This makes the code DRYer, with the obvious benefit that we can enhance
the code further in a single place.
We can also reuse the functionality elsewhere by calling this new
function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The sequencer already knew how to fast-forward instead of
cherry-picking, if possible.
We want to continue to do this, of course, but in case of the 'reword'
command, we will need to call `git commit` after fast-forwarding.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is now trivial, as all the building blocks are in place: all we need
to do is to flip the "edit" switch when committing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When doing an interactive rebase, we want to leave a 'patch' file for
further inspection by the user (even if we never tried to actually apply
that patch, since we're cherry-picking instead).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
An interactive rebase operates on a detached HEAD (to keep the reflog
of the original branch relatively clean), and updates the branch only
at the end.
Now that the sequencer learns to perform interactive rebases, it also
needs to learn the trick to update the branch before removing the
directory containing the state of the interactive rebase.
We introduce a new head_ref variable in a wider scope than necessary at
the moment, to allow for a later patch that prints out "Successfully
rebased and updated <ref>".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When the last command of an interactive rebase fails, the user needs to
resolve the problem and then continue the interactive rebase. Naturally,
the todo script is empty by then. So let's not complain about that!
To that end, let's move that test out of the function that parses the
todo script, and into the more high-level function read_populate_todo().
This is also necessary by now because the lower-level parse_insn_buffer()
has no idea whether we are performing an interactive rebase or not.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When a cherry-pick continues without a "todo script", the intention is
simply to pick a single commit.
However, when an interactive rebase is continued without a "todo
script", it means that the last command has been completed and that we
now need to clean up.
This commit guards the revert/cherry-pick specific steps so that they
are not executed in rebase -i mode.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When an interactive rebase is interrupted, the user may stage changes
before continuing, and we need to commit those changes in that case.
Please note that the nested "if" added to the sequencer_continue() is
not combined into a single "if" because it will be extended with an
"else" clause in a later patch in this patch series.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When the interactive rebase aborts, it writes out an author-script file
to record the author information for the current commit. As we are about
to teach the sequencer how to perform the actions behind an interactive
rebase, it needs to write those author-script files, too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
For users' convenience, most rebase commands can be abbreviated, e.g.
'p' instead of 'pick' and 'x' instead of 'exec'. Let's teach the
sequencer to handle those abbreviated commands just fine.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This is a huge patch, and at the same time a huge step forward to
execute the performance-critical parts of the interactive rebase in a
builtin command.
Since 'fixup' and 'squash' are not only similar, but also need to know
about each other (we want to reduce a series of fixups/squashes into a
single, final commit message edit, from the user's point of view), we
really have to implement them both at the same time.
Most of the actual work is done by the existing code path that already
handles the "pick" and the "edit" commands; We added support for other
features (e.g. to amend the commit message) in the patches leading up to
this one, yet there are still quite a few bits in this patch that simply
would not make sense as individual patches (such as: determining whether
there was anything to "fix up" in the "todo" script, etc).
In theory, it would be possible to reuse the fast-forward code path also
for the fixup and the squash code paths, but in practice this would make
the code less readable. The end result cannot be fast-forwarded anyway,
therefore let's just extend the cherry-picking code path for now.
Since the sequencer parses the entire `git-rebase-todo` script in one go,
fixup or squash commands without a preceding pick can be reported early
(in git-rebase--interactive, we could only report such errors just before
executing the fixup/squash).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
In the interactive rebase, commands that were successfully processed are
not simply discarded, but appended to the 'done' file instead. This is
used e.g. to display the current state to the user in the output of
`git status` or the progress.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When calling `git rebase -i -v`, the user wants to see some statistics
after the commits were rebased. Let's show some.
The strbuf we use to perform that task will be used for other things
in subsequent commits, hence it is declared and initialized in a wider
scope than strictly needed here.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The 'exec' command is a little special among rebase -i's commands, as it
does *not* have a SHA-1 as first parameter. Instead, everything after the
`exec` command is treated as command-line to execute.
