There are two callers of this function, which ensures that a dispatched
call to refspec_item_init() does not fail.
In the following commit, we're going to add fetch/push-specific variants
of refspec_item_init(), which will turn one function into two. To avoid
introducing yet another pair of new functions (such as
refspec_item_init_push_or_die() and refspec_item_init_fetch_or_die()),
let's remove the thin wrapper entirely.
This duplicates a single line of code among two callers, but thins the
refspec.h API by one function, and prevents introducing two more in the
following commit.
Note that we still have a trailing Boolean argument in the function
`refspec_item_init()`. The following commit will address this.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To avoid having a Boolean argument in the refspec_init() function,
replace it with two variants:
- `refspec_init_fetch()`
- `refspec_init_push()`
to codify the meaning of that Boolean into the function's name itself.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 6d4c057859 (refspec: introduce struct refspec, 2018-05-16), we
have macros called REFSPEC_FETCH and REFSPEC_PUSH. This confusingly
suggests that we might introduce other modes in the future, which, while
possible, is highly unlikely.
But these values are treated as a Boolean, and stored in a struct field
called 'fetch'. So the following:
if (refspec->fetch == REFSPEC_FETCH) { ... }
, and
if (refspec->fetch) { ... }
are equivalent. Let's avoid renaming the Boolean values "true" and
"false" here and remove the two REFSPEC_ macros mentioned above.
Since this value is truly a Boolean and will only ever take on a value
of 0 or 1, we can declare it as a single bit unsigned field. In
practice this won't shrink the size of 'struct refspec', but it more
clearly indicates the intent.
Note that this introduces some awkwardness like:
refspec_item_init_or_die(&spec, refspec, 1);
, where it's unclear what the final "1" does. This will be addressed in
the following commits.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/fetch-ref-prefix-cleanup:
fetch: use ref prefix list to skip ls-refs
fetch: avoid ls-refs only to ask for HEAD symref update
fetch: stop protecting additions to ref-prefix list
fetch: ask server to advertise HEAD for config-less fetch
refspec_ref_prefixes(): clean up refspec_item logic
t5516: beef up exact-oid ref prefixes test
t5516: drop NEEDSWORK about v2 reachability behavior
t5516: prefer "oid" to "sha1" in some test titles
t5702: fix typo in test name
"git version --build-options" stopped showing zlib version by
mistake due to recent refactoring, which has been corrected.
* tc/zlib-ng-fix:
help: print zlib-ng version number
help: include git-zlib.h to print zlib version
In git-fetch we have an optimization to avoid issuing an ls-refs command
to the server if we don't care about the value of any refs (e.g.,
because we are fetching exact object ids), saving a round-trip to the
server. This comes from e70a3030e7 (fetch: do not list refs if fetching
only hashes, 2018-09-27).
It uses an explicit flag "must_list_refs" to decide when we need to do
so. That was needed back then, because the list of ref-prefixes was not
always complete. If it was empty, it did not necessarily mean that we
were not interested in any refs). But that is no longer the case; an
empty list of prefixes means that we truly do not care about any refs.
And so rather than an explicit flag, we can just check whether we are
interested in any ref prefixes. This simplifies the code slightly, as
there is now a single source of truth for the decision.
It also fixes a bug in / optimizes a very unlikely case, which is:
git fetch $remote ^foo $oid
I.e., a negative refspec combined with an exact oid fetch. This is
somewhat nonsense, in that there are no positive refspecs mentioning
refs to countermand with the negative one. But we should be able to do
this without issuing an ls-refs command (excluding "foo" from the empty
set will obviously still be the empty set).
However, the current code does not do so. The negative refspec is not
counted as a noop in un-setting the must_list_refs flag (hardly the
fault of e70a3030e7, as negative refspecs did not appear until much
later). But by using the prefix list as a source of truth, this
naturally just works; the negative refspec does not add a prefix to ask
about, and hence does not trigger the ls-refs call.
This is esoteric enough that I didn't bother adding a test. The real
value here is in the code simplification.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we fetch from a configured remote, we may try to update the local
refs/remotes/<origin>/HEAD, and so we ask the server to advertise its
HEAD to us.
