* mm/phrase-remote-tracking:
git-branch.txt: mention --set-upstream as a way to change upstream configuration
user-manual: remote-tracking can be checked out, with detached HEAD
user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch terms
Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C code
Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking"
Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch"
everyday.txt: change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch"
Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places
Replace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking"
Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status
* master:
tests: use test_cmp instead of piping to diff(1)
t7004-tag.sh: re-arrange git tag comment for clarity
rebase -X: do not clobber strategy
Documentation: document show -s
dir.c: fix EXC_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR match in sparse checkout
Add OPT__FORCE as a helper macro in the same spirit as OPT__VERBOSE
et.al. to simplify defining -f/--force options.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lstfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allows better help text to be defined than "be quiet". Also make use
of the macro in a place that already had a different description. No
object code changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allows better help text to be defined than "dry run". Also make use
of the macro in places that already had a different description. No
object code changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allows better help text to be defined than "be verbose". Also make use
of the macro in places that already had a different description. No
object code changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In case HEAD does not point to a valid commit yet, merge is
implemented as a hard reset. This will cause untracked files to be
overwritten.
Instead, assume the empty tree for HEAD and do a regular merge. An
untracked file will cause the merge to abort and do nothing. If no
conflicting files are present, the merge will have the same effect
as a hard reset.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change submodule tests that piped to diff(1) to use test_cmp. The
resulting unified diff is easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Split the "message in editor has initial comment" test into three
tests. The motivation is to be able to only skip the middle part under
NO_GETTEXT_POISON.
In addition the return value of 'git tag' was being returned. We now
check that it's non-zero. I used ! instead of test_must_fail so that
the GIT_EDITOR variable was only used in this command invocation, and
because the surrounding tests use this style.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When an initial --in-reply-to is supplied, make it apply only to the
first message; --[no-]chain-reply-to setting are honored by second and
subsequent messages; this is also how the git-format-patch option with
the same name behaves.
Moreover, when $initial_reply_to is asked to the user interactively it
is asked as the "Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the _first_
email", this makes the user think that the second and subsequent
patches are not using it but are considered as replies to the first
message or chained according to the --[no-]chain-reply setting.
Look at the v2 series in the illustration to see what the new behavior
ensures:
(before the patch) | (after the patch)
[PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did... | [PATCH 0/2] Here is what I did...
[PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests | [PATCH 1/2] Clean up and tests
[PATCH 2/2] Implementation | [PATCH 2/2] Implementation
[PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll | [PATCH v2 0/3] Here is a reroll
[PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up | [PATCH v2 1/3] Clean up
[PATCH v2 2/3] New tests | [PATCH v2 2/3] New tests
[PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation | [PATCH v2 3/3] Implementation
This is the typical behaviour we want when we send a series with cover
letter in reply to some discussion, the new patch series should appear
as a separate subtree in the discussion.
Also update the documentation on --in-reply-to to describe the new
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If any strategy options are passed to -X, the strategy will always be
set to 'recursive'. According to the documentation, it should default to
'recursive' if it is not set, but it should be possible to set it to
other values.
This fixes a regression introduced in v1.7.3-rc0~67^2 (2010-07-29).
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous text was not exactly accurate; it is OK to
change space and minus lines, but only in certain ways.
This patch takes a whole new approach, which is to describe
the sorts of conceptual operations you might want to
perform. It also includes a healthy dose of warnings about
how things can go wrong.
Since the size of the text is getting quite long, it also
splits this out into an "editing patches" section. This
makes more sense with the current structure, anyway, which
already splits out the interactive mode description.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use test_might_fail instead of ignoring the exit status from git
config --unset, and let the exit status propagate past rm -f (which
does not fail on ENOENT). Otherwise bugs that lead git config to
crash would not be detected when this test runs.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The same code to check the position of HEAD is used by several
tests in this script. Factor it out as a function and simplify it.
Noticed using an &&-chaining tester, because the current code
does not propagate the precise exit status from errors.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a comment describing the setup in t3404 to its --help output.
This should make it easier to decide where to put new functions
without disrupting the flow of the file or obstructing the description
of the test setup.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow test_commit failures in loop iterations before the last one to
cause the test assertion to fail.
More importantly, avoiding these loops makes the test a little
simpler to read and decreases the vertical screen footprint of
the setup test assertion by one line.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the test_expect_code helper instead of open-coding it.
The main behavior change is to print the command and actual exit
status when the test fails. More importantly, this would make it
easier to add commands before "git notes show" as part of the
same test assertion if needed.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As t/README explains:
When a gitcommand dies due to a segfault, test_must_fail
diagnoses it as an error; "! git <command>" treats it as
just another expected failure, which would let such a bug
go unnoticed.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rev-parse --parseopt exits with code 129 (usage error) when asked
to dump usage with -h on behalf of another command. Scripts can
take advantage of this to avoid trying to parse usage information
as though it were the regular output from some git command.
