mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2026-03-26 08:30:10 +01:00
94d75d1ed5
One test in t1512 that expects a failure incorrectly passed. The
test prepares a commit whose object name begins with ten "0"s, and
also prepares a tag that points at the commit. The object name of
the tag also begins with ten "0"s. There is no other commit-ish
object in the repository whose name begins with such a prefix.
Ideally, in such a repository:
$ git rev-parse --verify 0000000000^{commit}
should yield that commit. If 0000000000 is taken as the commit
0000000000e4f, peeling it to a commmit yields that commit itself,
and if 0000000000 is taken as the tag 0000000000f8f, peeling it to a
commit also yields the same commit, so in that twisted sense, the
extended SHA-1 expression 0000000000^{commit} is unambigous. The
test that expects a failure is to check the above command.
The reason the test expects a failure is that we did not implement
such a "unification" of two candidate objects. What we did (or at
least, meant to) implement was to recognise that a commit-ish is
required to expand 0000000000, and notice that there are two succh
commit-ish, and diagnose the request as ambiguous.
However, there was a bug in the logic to check the candidate
objects. When the code saw 0000000000f8f (a tag) that shared the
shortened prefix (ten "0"s), it tried to make sure that the tag is a
commit-ish by looking at the tag object. Because it incorrectly
used lookup_object() when the tag has not been parsed, however, we
incorrectly declared that the tag is _not_ a commit-ish, leaving the
sole commit in the repository, 0000000000e4f, that has the required
prefix as "unique match", causing the test to pass when it shouldn't.
This fixes the logic to inspect the type of the object a tag refers
to, to make the test that is expected to fail correctly fail.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
GIT - the stupid content tracker
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"git" can mean anything, depending on your mood.
- random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not
actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a
mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
- stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the
dictionary of slang.
- "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually
works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
- "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an
unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations
and full access to internals.
Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License.
It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of
hackers around the net. It is currently maintained by Junio C Hamano.
Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.
See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/everyday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-commandname.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with "man gittutorial" or "git help tutorial", and the
documentation of each command with "man git-commandname" or "git help
commandname".
CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
("man gitcvs-migration" or "git help cvs-migration" if git is
installed).
Many Git online resources are accessible from http://git-scm.com/
including full documentation and Git related tools.
The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git
mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature
requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org. To subscribe
to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git and other archival sites.
The messages titled "A note from the maintainer", "What's in
git.git (stable)" and "What's cooking in git.git (topics)" and
the discussion following them on the mailing list give a good
reference for project status, development direction and
remaining tasks.