Jeff King 8e118e8490 pack-objects: update "nr_seen" progress based on pack-reused count
When serving a clone or fetch with bitmaps, after deciding which objects
need to be sent our "pack reuse" mechanism kicks in: we try to send
more-or-less verbatim a bunch of objects from the beginning of the
bitmapped packfile without even adding them to the to_pack.objects
array.

After deciding which objects will be in the "reused" portion, we update
nr_result to account for those, and then trigger display_progress() to
show the user (who is undoubtedly dazzled that we managed to enumerate
so many objects so quickly).

But then something confusing happens: the "Enumerating objects" progress
meter jumps _backwards_, counting up from zero the number of objects we
actually add into to_pack.objects.

This worked correctly once upon a time, but was broken in 5af050437a
(pack-objects: show some progress when counting kept objects,
2018-04-15), when the latter half of that progress meter switched to
using a separate nr_seen counter, rather than nr_result. Nobody noticed
for two reasons:

  - prior to the pack-reuse fixes from a14aebeac3 (Merge branch
    'jk/packfile-reuse-cleanup', 2020-02-14), the reuse code almost
    never kicked in anyway

  - the output looks _kind of_ correct. The "backwards" moment is hard
    to catch, because we overwrite the old progress number with the new
    one, and the larger number is displayed only for a second. So unless
    you look at that exact second, you just see the much smaller value,
    counting up to the number of non-reused objects (though of course if
    you catch it in stderr, or look at GIT_TRACE_PACKET from a server
    with bitmaps, you can see both values).

This smaller output isn't wrong per se, but isn't counting what we ever
intended to. We should give the user the whole number of objects we
considered (which, as per 5af050437a's original purpose, is already
_not_ a count of what goes into to_pack.objects). The follow-on
"Counting objects" meter shows the actual number of objects we feed into
that array.

We can easily fix this by bumping (and showing) nr_seen for the
pack-reused objects. When the included test is run without this patch,
the second pack-objects invocation produces "Enumerating objects: 1" to
show the one loose object, even though the resulting pack has hundreds
of objects in it. With it, we jump to "Enumerating objects: 674" after
deciding on reuse, and then "675" when we add in the loose object.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-12 11:31:30 -07:00
2021-03-26 14:49:41 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2020-12-08 15:11:21 -08:00
2021-01-21 15:50:00 -08:00
2020-12-08 15:11:17 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-01-23 17:14:07 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-01-25 14:19:19 -08:00
2021-02-17 17:21:40 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-25 16:43:30 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-16 09:30:42 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-26 14:49:41 -07:00
2021-02-12 14:21:04 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-22 12:07:40 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2020-12-14 15:01:03 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-17 17:21:40 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-19 15:25:38 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-05 16:40:45 -08:00
2020-12-14 10:21:36 -08:00
2021-03-26 14:49:41 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-17 17:21:40 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-05 16:40:44 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-12 15:49:35 +01:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-05 13:49:55 -08:00
2021-01-04 15:23:08 -08:00
2021-02-09 14:14:34 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 678 MiB
Languages
C 50.5%
Shell 38.7%
Perl 4.5%
Tcl 3.2%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.1%