Noticed with an &&-chaining tester.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using 'return' in an attempt to end a test assertion can have
unpredictable results (probably escaping from test_run_ and breaking
its bookkeeping). Redo the control flow using helpers like
test_expect_code and git diff --exit-code, so each test assertion can
follow the usual form
command that should succeed &&
command that should succeed &&
command that should succeed &&
...
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some tests check their output with code like the following:
test "$(git ls-files -u B | wc -l)" -eq 3 || {
echo "BAD: should have left stages for B"
return 1
}
The verbose failure condition is used because test, unlike
diff, does not print any useful information about the
nature of the failure when it fails.
Introduce a test_line_count function to help. If used like
git ls-files -u B >output &&
test_line_count -eq 3 output
it will produce output like
test_line_count: line count for output !-eq 3
100644 b023018cabc396e7692c70bbf5784a93d3f738ab 2 hi.c
100644 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057 3 hi.c
on failure.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Same rules as before: this patch only adds " &&" to the end of
some lines in the test suite.
Intended to be applied on top of or squashed with the last
batch if they look okay.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide
failures from earlier commands in the chain.
Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or
test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git's diff machinery has supported a -s (silence diff output) option
as far back as v0.99~900 (Silent flag for show-diff, 2005-04-13), but
the option is only advertised in an odd corner of the git diff-tree
manual.
The main use is to retrieve basic metadata about a commit:
git show -s rev
Explain this in the 'git log' manual and provide an example in the
'git show' examples section. This is kind of a cop-out, since it
would be more useful to explain it in the 'git show' manual proper,
which says:
The command takes options applicable to the git
diff-tree command to control how the changes the
commit introduces are shown.
This manual page describes only the most frequently
used options.
Fixing that is a larger task for another day.
Reported-by: Will Hall <will@gnatter.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit c84de70 (excluded_1(): support exclude files in index -
2009-08-20) tries to work around the fact that there is no
directory/file information in index entries, therefore
EXC_FLAG_MUSTBEDIR match would fail.
Unfortunately the workaround is flawed. This fixes it.
Reported-by: Thomas Rinderknecht <thomasr@sailguy.org>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1. When --in-reply-to gives $reply_to, the first one becomes a reply to
that message, with or without --chain-reply-to.
2. When --chain-reply-to is in effect, all the messages are strung
together to form a single chain. The first message may be in reply to
the $reply_to given by --in-reply-to command line option (see
previous), or the root of the discussion thread. The second one is a
response to the first one, and the third one is a response to the
second one, etc.
3. When --chain-reply-to is not in effect:
a. When --in-reply-to is used, too, the second and the subsequent ones
become replies to $reply_to. Together with the first rule, all
messages become replies to $reply_to given by --in-reply-to.
b. When --in-reply-to is not used, presumably the second and
subsequent ones become replies to the first one, which would be the
root.
The documentation is reasonably clear about the 1., 2. and 3a. above, I
think, even though I do not think 3b. is clearly specified.
The two tests added by this patch at least documents what happens between
these two options.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jn/gitweb-test:
gitweb/Makefile: Include gitweb/config.mak
gitweb/Makefile: Add 'test' and 'test-installed' targets
t/gitweb-lib.sh: Add support for GITWEB_TEST_INSTALLED
gitweb: Move call to evaluate_git_version after evaluate_gitweb_config
* en/merge-recursive: (40 commits)
merge-recursive:make_room_for_directories - work around dumb compilers
merge-recursive: Remove redundant path clearing for D/F conflicts
merge-recursive: Make room for directories in D/F conflicts
handle_delete_modify(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present
merge_content(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present
conflict_rename_rename_1to2(): Fix checks for presence of D/F conflicts
conflict_rename_delete(): Check whether D/F conflicts are still present
merge-recursive: Delay modify/delete conflicts if D/F conflict present
merge-recursive: Delay content merging for renames
merge-recursive: Delay handling of rename/delete conflicts
merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to other file
merge-recursive: Move handling of double rename of one file to two
merge-recursive: Avoid doubly merging rename/add conflict contents
merge-recursive: Update merge_content() call signature
merge-recursive: Update conflict_rename_rename_1to2() call signature
merge-recursive: Structure process_df_entry() to handle more cases
merge-recursive: Have process_entry() skip D/F or rename entries
merge-recursive: New function to assist resolving renames in-core only
merge-recursive: New data structures for deferring of D/F conflicts
merge-recursive: Move process_entry's content merging into a function
...
* cb/leading-path-removal:
do not overwrite files in leading path
lstat_cache: optionally return match_len
add function check_ok_to_remove()
t7607: add leading-path tests
t7607: use test-lib functions and check MERGE_HEAD
* jk/push-progress:
push: pass --progress down to git-pack-objects
t5523-push-upstream: test progress messages
t5523-push-upstream: add function to ensure fresh upstream repo
test_terminal: ensure redirections work reliably
test_terminal: catch use without TTY prerequisite
test-lib: allow test code to check the list of declared prerequisites
tests: test terminal output to both stdout and stderr
tests: factor out terminal handling from t7006