But if we aren't otherwise asking about any refs at all, then we know
this HEAD update can never happen! To consider a new value for HEAD,
the set_head() function uses guess_remote_head(). And even if it sees an
explicit symref value for HEAD, it will only report that as a match if
we also saw that remote ref advertised, and it mapped to a local
tracking ref via get_fetch_map().
In other words, a fetch like this:
git fetch origin $exact_oid:refs/heads/foo
can never update HEAD, because we will never have fetched (nor even see
the advertisement for) the ref that HEAD points to.
Currently the command above will still call ls-refs to ask about the
HEAD, even though it is pointless. This patch teaches it to skip the
ls-refs call entirely in this case, which avoids a round-trip to the
server.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using the ref-prefix feature of protocol v2, a client which sends
no prefixes at all will get the full advertisement. And so the code in
git-fetch was historically loose about setting up that list based on our
refspecs. There were cases where we needed to know about some refs, so
we just didn't add anything to the ref-prefix list.
And hence further code, like that for tag-following and updating
origin/HEAD, had to be careful about adding to an empty list. E.g., see
the bug fixed by bd52d9a058 (fetch: fix following tags when fetching
specific OID, 2025-03-07).
But the previous commit removed the last such case, and now we know an
empty ref-prefix list (at least inside git-fetch's do_fetch() function)
means that we really don't need to see any refs. So we can drop those
extra conditionals.
This simplifies the code a little. But it also means that some cases can
now use ref prefixes when they would not otherwise. As the test shows,
fetching an exact oid into a local ref can now avoid enumerating all of
the refs. The refspec itself doesn't need to know about any remote refs,
and the tag auto-following can just ask about refs/tags/.
The same is true for asking about HEAD to update the local origin/HEAD.
I didn't add a test for that yet, though, as we can optimize it even
further.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we're not given any refspecs (either on the command line or via
config) and we have no branch merge config, then we fetch the remote
HEAD into our local FETCH_HEAD. In that case we do not send any
ref-prefix option to the server at all, and we see the full
advertisement.
But this is sub-optimal. We only care about HEAD, so we can just ask
for that, and ignore all of the other refs.
The new test demonstrates a case where we see fewer refs (in this case
only one less, but in theory we could be ignoring millions of them).
This also removes the only case where we care about seeing some refs
from the other side, but don't add anything to the ref_prefixes list.
Cleaning this up means one less maintenance burden. Before this patch,
any code which wanted to add to the list had to make sure the list was
not empty, since an empty list meant "ask for everything". Now it really
means "we are not interested in any refs".
This should let us optimize a few more cases in subsequent patches.
Note that we'll add "HEAD" to the list of prefixes, and later code for
updating "refs/remotes/<remote>/HEAD" may likewise do so. In theory this
could cause duplicates in the list, but in practice these can't both
trigger. We hit our new case only if there are no refspecs, and the
"<remote>/HEAD" feature is enabled only when we are fetching from a
remote with configured refspecs. We could be defensive with a flag, but
it didn't seem worth it to me (the absolute worse case is a useless
redundant ref-prefix line sent to the server).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The point of refspec_ref_prefixes() is to look over the set of refspecs
and set up an appropriate list of "ref-prefix" strings to send to the
server.
The logic for handling individual refspec_items has some confusing bits.
The final part of our if/else cascade checks this:
else if (item->src && !item->exact_sha1)
prefix = item->src;
But we know that "item->exact_sha1" can never be true, because earlier
we did:
if (item->exact_sha1 || item->negative)
continue;
This is due to 6c301adb0a (fetch: do not pass ref-prefixes for fetch by
exact SHA1, 2018-05-31), which added the continue. So it is tempting to
remove the extra exact_sha1 at the end of the cascade, leaving the one
at the top of the loop.
But I don't think that's quite right. The full cascade is:
if (rs->fetch == REFSPEC_FETCH)
prefix = item->src;
else if (item->dst)
prefix = item->dst;
else if (item->src && !item->exact_sha1)
prefix = item->src;
which all comes from 6373cb598e (refspec: consolidate ref-prefix
generation logic, 2018-05-16). That first "if" is supposed to handle
fetches, where we care about the source name, since that is coming from
the server. And the rest should be for pushes, where we care about the
destination, since that's the name the server will use. And we get that
either explicitly from "dst" (for something like "foo:bar") or
implicitly from the source (a refspec like "foo" is treated as
"foo:foo").
