'test_set_prereq's description claims that prereqs can be specified to
'test_expect_code', but that is not the case (it is not meant to run a
test _case_, but a git command), so remove it.
OTOH that description doesn't mention 'test_external' and
'test_external_without_stderr' that do accept prereqs, so mention
them.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some test prereqs depend on other prereqs, so in a couple of cases we
have nested prereqs that look something like this:
test_lazy_prereq FOO '
test_have_prereq BAR &&
check-foo
'
This can be problematic, because lazy prereqs are evaluated in the
'$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir' directory, which is the same for
every prereq, and which is automatically removed after the prereq has
been evaluated. So if the inner prereq (BAR above) is a lazy prereq
that hasn't been evaluated yet, then after its evaluation the
'prereq-test-dir' shared with the outer prereq will be removed.
Consequently, 'check-foo' will find itself in a non-existing
directory, and won't be able to create/access any files in its cwd,
which could result in an unfulfilled outer prereq.
Luckily, this doesn't affect any of our current nested prereqs, either
because the inner prereq is not a lazy prereq (e.g. MINGW, CYGWIN or
PERL), or because the outer prereq happens to be checked without
touching any paths in its cwd (GPGSM and RFC1991 in 'lib-gpg.sh').
So to prevent nested prereqs from interfering with each other let's
evaluate each prereq in its own dedicated directory by appending the
prereq's name to the directory name, e.g. 'prereq-test-dir-SYMLINKS'.
In the test we check not only that the prereq test dir is still there,
but also that the inner prereq can't mess with the outer prereq's
files.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During the transition of the test suite to a new default branch name, it
was noticed that this test case succeeded for the wrong reason when the
default branch name was overridden.
While we fixed that in the previous commit, let's make sure that we look
for a tell-tale in the error message that the `git checkout` failed for
the reason we wanted it to fail.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We do have this wonderful shortcut `git checkout -` to go back to the
previous branch, thanks to the reflog.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We settled on the style where the test cases' code starts by the opening
single quote being on the `test_expect_*` line, and the closing quote
being in its own line after the code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ever since 'git pull' learned '--recurse-submodules' in a6d7eb2c7a
(pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only),
2017-06-23), we check if there are local submodule modifications by
checking the revision range 'curr_head --not rebase_fork_point'.
The goal of this check is to abort the pull if there are submodule
modifications in the local commits being rebased, since this scenario is
not supported.
However, the actual range of commits being rebased is not
'rebase_fork_point..curr_head', as the logic in
'get_rebase_newbase_and_upstream' reveals, it is 'upstream..curr_head'.
If the 'git merge-base --fork-point' invocation in
'get_rebase_fork_point' fails to find a fork point between the current
branch and the remote-tracking branch we are pulling from,
'rebase_fork_point' is null and since 4d36f88be7 (submodule: do not pass
null OID to setup_revisions, 2018-05-24), 'submodule_touches_in_range'
checks 'curr_head' and all its ancestors for submodule modifications.
Since it is highly likely that there are submodule modifications in this
range (which is in effect the whole history of the current branch), this
prevents 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules' from succeeding if no
fork point exists between the current branch and the remote-tracking
branch being pulled. This can happen, for example, when the current
branch was forked from a commit which was never recorded in the reflog
of the remote-tracking branch we are pulling, as the last two paragraphs
of the "Discussion on fork-point mode" section in git-merge-base(1)
explain.
Fix this bug by passing 'upstream' instead of 'rebase_fork_point' as the
'excl_oid' argument to 'submodule_touches_in_range'.
Reported-by: Brice Goglin <bgoglin@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It can be hard at first glance to distinguish what is different between
the two tests 'recursive rebasing pull' and 'pull rebase recursing fails
with conflicts' in 't5572-pull-submodule.sh', and to understand how they
relate to the scenarios described in a6d7eb2c7a (pull: optionally rebase
submodules (remote submodule changes only), 2017-06-23), which
implemented '--recurse-submodules' for 'git pull' and added these tests.
Rename the tests to be more descriptive and add some bullet points
comments describing the different scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test 5572.63 ("branch has no merge base with remote-tracking
counterpart") was introduced in 4d36f88be7 (submodule: do not pass null
OID to setup_revisions, 2018-05-24), as a regression test for the bug
this commit was fixing (preventing a 'fatal: bad object' error when the
current branch and the remote-tracking branch we are pulling have no
merge-base).
However, the commit message for 4d36f88be7 does not describe in which
real-life situation this bug was encountered. The brief discussion on the
mailing list [1] does not either.