Let's reuse the arg/arg_len fields of the todo_item structure (which hold
the oneline for pick/edit commands) to point to the command-line.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This patch is a straight-forward reimplementation of the `edit`
operation of the interactive rebase command.
Well, not *quite* straight-forward: when stopping, the `edit`
command wants to write the `patch` file (which is not only the
patch, but includes the commit message and author information). To
that end, this patch requires the earlier work that taught the
log-tree machinery to respect the `file` setting of
rev_info->diffopt to write to a file stream different than stdout.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The 'noop' command is probably the most boring of all rebase -i commands
to support in the sequencer.
Which makes it an excellent candidate for this first stab to add support
for rebase -i's commands to the sequencer.
For the moment, let's also treat empty lines and commented-out lines as
'noop'; We will refine that handling later in this patch series.
To make it easier to identify "classes" of todo_commands (such as:
determine whether a command is pick-like, i.e. handles a single commit),
let's enforce a certain order of said commands.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This patch introduces a new action for the sequencer. It really does not
do a whole lot of its own right now, but lays the ground work for
patches to come. The intention, of course, is to finally make the
sequencer the work horse of the interactive rebase (the original idea
behind the "sequencer" concept).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
It is actually not safe to look for a commit message by looking for the
first empty line and skipping it.
The find_commit_subject() function looks more carefully, so let's use
it. Since we are interested in the entire commit message, we re-compute
the string length after verifying that the commit subject is not empty
(in which case the entire commit message would be empty, something that
should not happen but that we want to handle gracefully).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
It is the current coding style of the Git project to write
if (...) {
...
} else {
...
}
instead of putting the closing brace and the "else" keyword on separate
lines.
Pointed out by Junio Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This was noticed while addressing Junio Hamano's concern that some
"else" operators were on separate lines than the preceding closing
brace.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The changes in upstream/maint are actually not really that crucial for Git
for Windows, but we can use it as an excuse to fix the branch thicket: the
`visual-studio` branch clearly wants to be based on the
`jeffhostetler/vs2015` branch, as the latter contains important compile
fixes for Visual C, required to build inside Visual Studio.
While at it, we also move the Vagrant patches farther to the end, as they
are unlikely to be accepted upstream, so we'll try only after getting the
MSVC/VS patches in.
Also, let's reorder a couple other patches into more logical places.
This commit starts the rebase of 4638a925c0 to a274e0a036
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When Git's source code calls isatty(), it really asks whether the
respective file descriptor is connected to an interactive terminal.
Windows' _isatty() function, however, determines whether the file
descriptor is associated with a character device. And NUL, Windows'
equivalent of /dev/null, is a character device.
Which means that for years, Git mistakenly detected an associated
interactive terminal when being run through the test suite, which
almost always redirects stdin, stdout and stderr to /dev/null.
This bug only became obvious, and painfully so, when the new
bisect--helper entered the `pu` branch and made the automatic build & test
time out because t6030 was waiting for an answer.
For details, see
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f4s0ddew.aspx
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This merges the "Pre-release to test fixes for #981 and #987".
These commits were actually meant to land in `master` before merging the
Pull Requests; Better late than never.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Use ALLOC_GROW() macro when reallocing a string_list array
rather than simply increasing it by 32. This is a performance
optimization.
During status on a very large repo and there are many changes,
a significant percentage of the total run time was spent
reallocing the wt_status.changes array.
This change decreased the time in wt_status_collect_changes_worktree()
from 125 seconds to 45 seconds on my very large repository.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
In particular when local tags are used (or tags that are pushed to some
fork) to build Git, it is very hard to figure out from which particular
revision a particular Git executable was built.
Let's just report that in our build options.
We need to be careful, though, to report when the current commit cannot be
determined, e.g. when building from a tarball without any associated Git
repository.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
It is common in corporate setups to have permissions managed via a
domain account. That means that the user does not really have to log in
when accessing a central repository via https://, but that the login
credentials are used to authenticate with that repository.