But how should exact_sha1 interact with those? For a fetch, exact_sha1
always means we do not care about sending a name to the server (there is
no server refname at all). But pushing an exact sha1 should still care
about the destination on the server! It is only if we have to fall back
to the implicit source that we need to care if it is a real ref (though
arguably such a push does not even make sense; where would the server
store it?).
So I think that 6c301adb0a "broke" the push case by always skipping
exact_sha1 items, even though a push should only care about the
destination.
Of course this is all completely academic. We have still not implemented
a v2 push protocol, so even though we do call this function for pushes,
we'd never actually send these ref-prefix lines.
However, given the effort I spent to figure out what was going on here,
and the overlapping exact_sha1 checks, I'd like to rewrite this to
preemptively fix the bug, and hopefully make it less confusing.
This splits the "if" at the top-level into fetch vs push, and then each
handles exact_sha1 appropriately itself. The check for negative refspecs
remains outside of either (there is no protocol support for them, so we
never send them to the server, but rather use them only to reduce the
advertisement we receive).
The resulting behavior should be identical for fetches, but hopefully
sets us up better for a potential future v2 push.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 6c301adb0a (fetch: do not pass ref-prefixes for fetch by exact
SHA1, 2018-05-31) added a test that fetching an exact oid with the v2
protocol works. Originally it failed without the code change from that
commit, because fetch failed with "no matching remote head".
That changed in 0177565148 (transport: do not list refs if possible,
2018-09-27), which made fetch more forgiving of this case.
But that now meant the test passes even without its fix! So let's also
have it check the packet listing to make sure we did not ask for the
bogus prefix (ultimately this is less important than whether the command
fails, since it's just an optimization, but we should make sure not to
regress it).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When this test was added in 6c301adb0a (fetch: do not pass ref-prefixes
for fetch by exact SHA1, 2018-05-31), there was still some uncertainty
about the v2 protocol's looser behavior with serving objects that are
not directly pointed at by a ref.
At this point that behavior is well established, and I do not think we
would ever change v2 to match the v0 behavior (and if we did,
remembering to update this test is the least of our concerns).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These old tests refer to object ids as "sha1". These days we prefer
the more algorithm-agnostic "oid".
There are a few more tests that mention sha1 in the title and also use
it in variables throughout the test. I've left them for now, as changing
them is more involved (and they're linked to the allowTipSHA1InWant
config, which as a v0-only thing actually is always sha1).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit bc26f7690a (clone: make it possible to specify --tags,
2025-02-06) added a new paragraph in the middle of this list item. By
adding an empty line rather than using a list continuation, we broke the
list continuation, with the new paragraph ending up funnily indented.
Restore the chain of list continuations.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Update for 2.49.0.
- Fix numerous typos found by spelling checker.
- Fix more straight quotes.
- Harmonize translation of "blob" (to "blob", not "blobb").
- Harmonize translation of "reflog" (to "referenslogg").
Signed-off-by: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
In 3f763ddf28 (fetch: set remote/HEAD if it does not exist, 2024-11-22),
unconditionally adds "HEAD" to the list of ref prefixes we send to the
server.
This breaks a core assumption that the list of prefixes we send to the
server is complete. We must either send all prefixes we care about, or
none at all (in the latter case the server then advertises everything).
The tag following code is careful to only add "refs/tags/" to the list
of prefixes if there are already entries in the prefix list. But because
the new code from 3f763ddf28 runs after the tag code, and because it
unconditionally adds to the prefix list, we may end up with a prefix
list that _should_ have "refs/tags/" in it, but doesn't.
When that is the case, the server does not advertise any tags, and our
auto-following breaks because we never learned about any tags in the
first place.
Fix this by only adding "HEAD" to the ref prefixes when we know that we
are already limiting the advertisement. In either case we'll learn about
HEAD (either through the limited advertisement, or implicitly through a
full advertisement).
Reported-by: Igor Todorovski <itodorov@ca.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When building against zlib-ng, the header file `zlib.h` is not included,
but `zlib-ng.h` is included instead. It's `zlib.h` that defines
`ZLIB_VERSION` and that macro is used to print out zlib version in
`git-version(1)` with `--build-options`. But when it's not defined, no
version is printed.