The regression test is not really representative of a real-life
scenario: both the local repository and its upstream have only a single
commit, and the "no merge-base" scenario is simulated by recreating this
root commit in the local repository using 'git commit-tree' before
calling 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules'. The rebase succeeds
and results in the local branch being reset to the same root commit as
the upstream branch.
The fix in 4d36f88be7 modifies 'submodule.c::submodule_touches_in_range'
so that if 'excl_oid' is null, which is the case when the 'git merge-base
--fork-point' invocation in 'builtin/pull.c::get_rebase_fork_point'
errors (no fork-point), then instead of 'incl_oid --not excl_oid' being
passed to setup_revisions, only 'incl_oid' is passed, and
'submodule_touches_in_range' examines 'incl_oid' and all its ancestors
to verify that they do not touch the submodule.
In test 5572.63, the recreated lone root commit in the local repository is
thus the only commit being examined by 'submodule_touches_in_range', and
this commit *adds* the submodule. However, 'submodule_touches_in_range'
*succeeds* because 'combine-diff.c::diff_tree_combined' (see the
backtrace below) returns early since this commit is the root commit
and has no parents.
#0 diff_tree_combined at combine-diff.c:1494
#1 0x0000000100150cbe in diff_tree_combined_merge at combine-diff.c:1649
#2 0x00000001002c7147 in collect_changed_submodules at submodule.c:869
#3 0x00000001002c7d6f in submodule_touches_in_range at submodule.c:1268
#4 0x00000001000ad58b in cmd_pull at builtin/pull.c:1040
In light of all this, add a note in t5572 documenting this peculiar
test.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180524204729.19896-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/t/#u
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that the Perl version produces the same output as the built-in
version (mostly fixing bugs in the latter), let's add a regression test
to verify that it stays this way.
Note that we only `grep` for the colored error message instead of
verifying that the entire `stderr` consists of just this one line: when
running the test script using the `-x` option to trace the
commands, the sub-shell in `force_color` causes those commands to be
traced into `err.raw` (unless running in Bash where we set the
`BASH_XTRACEFD` variable to avoid that).
Also note that the color reset in the `<BLUE>+<RESET><BLUE>new<RESET>`
line might look funny and unnecessary, as the corresponding `old` line
does not reset the color after the diff marker only to turn the color
back on right away.
However, this is a (necessary) side effect of the white-space check: in
`emit_line_ws_markup()`, we first emit the diff marker via
`emit_line_0()` and then the rest of the line via `ws_check_emit()`. To
leave them somewhat decoupled, the color has to be reset after the diff
marker to allow for the rest of the line to start with another color (or
inverted, in case of white-space issues).
Finally, we have to simulate hunk editing: the `git add -p` command
cannot rely on the internal diff machinery for coloring after letting
the user edit a hunk; It has to "re-color" the edited hunk. This is the
primary reason why that command is interested in the exact values of the
`color.diff.*` settings in the first place. To test this re-coloring, we
therefore have to pretend to edit a hunk and then show that hunk in the
regression test.
Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is currently possible to write multiple "start" commands into
git-update-ref(1) for a single session, but none of them except for the
first one actually have any effect.
Using such nested "start"s may eventually have a sensible effect. One
may imagine that it restarts the current transaction, effectively
emptying it and creating a new one. It may also allow for creation of
nested transactions. But currently, none of these are implemented.
Silently ignoring this misuse is making it hard to iterate in the future
if "start" is ever going to have meaningful semantics in such a context.
This commit thus makes sure to error out in case we see such use.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In commit 0a0fbbe3ff (refs: remove lookup cache for
reference-transaction hook, 2020-08-25), a new benchmark was added to
p1400 which has the intention to exercise creation of multiple
transactions in a single process. As git-update-ref wasn't yet able to
create multiple transactions with a single run we instead used git-push.
As its non-atomic version creates a transaction per reference update,
this was the best approximation we could make at that point in time.
Now that `git-update-ref --stdin` supports creation of multiple
transactions, let's convert the benchmark to use that instead. It has
less overhead and it's also a lot clearer what the actual intention is.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While git-update-ref has recently grown commands which allow interactive
control of transactions in e48cf33b61 (update-ref: implement interactive
transaction handling, 2020-04-02), it is not yet possible to create
multiple transactions in a single session. To do so, one currently still
needs to invoke the executable multiple times.
This commit addresses this shortcoming by allowing the "start" command
to create a new transaction if the current transaction has already been
either committed or aborted.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The testcase t1400 exercises the git-update-ref(1) utility. To do so,
many tests directly read and write references via the filesystem,
assuming that we always use loose and/or packed references. While this
is true now, it'll change with the introduction of the reftable backend.
