Jeff King e4c9538a9c send-pack: complain about "expecting report" with --helper-status
When pushing to a server which erroneously omits the final ref-status
report, the client side should complain about the refs for which we
didn't receive the status (because we can't just assume they were
updated). This works over most transports like ssh, but for http we'll
print a very misleading "Everything up-to-date".

It works for ssh because send-pack internally sets the status of each
ref to REF_STATUS_EXPECTING_REPORT, and then if the server doesn't tell
us about a particular ref, it will stay at that value. When we print the
final status table, we'll see that we're still on EXPECTING_REPORT and
complain then.

But for http, we go through remote-curl, which invokes send-pack with
"--stateless-rpc --helper-status". The latter option causes send-pack to
return a machine-readable list of ref statuses to the remote helper. But
ever since its inception in de1a2fdd38 (Smart push over HTTP: client
side, 2009-10-30), the send-pack code has simply omitted mention of any
ref which ended up in EXPECTING_REPORT.

In the remote helper, we then take the absence of any status report
from send-pack to mean that the ref was not even something we tried to
send, and thus it prints "Everything up-to-date". Fortunately it does
detect the eventual non-zero exit from send-pack, and propagates that in
its own non-zero exit code. So at least a careful script invoking "git
push" would notice the failure.  But sending the misleading message on
stderr is certainly confusing for humans (not to mention the
machine-readable "push --porcelain" output, though again, any careful
script should be checking the exit code from push, too).

Nobody seems to have noticed because the server in this instance has to
be misbehaving: it has promised to support the ref-status capability
(otherwise the client will not set EXPECTING_REPORT at all), but didn't
send us any. If the connection were simply cut, then send-pack would
complain about getting EOF while trying to read the status. But if the
server actually sends a flush packet (i.e., saying "now you have all of
the ref statuses" without actually sending any), then the client ends up
in this confused situation.

The fix is simple: we should return an error message from "send-pack
--helper-status", just like we would for any other error per-ref error
condition (in the test I included, the server simply omits all ref
status responses, but a more insidious version of this would skip only
some of them).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-10-18 13:26:52 -07:00
2021-10-12 13:51:59 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-07-22 13:05:54 -07:00
2021-07-13 16:52:50 -07:00
2021-08-12 14:00:52 -07:00
2021-05-10 16:59:47 +09:00
2021-03-08 09:56:34 -08:00
2021-01-21 15:50:00 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-06-14 10:16:06 +09:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-04-27 16:31:39 +09:00
2021-05-07 12:47:41 +09:00
2021-01-23 17:14:07 -08:00
2021-07-13 16:52:50 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-07-16 17:42:53 -07:00
2021-07-16 17:42:53 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-08-06 12:52:15 -07:00
2021-08-04 13:28:52 -07:00
2021-06-14 13:33:27 +09:00
2021-07-30 12:14:27 -07:00
2021-07-28 13:17:57 -07:00
2021-08-16 12:15:44 -07:00
2021-07-13 16:52:53 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-22 12:07:40 -08:00
2021-07-28 13:17:59 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-17 17:21:40 -08:00
2021-07-30 12:14:27 -07:00
2021-07-28 13:17:59 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-04-27 16:31:39 +09:00
2021-07-28 13:17:58 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-04-08 13:23:25 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-08-04 13:28:52 -07:00
2021-08-04 13:28:52 -07:00
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
2021-02-05 16:40:45 -08:00
2020-12-14 10:21:36 -08:00
2021-10-12 13:51:59 -07:00
2021-02-17 17:21:40 -08:00
2021-04-14 13:47:54 -07:00
2021-07-28 13:17:59 -07:00
2021-09-20 11:25:01 -07:00
2021-05-04 12:09:43 +09:00
2021-07-16 17:42:53 -07:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00
2021-05-04 11:52:02 +09:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission). To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 625 MiB
Languages
C 50.4%
Shell 38.8%
Perl 4.4%
Tcl 3.1%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.3%