`zlib-ng.h` defines another macro: `ZLIBNG_VERSION`. Use that macro to
print the zlib-ng version in `git version --build-options` when it's
set. Otherwise fallback to `ZLIB_VERSION`.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 41f1a8435a (git-compat-util: move include of "compat/zlib.h" into
"git-zlib.h", 2025-01-28) some code was refactored to enable easier
linking against zlib-ng.
This removed `zlib.h` being indirectly included in `help.c`. As this
file uses `ZLIB_VERSION` to print the version number of zlib when
running git-version(1) with `--build-options`, this resulted in a
regression.
Include `git-zlib.h` directly into `help.c` to print zlib version
information. This brings back the zlib version in the output of
`git version --build-options`.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hotfix to help building Git-for-Windows.
* js/win-2.49-build-fixes:
cmake: generalize the handling of the `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` list
meson: fix sorting
ident: stop assuming that `gw_gecos` is writable
Some future breaking changes would remove certain parts of the
default repository, which were still described even when the
documents were built for the future with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES.
* pw/repo-layout-doc-update:
docs: fix repository-layout when building with breaking changes
A late-comer to the v2.49.0 party, `sk/unit-test-oid`, added yet another
array item to `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`, causing the `win+VS build` job to fail
with symptoms like this one:
unit-tests-lib.lib(u-oid-array.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved
external symbol cl_parse_any_oid referenced in function fill_array
This is a similar scenario to the one that forced me to write
8afda42fce (cmake: generalize the handling of the `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`
list, 2024-09-18): The hard-coded echo of `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` in
`CMakeLists.txt` that recapitulates faithfully what was already
hard-coded in `Makefile` would either have to be updated whack-a-mole
style, or generalized.
Just like I chose the latter option for `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`, I now do the
same for `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 904339edbd (Introduce support for the Meson build system,
2024-12-06) the `meson.build` file was introduced, adding also a
Windows-specific list of source files. This list was obviously meant to
be sorted alphabetically, but there is one mistake. Let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 590e081dea (ident: add NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT for systems without
pw_gecos in struct passwd, 2011-05-19), code was introduced to iterate
over the `gw_gecos` field; The loop variable is of type `char *`, which
assumes that `gw_gecos` is writable.
However, it is not necessarily writable (and it is a bad idea to have it
writable in the first place), so let's switch the loop variable type to
`const char *`.
This is not a new problem, but what is new is the Meson build. While it
does not trigger in CI builds, imitating the commands of
`ci/run-build-and-tests.sh` in a regular Git for Windows SDK (`meson
setup build . --fatal-meson-warnings --warnlevel 2 --werror --wrap-mode
nofallback -Dfuzzers=true` followed by `meson compile -C build --`
results in this beautiful error:
"cc" [...] -o libgit.a.p/ident.c.obj "-c" ../ident.c
../ident.c: In function 'copy_gecos':
../ident.c:68:18: error: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
68 | for (src = get_gecos(w); *src && *src != ','; src++) {
| ^
cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors
Now, why does this not trigger in CI? The answer is as simple as it is
puzzling: The `win+Meson` job completely side-steps Git for Windows'
development environment, opting instead to use the GCC that is on the
`PATH` in GitHub-hosted `windows-latest` runners. That GCC is pinned to
v12.2.0 and targets the UCRT (unlikely to change any time soon, see
https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/win25/20250303.1/images/windows/toolsets/toolset-2022.json#L132-L141).
That is in stark contrast to Git for Windows, which uses GCC v14.2.0 and
targets MSVCRT. Git for Windows' `Makefile`-based build also obviously
uses different compiler flags, otherwise this compile error would have
had plenty of opportunity in almost 14 years to surface.
In other words, contrary to my expectations, the `win+Meson` job is
ill-equipped to replace the `win build` job because it exercises a
completely different tool version/compiler flags vector than what Git
for Windows needs.
Nevertheless, there is currently this huge push, including breaking
changes after -rc1 and all, for switching to Meson. Therefore, we need
to make it work, somehow, even in Git for Windows' SDK, hence this
patch, at this point in time.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