Convert those tests to use git-update-ref(1) and git-show-ref(1) where
possible. Furthermore, two tests are converted to not delete HEAD
anymore, as this results in a broken repository. They've instead been
updated to create a non-mandatory symbolic reference and delete that
one instead.
Some tests remain which exercise behaviour with broken references, which
cannot currently be converted to use regular git tooling.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 't5310-pack-bitmaps.sh' two tests make sure that our pack bitmaps
are compatible with JGit's bitmaps. Alas, not even the most recent
JGit version (5.9.0.202009080501-r) supports SHA256 yet, so when this
test script is run with GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256 on a setup with
JGit installed in PATH, then these two tests fail.
Protect these two tests with the SHA1 prereq in order to skip them
when testing with SHA256.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A regression has been introduced by a62387b (submodule.c: fetch in
submodules git directory instead of in worktree, 2018-11-28).
The scenario in which it triggers is when one has a remote repository
with a subrepository inside a subrepository like this:
superproject/middle_repo/inner_repo
Person A and B have both a clone of it, while Person B is not working
with the inner_repo and thus does not have it initialized in his working
copy.
Now person A introduces a change to the inner_repo and propagates it
through the middle_repo and the superproject.
Once person A pushed the changes and person B wants to fetch them using
"git fetch" on superproject level, B's git call will return with error
saying:
Could not access submodule 'inner_repo'
Errors during submodule fetch:
middle_repo
Expectation is that in this case the inner submodule will be recognized
as uninitialized subrepository and skipped by the git fetch command.
This used to work correctly before 'a62387b (submodule.c: fetch in
submodules git directory instead of in worktree, 2018-11-28)'.
Starting with a62387b the code wants to evaluate "is_empty_dir()" inside
.git/modules for a directory only existing in the worktree, delivering
then of course wrong return value.
This patch reverts the changes of a62387b and introduces a regression
test.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kaestle <peter.kaestle@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When receive-pack receives a session-id capability from the client, log
the received session ID via a trace2 data event.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When upload-pack (protocol v0/v1) or a protocol v2 server receives a
session-id capability from a client, log the received session ID via a
trace2 data event.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a client receives a session-id capability from a protocol v0, v1,
or v2 server, log the received session ID via a trace2 data event.
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test code clean-up.
* js/test-whitespace-fixes:
t9603: use tabs for indentation
t5570: remove trailing padding
t5400,t5402: consistently indent with tabs, not with spaces
t3427: adjust stale comment
t3406: indent with tabs, not spaces
t1004: insert missing "branch" in a message
Now that hashamp has lazy initialization and a HASHMAP_INIT macro,
hashmaps allocated on the stack can be initialized without a call to
hashmap_init() and in some cases makes the code a bit shorter. Convert
some callsites over to take advantage of this.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the verison negotiation phase between "receive-pack" and
"proc-receive", "proc-receive" can send an empty flush-pkt to end the
negotiation and use default version 0. Capabilities (such as
"push-options") are not supported in version 0.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Johannes found a flaky hang in `t5411/test-0013-bad-protocol.sh` in the
osx-clang job of the CI/PR builds, and ran into an issue when using
the `--stress` option with the following error messages:
fatal: unable to write flush packet: Broken pipe
send-pack: unexpected disconnect while reading sideband packet
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
In this test case, the "proc-receive" hook sends an error message and
dies earlier. While "receive-pack" on the other side of the pipe
should forward the error message of the "proc-receive" hook to the
client side, but it fails to do so. This is because "receive-pack"
uses `packet_write_fmt()` and `packet_flush()` to write pkt-line
message to "proc-receive" hook, and these functions die immediately
when pipe is broken. Using "gently" forms for these functions will get
more predicable output.
Add more "--die-*" options to test helper to test different stages of
the protocol between "receive-pack" and "proc-receive" hook.
Reported-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
New helper `filter_out_user_friendly_and_stable_output` will call
common helpr function `make_user_friendly_and_stable_output` and use
additional arguments to filter out messages for specific test cases.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We taught rev-list a new way to separate options from revisions in
19e8789b23 (revision: allow --end-of-options to end option parsing,
2019-08-06), but rev-parse uses its own parser. It should know about
--end-of-options not only for consistency, but because it may be
presented with similarly ambiguous cases. E.g., if a caller does:
git rev-parse "$rev" -- "$path"
to parse an untrusted input, then it will get confused if $rev contains
an option-like string like "--local-env-vars". Or even "--not-real",
which we'd keep as an option to pass along to rev-list.