The common way to do that used to require empty credentials, i.e. hitting
Enter twice when being asked for user name and password, or by using the
very funny notation https://:@server/repository
A recent commit (5275c3081c (http: http.emptyauth should allow empty (not
just NULL) usernames, 2016-10-04)) broke that usage, though, all of a
sudden requiring users to set http.emptyAuth = true.
Which brings us to the bigger question why http.emptyAuth defaults to
false, to begin with.
It would be one thing if cURL would not let the user specify credentials
interactively after attempting NTLM authentication (i.e. login
credentials), but that is not the case.
It would be another thing if attempting NTLM authentication was not
usually what users need to do when trying to authenticate via https://.
But that is also not the case.
So let's just go ahead and change the default, and unbreak the NTLM
authentication. As a bonus, this also makes the "you need to hit Enter
twice" (which is hard to explain: why enter empty credentials when you
want to authenticate with your login credentials?) and the ":@" hack
(which is also pretty, pretty hard to explain to users) obsolete.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/987
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Teach add_index_entry_with_check() and has_dir_name()
to see if the path of the new item is greater than the
last path in the index array before attempting to search
for it.
This is a performance optimization.
During checkout, merge_working_tree() populates the new
index in sorted order, so this change saves at least 2
lookups per file.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
This is a performance optimization.
Teach do_read_index() to call verify_hdr() using a thread
and allow SHA1 verification to run concurrently with the
parsing of index-entries and extensions.
For large index files, this cuts the startup time in half.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
For regular debugging, it is pretty helpful when a debug assertion in a
running application triggers a window that offers to start the debugger.
However, when running the test suite, it is not so helpful, in
particular when the debug assertions are then suppressed anyway because
we disable the invalid parameter checking (via invalidcontinue.obj, see
the comment in config.mak.uname about that object for more information).
So let's simply disable that window in Debug Mode (it is already
disabled in Release Mode).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This topic branch teaches the project generator to generate a Visual
Studio solution, ready to be opened in Visual Studio 2010 or later.
The idea, of course, is to let some automatic build job generate and
commit the project files with
make MSVC=1 vcxproj
and then (force-)push to a special-purpose branch.
The major part of this branch thicket concerns itself not only with
generating the Visual Studio project files, but making sure that the
user can then run the test suite from a regular Git Bash (i.e. *not*
requiring a Git for Windows SDK), e.g. by running
cd t
prove --timer --jobs 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This branch fixes the problem where merge-recursive's add_cacheinfo()
expected refresh_cache_entry() always to return a valid cache entry (but
it does not do that e.g. when the file in the worktree is modified).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This topic branch brings the new, experimental builtin version of the
difftool into Git for Windows' master branch.
It still hands off to the legacy Perl script unless the feature flag is
flipped: only when the config setting difftool.useBuiltin is set to true
will `git difftool` actually use the experimental builtin. The idea is to
play it safe for the majority of users, but to allow heavy difftool users
to test early and to help make the builtin robust, before we actually
retire the Perl script.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
The entire idea of generating the VS solution makes only sense if we
generate it via Continuous Integration; otherwise potential users would
still have to download the entire Git for Windows SDK.
So let's just add a target in the Makefile that can be used to generate
said solution; The generated files will then be committed so that they
can be pushed to a branch ready to check out by Visual Studio users.
To make things even more useful, we also generate and commit other files
that are required to run the test suite, such as templates and
bin-wrappers: with this, developers can run the test suite in a regular
Git Bash (that is part of a regular Git for Windows installation) after
building the solution in Visual Studio.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When building with Microsoft Visual C, we use NuGet to acquire the
dependencies (such as OpenSSL, cURL, etc). We even unpack those
dependencies.
This patch teaches the test suite to add the directory with the unpacked
.dll files to the PATH before running the tests.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
We already unpack the NuGet packages in a certain place, via
compat/vcbuild/Makefile. Let's let Visual Studio use the very same place.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
This file is not available in earlier MSVC versions, and it is not
necessary to include it with MSVC, anyway.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
