to detect &&-chain breakage only within
subshells (one level deep); it doesn't bother checking for top-level
&&-chain breakage since the &&-chain checker built into t/test-lib.sh
should detect broken &&-chains outside of subshells by making them
magically exit with code 117. However, this division of labor may not
always be the case if a more capable chainlint implementation is ever
developed. Beyond that, due to being sed-based and due to its use of
heuristics, chainlint.sed has several limitations (such as being unable
to detect &&-chain breakage in subshells more than one level deep since
it only manually emulates recursion into a subshell).
Some of the comments in the chainlint self-tests unnecessarily reflect
the limitations of chainlint.sed even though those limitations are not
what is being tested. Therefore, simplify and generalize the comments to
explain only what is being tested, thus ensuring that they won't become
outdated if a more capable chainlint is ever developed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The chainlint self-test code snippets are supposed to represent the body
of a test_expect_success() or test_expect_failure(), yet the contents of
a few tests would have caused the shell to report syntax errors had they
been real test bodies due to the mix of single- and double-quotes.
Although chainlint.sed, with its simplistic heuristics, is blind to this
problem, a future more robust chainlint implementation might not have
such a limitation. Therefore, stop mixing quote types haphazardly in
those tests and unify quoting throughout. While at it, drop chunks of
tests which merely repeat what is already tested elsewhere but with
alternative quotes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The chainlint self-test code snippets are supposed to represent the body
of a test_expect_success() or test_expect_failure(), yet the contents of
these tests would have caused the shell to report syntax errors had they
been real test bodies. Although chainlint.sed, with its simplistic
heuristics, is blind to these syntactic problems, a future more robust
chainlint implementation might not have such a limitation, so make these
snippets syntactically valid.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add pieces from "scalar" to contrib/.
* js/scalar:
scalar: implement the `version` command
scalar: implement the `delete` command
scalar: teach 'reconfigure' to optionally handle all registered enlistments
scalar: allow reconfiguring an existing enlistment
scalar: implement the `run` command
scalar: teach 'clone' to support the --single-branch option
scalar: implement the `clone` subcommand
scalar: implement 'scalar list'
scalar: let 'unregister' handle a deleted enlistment directory gracefully
scalar: 'unregister' stops background maintenance
scalar: 'register' sets recommended config and starts maintenance
scalar: create test infrastructure
scalar: start documenting the command
scalar: create a rudimentary executable
scalar: add a README with a roadmap
Teach diff and blame to work well with sparse index.
* ld/sparse-diff-blame:
blame: enable and test the sparse index
diff: enable and test the sparse index
diff: replace --staged with --cached in t1092 tests
repo-settings: prepare_repo_settings only in git repos
test-read-cache: set up repo after git directory
commit-graph: return if there is no git directory
git: ensure correct git directory setup with -h
"git name-rev" has been tweaked to give output that is shorter and
easier to understand.
* en/name-rev-shorter-output:
name-rev: prefer shorter names over following merges
"git fetch" without the "--update-head-ok" option ought to protect
a checked out branch from getting updated, to prevent the working
tree that checks it out to go out of sync. The code was written
before the use of "git worktree" got widespread, and only checked
the branch that was checked out in the current worktree, which has
been updated.
(originally called ak/fetch-not-overwrite-any-current-branch)
* ak/protect-any-current-branch:
branch: protect branches checked out in all worktrees
receive-pack: protect current branch for bare repository worktree
receive-pack: clean dead code from update_worktree()
fetch: protect branches checked out in all worktrees
worktree: simplify find_shared_symref() memory ownership model
branch: lowercase error messages
receive-pack: lowercase error messages
fetch: lowercase error messages
The cryptographic signing using ssh keys can specify literal keys
for keytypes whose name do not begin with the "ssh-" prefix by
using the "key::" prefix mechanism (e.g. "key::ecdsa-sha2-nistp256").
* fs/ssh-signing-other-keytypes:
ssh signing: make sign/amend test more resilient
ssh signing: support non ssh-* keytypes
Extend the signing of objects with SSH keys and learn to pay
attention to the key validity time range when verifying.
* fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime:
ssh signing: verify ssh-keygen in test prereq
ssh signing: make fmt-merge-msg consider key lifetime
ssh signing: make verify-tag consider key lifetime
ssh signing: make git log verify key lifetime
ssh signing: make verify-commit consider key lifetime
ssh signing: add key lifetime test prereqs
ssh signing: use sigc struct to pass payload
t/fmt-merge-msg: make gpgssh tests more specific
t/fmt-merge-msg: do not redirect stderr
When "git log" implicitly enabled the "decoration" processing
without being explicitly asked with "--decorate" option, it failed
to read and honor the settings given by the "--decorate-refs"
option.
* jk/log-decorate-opts-with-implicit-decorate:
log: load decorations with --simplify-by-decoration
log: handle --decorate-refs with userformat "%d"
"git rebase -x" added an unnecessary 'exec' instructions before
'noop', which has been corrected.
* en/rebase-x-fix:
sequencer: avoid adding exec commands for non-commit creating commands
The single-key-input mode in "git add -p" had some code to handle
keys that generate a sequence of input via ReadKey(), which did not
handle end-of-file correctly, which has been fixed.
* cb/add-p-single-key-fix:
add -p: avoid use of undefined $key when ReadKey -> EOF
The completion script (in contrib/) learns that the "--date"
option of commands from the "git log" family takes "human" and
"auto" as valid values.
* yn/complete-date-format-options:
completion: add human and auto: date format
When a non-existent program is given as the pager, we tried to
reuse an uninitialized child_process structure and crashed, which
has been fixed.
* em/missing-pager:
pager: fix crash when pager program doesn't exist
"git submodule deinit" for a submodule whose .git metadata
directory is embedded in its working tree refused to work, until
the submodule gets converted to use the "absorbed" form where the
metadata directory is stored in superproject, and a gitfile at the
top-level of the working tree of the submodule points at it. The
command is taught to convert such submodules to the absorbed form
as needed.
* mp/absorb-submodule-git-dir-upon-deinit:
submodule: absorb git dir instead of dying on deinit
The function to cull a child process and determine the exit status
had two separate code paths for normal callers and callers in a
signal handler, and the latter did not yield correct value when the
child has caught a signal. The handling of the exit status has
been unified for these two code paths. An existing test with
flakiness has also been corrected.
* jk/t7006-sigpipe-tests-fix:
t7006: simplify exit-code checks for sigpipe tests
t7006: clean up SIGPIPE handling in trace2 tests
run-command: unify signal and regular logic for wait_or_whine()
"git fetch", when received a bad packfile, can fail with SIGPIPE.
This wasn't wrong per-se, but we now detect the situation and fail
in a more predictable way.
* jk/fetch-pack-avoid-sigpipe-to-index-pack:
fetch-pack: ignore SIGPIPE when writing to index-pack
Various operating modes of "git reset" have been made to work
better with the sparse index.
* vd/sparse-reset:
unpack-trees: improve performance of next_cache_entry
reset: make --mixed sparse-aware
reset: make sparse-aware (except --mixed)
reset: integrate with sparse index
reset: expand test coverage for sparse checkouts
sparse-index: update command for expand/collapse test
reset: preserve skip-worktree bit in mixed reset
reset: rename is_missing to !is_in_reset_tree
On platforms where ulong is shorter than size_t, code paths that
shifted 1 or 1U to the left lacked the necessary cast to size_t,
which have been corrected.
* po/size-t-for-vs:
object-file.c: LLP64 compatibility, upcast unity for left shift
diffcore-delta.c: LLP64 compatibility, upcast unity for left shift
repack.c: LLP64 compatibility, upcast unity for left shift
The advice message given by "git pull" when the user hasn't made a
choice between merge and rebase still said that the merge is the
default, which no longer is the case. This has been corrected.
* ah/advice-pull-has-no-preference-between-rebase-and-merge:
pull: don't say that merge is "the default strategy"