Or even more importantly:
git rev-parse --verify "$rev"
can be confused by options, even though its purpose is safely parsing
untrusted input. On the plus side, it will always fail the --verify
part, as it will not have parsed a revision, so the caller will
generally "fail closed" rather than continue to use the untrusted
string. But it will still trigger whatever option was in "$rev"; this
should be mostly harmless, since rev-parse options are all read-only,
but I didn't carefully audit all paths.
This patch lets callers write:
git rev-parse --end-of-options "$rev" -- "$path"
and:
git rev-parse --verify --end-of-options "$rev"
which will both treat "$rev" always as a revision parameter. The latter
is a bit clunky. It would be nicer if we had defined "--verify" to
require that its next argument be the revision. But we have not
historically done so, and:
git rev-parse --verify -q "$rev"
does currently work. I added a test here to confirm that we didn't break
that.
A few implementation notes:
- We don't document --end-of-options explicitly in commands, but rather
in gitcli(7). So I didn't give it its own section in git-rev-parse(1).
But I did call it out specifically in the --verify section, and
include it in the examples, which should show best practices.
- We don't have to re-indent the main option-parsing block, because we
can combine our "did we see end of options" check with "does it start
with a dash". The exception is the pre-setup options, which need
their own block.
- We do however have to pull the "--" parsing out of the "does it start
with dash" block, because we want to parse it even if we've seen
--end-of-options.
- We'll leave "--end-of-options" in the output. This is probably not
technically necessary, as a careful caller will do:
git rev-parse --end-of-options $revs -- $paths
and anything in $revs will be resolved to an object id. However, it
does help a slightly less careful caller like:
git rev-parse --end-of-options $revs_or_paths
where a path "--foo" will remain in the output as long as it also
exists on disk. In that case, it's helpful to retain --end-of-options
to get passed along to rev-list, s it would otherwise see just
"--foo".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because of the order in which we check options in rev-parse, there are a
few options we accept even after a "--". This is wrong, because the
whole point of "--" is to say "everything after here is a path". Let's
move the "did we see a dashdash" check (it's called "as_is" in the code)
to the top of the parsing loop.
Note there is one subtlety here. The options are ordered so that some
are checked before we even see if we're in a repository (they continue
the loop, and if we get past a certain point, then we do the repository
setup). By moving the as_is check higher, it's also in that "before
setup" section, even though it might look at the repository via
verify_filename(). However, this works out: we'd never set as_is until
we parse "--", and we don't parse that until after doing the setup.
An alternative here to avoid the subtlety is to put the as_is check at
the top of the post-setup options. But then every pre-setup option would
have to remember to check "if (!as_is && !strcmp(...))". So while this
is a bit magical, it's harder for future code to get wrong.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 610e2b9240 (blame: validate and peel the object names on the
ignore list, 2020-09-24) git blame reports checks if objects specified
with --ignore-rev and in files loaded with --ignore-revs-file and config
option blame.ignoreRevsFile are actual objects and dies if they aren't.
The intent is to report typos to the user.
This also breaks the ability to use a single ignore file for multiple
repositories. Typos are presumably less likely in files than on the
command line, so alerting is less useful here. Restore that feature by
skipping non-commits without dying.
Reported-by: Jean-Yves Avenard <jyavenard@mozilla.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is possible to have recursive aliases like:
l = log --oneline
lg = l --graph
So the completion should detect such aliases as well.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For the past 15 years, we've used the hardcoded 64 as the length
limit of the filename of the output from the "git format-patch"
command. Since the value is shorter than the 80-column terminal, it
could grow without line wrapping a bit. At the same time, since the
value is longer than half of the 80-column terminal, we could fit
two or more of them in "ls" output on such a terminal if we allowed
to lower it.
Introduce a new command line option --filename-max-length=<n> and a
new configuration variable format.filenameMaxLength to override the
hardcoded default.
While we are at it, remove a check that the name of output directory
does not exceed PATH_MAX---this check is pointless in that by the
time control reaches the function, the caller would already have
done an equivalent of "mkdir -p", so if the system does not like an
overly long directory name, the control wouldn't have reached here,
and otherwise, we know that the system allowed the output directory
to exist. In the worst case, we will get an error when we try to
open the output file and handle the error correctly anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Prepare a test script to transition of the default branch name to
'main'.
* js/default-branch-name-adjust-t5411:
t5411: finish preparing for `main` being the default branch name
t5411: adjust the remaining support files for init.defaultBranch=main
t5411: start adjusting the support files for init.defaultBranch=main
t5411: start using the default branch name "main"
The code to detect premature EOF in the sideband demultiplexer has
been cleaned up.
