Jeff King 8dccb2244c refs: add DO_FOR_EACH_OMIT_DANGLING_SYMREFS flag
When the DO_FOR_EACH_INCLUDE_BROKEN flag is used, we include both actual
corrupt refs (illegal names, missing objects), but also symrefs that
point to nothing. This latter is not really a corruption, but just
something that may happen normally. For example, the symref at
refs/remotes/origin/HEAD may point to a tracking branch which is later
deleted. (The local HEAD may also be unborn, of course, but we do not
access it through ref iteration).

Most callers of for_each_ref() etc, do not care. They don't pass
INCLUDE_BROKEN, so don't see it at all. But for those which do pass it,
this somewhat-normal state causes extra warnings (e.g., from
for-each-ref) or even aborts operations (destructive repacks with
GIT_REF_PARANOIA set).

This patch just introduces the flag and the mechanism; there are no
callers yet (and hence no tests). Two things to note on the
implementation:

  - we actually skip any symref that does not resolve to a ref. This
    includes ones which point to an invalidly-named ref. You could argue
    this is a more serious breakage than simple dangling. But the
    overall effect is the same (we could not follow the symref), as well
    as the impact on things like REF_PARANOIA (either way, a symref we
    can't follow won't impact reachability, because we'll see the ref
    itself during iteration). The underlying resolution function doesn't
    distinguish these two cases (they both get REF_ISBROKEN).

  - we change the iterator in refs/files-backend.c where we check
    INCLUDE_BROKEN. There's a matching spot in refs/packed-backend.c,
    but we don't know need to do anything there. The packed backend does
    not support symrefs at all.

The resulting set of flags might be a bit easier to follow if we broke
this down into "INCLUDE_CORRUPT_REFS" and "INCLUDE_DANGLING_SYMREFS".
But there are a few reasons not do so:

  - adding a new OMIT_DANGLING_SYMREFS flag lets us leave existing
    callers intact, without changing their behavior (and some of them
    really do want to see the dangling symrefs; e.g., t5505 has a test
    which expects us to report when a symref becomes dangling)

  - they're not actually independent. You cannot say "include dangling
    symrefs" without also including refs whose objects are not
    reachable, because dangling symrefs by definition do not have an
    object. We could tweak the implementation to distinguish this, but
    in practice nobody wants to ask for that. Adding the OMIT flag keeps
    the implementation simple and makes sure we don't regress the
    current behavior.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-27 12:36:45 -07:00
2021-09-20 15:20:39 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:45:03 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-07-22 13:05:54 -07:00
2021-07-13 16:52:50 -07:00
2021-08-12 14:00:52 -07:00
2021-05-10 16:59:47 +09:00
2021-03-08 09:56:34 -08:00
2021-01-21 15:50:00 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-04-27 16:31:39 +09:00
2021-05-07 12:47:41 +09:00
2021-01-23 17:14:07 -08:00
2021-07-13 16:52:50 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-09-20 15:20:39 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-09-09 15:49:04 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:44:48 -07:00
2021-08-24 15:33:23 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-09-20 15:20:43 -07:00
2021-09-10 11:46:28 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-04-27 16:31:39 +09:00
2021-07-28 13:17:58 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-04-08 13:23:25 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-09-20 15:20:40 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-08-24 15:32:37 -07:00
2021-07-26 12:01:26 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-05 16:40:45 -08:00
2020-12-14 10:21:36 -08:00
2021-08-24 15:33:23 -07:00
2021-09-10 11:46:30 -07:00
2021-02-17 17:21:40 -08:00
2021-09-23 13:44:48 -07:00
2021-09-23 13:44:48 -07:00
2021-07-28 13:17:59 -07:00
2021-07-22 13:35:20 -07:00
2021-07-22 13:35:20 -07:00
2021-05-04 12:09:43 +09:00
2021-09-20 15:20:43 -07:00
2021-09-20 15:20:43 -07:00
2021-09-10 11:46:27 -07:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 559 MiB
Languages
C 50.4%
Shell 38.7%
Perl 4.4%
Tcl 3.1%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.4%