* jk/sideband-more-error-checking:
sideband: diagnose more sideband anomalies
Exit codes from "git remote add" etc. were not usable by scripted
callers.
* ab/git-remote-exit-code:
remote: add meaningful exit code on missing/existing
A commit and tag object may have CR at the end of each and
every line (you can create such an object with hash-object or
using --cleanup=verbatim to decline the default clean-up
action), but it would make it impossible to have a blank line
to separate the title from the body of the message. Be lenient
and accept a line with lone CR on it as a blank line, too.
* pb/ref-filter-with-crlf:
log, show: add tests for messages containing CRLF
ref-filter: handle CRLF at end-of-line more gracefully
"git checkout-index" did not consistently signal an error with its
exit status.
* jk/checkout-index-errors:
checkout-index: propagate errors to exit code
checkout-index: drop error message from empty --stage=all
"git diff" and other commands that share the same machinery to
compare with working tree files have been taught to take advantage
of the fsmonitor data when available.
* nk/diff-files-vs-fsmonitor:
p7519-fsmonitor: add a git add benchmark
p7519-fsmonitor: refactor to avoid code duplication
perf lint: add make test-lint to perf tests
t/perf: add fsmonitor perf test for git diff
t/perf/p7519-fsmonitor.sh: warm cache on first git status
t/perf/README: elaborate on output format
fsmonitor: use fsmonitor data in `git diff`
More preliminary tests have been added to document desired outcome
of various "directory rename" situations.
* en/dir-rename-tests:
t6423: more involved rules for renaming directories into each other
t6423: update directory rename detection tests with new rule
t6423: more involved directory rename test
directory-rename-detection.txt: update references to regression tests
This patch will let the new `check-whitespace` GitHub workflow be happy
with the upcoming patch series that wants to search-and-replace `master`
with `main` in t9603 and some other test scripts.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two blocks in t5570 want to align the closing double quotes, padding
with spaces if needed. Since the maximum length of those lines is
defined by the branch name `master`, the upcoming rename to `main` would
unalign the quotes.
But then, it is unclear how those aligned closing quotes should help
readability anyway, so let's just remove that padding altogether.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch actually prepares for the upcoming patches to replace
`master` with `main` in these tests: we do not want those changes to be
flagged by the new `check-whitespace` GitHub workflow (even if those
changes do not introduce the whitespace issues, they touch lines
affected by those issues without fixing them).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In b6211b89eb (tests: avoid variations of the `master` branch name,
2020-09-26), the `master[123]` branch names were renamed to
`topic_[123]`. A non-literal mention of the corresponding files was
missed in that commit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The message in question reads awkward with the name "master", but will
be even more confusing once that is renamed to "main". Let's adjust it
in advance of said rename.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 8de7eeb54b (compression: unify pack.compression configuration
parsing, 2016-11-15), we introduced identical copies of the `file_size`
helper into three test scripts, with the plan to eventually consolidate
them into a single copy.
Let's do that, and adjust the function name to adhere to the `test_*`
naming convention.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 3aef54e8b8 ("diff: munmap() file contents before running external
diff") introduced calls to diff_free_filespec_data in
run_external_diff, which may pass NULL pointers.
Fix this and prevent any such bugs in the future by making
`diff_free_filespec_data(NULL)` a no-op.
Fixes: 3aef54e8b8 ("diff: munmap() file contents before running external diff")
Signed-off-by: Jinoh Kang <luke1337@theori.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After rebasing, ORIG_HEAD is supposed to point to the old HEAD of the
rebased branch. The code used find_unique_abbrev() to obtain the
object name of the old HEAD and wrote to both
.git/rebase-merge/orig-head (used by `rebase --abort` to go back to
the previous state) and to ORIG_HEAD. The buffer find_unique_abbrev()
gives back is volatile, unfortunately, and was overwritten after the
former file is written but before ORIG_FILE is written, leaving an
incorrect object name in it.
Avoid relying on the volatile buffer of find_unique_abbrev(), and
instead supply our own buffer to keep the object name.
I think that all of the users of head_hash should actually be using
opts->orig_head instead as passing a string rather than a struct
object_id around is a hang over from the scripted implementation. This
patch just fixes the immediate bug and adds a regression test based on
Caspar's reproduction example[1]. The users will be converted to use
struct object_id and head_hash removed in the next few commits.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAFzd1+7PDg2PZgKw7U0kdepdYuoML9wSN4kofmB_-8NHrbbrHg@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Caspar Duregger <herr.kaste@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
